• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

建立爱尔兰肺减容术的专家意见框架:德尔菲共识技术。

Establishing an expert opinion framework for lung volume reduction in Ireland: a Delphi consensus technique.

机构信息

Professor Eoin O'Malley National Thoracic and Transplant Centre, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Eccles St., Dublin, D07R2WY, Ireland.

Beacon Court, Beacon Hospital, Bracken Rd, Sandyford Business Park, Dublin, Sandyford, Ireland.

出版信息

Ir J Med Sci. 2024 Apr;193(2):843-849. doi: 10.1007/s11845-023-03467-7. Epub 2023 Aug 8.

DOI:10.1007/s11845-023-03467-7
PMID:37550599
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10961259/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lung volume reduction (LVR) is an effective treatment option offered to patients with emphysema. There is no formalised LVR referral network in Ireland. A rigorous approach to agreeing and implementing a LVR referral framework in an Irish context is required. A Delphi process was used to provide a basis for a framework of multi-disciplinary teams (MDTs) which can provide LVR as a management option. A Delphi process offers a framework for understanding variations and developing a consensus from expert opinion.

AIM

The aim of this study was to develop consensus on recommendations for LVR referral guidelines in an Irish context and provide a national scope based on current practice and evidence.

DESIGN

In accordance with Guidance on Conducting and Reporting Delphi Studies, a consensus-building Delphi study was performed. Thirty-three statements informed from review of research literature were identified and presented to participants. Evaluation of the statements was performed by an expert panel using a 5-point Likert scale. ≥ 70% agreement was defined as consensus and items with a consensus rating of < 70% were revised during the process. In total, Delphi questionnaires were distributed to 18 experts with a response rate of 78% (n = 14) and a follow-up response-rate of 50% (n = 7).

SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: The expert panel in Ireland consisted of representatives from respiratory medicine, cardiothoracic surgery and allied-health professionals with expertise in COPD care.

RESULTS

Of the initial 33 statements in five dimensions, there were consensus regarding 31 statements.

CONCLUSIONS

The 31 statements agreed through this Delphi study clarify a coherent direction for development of a LVR framework in Ireland. The Delphi study methodology described is a useful process to reach consensus among multi-disciplinary experts.

摘要

背景

肺减容术(LVR)是治疗肺气肿患者的有效治疗选择。爱尔兰没有规范化的 LVR 转诊网络。需要采用严格的方法来达成并实施爱尔兰语境下的 LVR 转诊框架。德尔菲法(Delphi)用于为多学科团队(MDTs)的框架提供依据,从而将 LVR 作为一种管理选择。德尔菲法为理解差异和从专家意见中达成共识提供了框架。

目的

本研究旨在为爱尔兰语境下的 LVR 转诊指南制定共识,并根据当前实践和证据提供全国范围的建议。

设计

根据开展和报告德尔菲研究的指南,进行了一项共识建立的德尔菲研究。从文献回顾中确定并向参与者提出了 33 条陈述。专家小组使用 5 分李克特量表对陈述进行评估。≥70%的同意被定义为共识,共识评分<70%的项目在过程中进行修订。共向 18 名专家分发了德尔菲问卷,回复率为 78%(n=14),后续回复率为 50%(n=7)。

