• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

原发性和切口腹疝在患者特征和术后并发症方面存在差异-一项前瞻性队列研究纳入了 4565 例患者。

Primary and incisional ventral hernias are different in terms of patient characteristics and postoperative complications - A prospective cohort study of 4,565 patients.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Unité de Chirurgie Viscérale et Digestive, Hôpital Privé d'Antony, Antony, France.

出版信息

Int J Surg. 2018 Mar;51:114-119. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.01.010. Epub 2018 Feb 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.01.010
PMID:29413874
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Primary and incisional hernias are often pooled in publications studying hernia symptoms, treatment, or surgical outcomes. The question rises whether this is justified or if primary and incisional hernia should be considered as two separate entities. The aim of this prospective cohort study is to compare primary and incisional ventral hernias regarding patient characteristics, hernia characteristics, surgical characteristics, and postoperative complications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A registry-based, prospective cohort study was performed. All patients undergoing primary or incisional hernia repair surgery between September 1st, 2011 and February 29th, 2016 were included. Patient baseline characteristics, hernia characteristics, surgical characteristics, and postoperative outcomes were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 4565 patients were included, of whom 2374 had a primary hernia and 2191 had an incisional hernia. All patient, hernia, and surgical characteristics were statistically significantly different between primary and incisional hernias except for corticosteroid use, history of inguinal hernia, incarceration, and emergency surgery. Overall complication rates (wound, surgical, and medical) were significantly different (105/2374 (4.4%) for primary hernia versus 323/2191 (15%) for incisional hernia, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Primary and incisional hernia are statistically significantly different for almost all patient, hernia, surgical, and postoperative characteristics analyzed. Given these differences, data on primary hernias and incisional hernias should not be pooled in studies reporting on hernia repair.

摘要

背景

在研究疝症状、治疗或手术结果的出版物中,通常将原发性疝和切口疝合并在一起。问题是这样做是否合理,或者原发性疝和切口疝是否应被视为两个独立的实体。本前瞻性队列研究的目的是比较原发性和切口性腹疝在患者特征、疝特征、手术特征和术后并发症方面的差异。

材料和方法

进行了一项基于登记的前瞻性队列研究。纳入 2011 年 9 月 1 日至 2016 年 2 月 29 日期间接受原发性或切口疝修复手术的所有患者。收集并分析患者基线特征、疝特征、手术特征和术后结果。

结果

共纳入 4565 例患者,其中 2374 例为原发性疝,2191 例为切口疝。原发性和切口疝在所有患者、疝和手术特征方面均存在统计学显著差异,除皮质激素使用、腹股沟疝病史、嵌顿和急诊手术外。总体并发症发生率(伤口、手术和内科)存在显著差异(原发性疝为 105/2374(4.4%),切口疝为 323/2191(15%),p<0.001)。

结论

原发性和切口疝在几乎所有分析的患者、疝、手术和术后特征方面均存在统计学显著差异。鉴于这些差异,在报告疝修复的研究中,不应将原发性疝和切口疝的数据合并在一起。

相似文献

1
Primary and incisional ventral hernias are different in terms of patient characteristics and postoperative complications - A prospective cohort study of 4,565 patients.原发性和切口腹疝在患者特征和术后并发症方面存在差异-一项前瞻性队列研究纳入了 4565 例患者。
Int J Surg. 2018 Mar;51:114-119. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.01.010. Epub 2018 Feb 20.
2
Interposition of the omentum and/or the peritoneum in the emergency repair of large ventral hernias with polypropylene mesh.网膜和/或腹膜在聚丙烯网片急诊修补大型腹壁疝中的应用。
Int J Surg. 2014;12(6):578-86. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.04.009. Epub 2014 Apr 30.
3
Comparison of biological and alloplastic meshes in ventral incisional hernia repair.生物补片与异体补片在腹直肌切口疝修补术中的比较。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2018 Mar;403(2):255-263. doi: 10.1007/s00423-017-1639-9. Epub 2017 Dec 6.
4
Hernia width explains differences in outcomes between primary and incisional hernias: a prospective cohort study of 9159 patients.疝宽度解释原发性疝和切口疝结果差异的原因:一项 9159 例患者的前瞻性队列研究。
Hernia. 2021 Apr;25(2):463-469. doi: 10.1007/s10029-020-02340-1. Epub 2020 Nov 23.
5
Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: Results of a two thousand patients prospective multicentric database.腹腔镜下腹壁疝修补术:两千例患者前瞻性多中心数据库结果。
Int J Surg. 2018 Mar;51:31-38. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.01.022. Epub 2018 Feb 3.
6
Outcomes of abdominal wall reconstruction in patients with the combination of complex midline and lateral incisional hernias.复杂性中线和侧切口疝患者腹壁重建的结果。
Surgery. 2020 Sep;168(3):532-542. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2020.04.045. Epub 2020 May 12.
7
External Validation of the European Hernia Society Classification for Postoperative Complications after Incisional Hernia Repair: A Cohort Study of 2,191 Patients.欧洲疝学会切口疝修补术后并发症分类的外部验证:2191 例患者的队列研究。
J Am Coll Surg. 2018 Mar;226(3):223-229.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.11.018. Epub 2017 Dec 7.
8
Continuous local analgesia is effective in postoperative pain treatment after medium and large incisional hernia repair.持续局部镇痛在中大型切口疝修补术后的疼痛治疗中有效。
Hernia. 2017 Oct;21(5):677-685. doi: 10.1007/s10029-017-1625-8. Epub 2017 May 30.
9
A modified Chevrel technique for ventral hernia repair: long-term results of a single centre cohort.一种改良的Chevrel技术用于腹疝修补:单中心队列的长期结果
Hernia. 2017 Aug;21(4):591-600. doi: 10.1007/s10029-017-1602-2. Epub 2017 Apr 13.
10
[Optimized approach to the surgical treatment of patients with large and giant postoperative ventral hernia].[大型和巨大型术后腹疝患者手术治疗的优化方法]
Khirurgiia (Mosk). 2019(9):38-43. doi: 10.17116/hirurgia201909138.

引用本文的