地点/参与者:爱尔兰的专家小组由呼吸内科、心胸外科和具有 COPD 护理专业知识的辅助医疗专业人员代表组成。

结果

在五个维度的最初 33 个陈述中,有 31 个陈述达成了共识。

结论

通过这项德尔菲研究达成一致的 31 个陈述阐明了在爱尔兰制定 LVR 框架的明确方向。所描述的德尔菲研究方法是在多学科专家中达成共识的有用过程。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7bf4/10961259/38c18be449fa/11845_2023_3467_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7bf4/10961259/1b6a2b0ac1c5/11845_2023_3467_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7bf4/10961259/38c18be449fa/11845_2023_3467_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7bf4/10961259/1b6a2b0ac1c5/11845_2023_3467_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7bf4/10961259/38c18be449fa/11845_2023_3467_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Establishing an expert opinion framework for lung volume reduction in Ireland: a Delphi consensus technique.建立爱尔兰肺减容术的专家意见框架:德尔菲共识技术。
Ir J Med Sci. 2024 Apr;193(2):843-849. doi: 10.1007/s11845-023-03467-7. Epub 2023 Aug 8.
2
Using the Delphi technique to achieve consensus on bereavement care in palliative care in Europe: An EAPC White Paper.运用德尔菲技术达成欧洲姑息治疗中哀伤护理的共识:一份欧洲姑息治疗协会白皮书。
Palliat Med. 2021 Dec;35(10):1908-1922. doi: 10.1177/02692163211043000. Epub 2021 Sep 6.
3
A modified Delphi process to form an expert consensus in Ireland on the essential information to be included in shared decision making for varicose vein surgery.采用改良 Delphi 法在爱尔兰形成专家共识,以确定静脉曲张手术中需要纳入共同决策的基本信息。
Phlebology. 2023 May;38(4):259-269. doi: 10.1177/02683555231158284. Epub 2023 Mar 4.
4
Framework and components for effective discharge planning system: a Delphi methodology.有效的出院计划系统的框架和组成部分:德尔菲法。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Nov 14;12:396. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-396.
5
International consensus recommendations for the optimal prioritisation and distribution of surgical services in low-income and middle-income countries: a modified Delphi process.国际共识建议:优化中低收入国家的手术服务优先级和分配:改良 Delphi 法。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jan 24;13(1):e062687. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062687.
6
Consensus recommendations for opioid agonist treatment following the introduction of emergency clinical guidelines in Ireland during the COVID-19 pandemic: A national Delphi study.在 COVID-19 大流行期间爱尔兰引入紧急临床指南后,阿片类激动剂治疗的共识建议:一项全国性 Delphi 研究。
Int J Drug Policy. 2022 Aug;106:103768. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2022.103768. Epub 2022 Jun 16.
7
Building consensus on inpatient discharge pathway components in the management of blunt thoracic injuries: An e-Delphi study amongst an international professional expert panel.建立共识:在管理钝性胸部损伤方面,住院患者出院路径组成部分:国际专业专家小组的电子德尔菲研究。
Injury. 2021 Sep;52(9):2551-2559. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.03.061. Epub 2021 Apr 5.
8
Criteria for Critical Care Infants and Children: PICU Admission, Discharge, and Triage Practice Statement and Levels of Care Guidance.危重症婴幼儿标准:PICU 收治、出院和分诊实施声明和分级护理指南。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2019 Sep;20(9):847-887. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001963.
9
Use of Bone Marrow Concentrate to Treat Pain and Musculoskeletal Disorders: An Academic Delphi Investigation.使用骨髓浓缩物治疗疼痛和肌肉骨骼疾病:一项学术德尔菲调查。
Pain Physician. 2021 May;24(3):263-273.
10
Definition and management of right ventricular injury in adult patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for respiratory support using the Delphi method: a PRORVnet study. Expert position statements.应用德尔菲法对接受体外膜肺氧合呼吸支持的成年患者右心损伤的定义和管理:PRORVnet 研究。专家立场声明。
Intensive Care Med. 2024 Sep;50(9):1411-1425. doi: 10.1007/s00134-024-07551-z. Epub 2024 Aug 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Delphi Technique in Health Sciences: A Map.健康科学中的德尔菲技术:一幅图谱。
Front Public Health. 2020 Sep 22;8:457. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00457. eCollection 2020.
2
The Impact of a Newly Established Multidisciplinary Team on the Interventional Treatment of Patients With Emphysema.一个新成立的多学科团队对肺气肿患者介入治疗的影响。
Clin Med Insights Circ Respir Pulm Med. 2019 Jun 19;13:1179548419852063. doi: 10.1177/1179548419852063. eCollection 2019.
3
The role of a multidisciplinary severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease hyperinflation service in patient selection for lung volume reduction.
多学科重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病肺过度充气服务在肺减容术患者选择中的作用
J Thorac Dis. 2018 Oct;10(Suppl 27):S3335-S3343. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.07.36.
4
A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial of Zephyr Endobronchial Valve Treatment in Heterogeneous Emphysema (LIBERATE).Zephyr 支气管内阀治疗异质性肺气肿的多中心随机对照试验(LIBERATE)。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018 Nov 1;198(9):1151-1164. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201803-0590OC.
5
Consensus minimum data set for lung cancer multidisciplinary teams: Results of a Delphi process.肺癌多学科团队的共识最小数据集:德尔菲法的结果。
Respirology. 2018 Oct;23(10):927-934. doi: 10.1111/resp.13307. Epub 2018 Apr 11.
6
Defining consensus: a systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of Delphi studies.定义共识:系统评价为 Delphi 研究报告推荐了方法学标准。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Apr;67(4):401-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.12.002.
7
A randomized trial comparing lung-volume-reduction surgery with medical therapy for severe emphysema.一项比较肺减容手术与药物治疗重度肺气肿的随机试验。
N Engl J Med. 2003 May 22;348(21):2059-73. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa030287. Epub 2003 May 20.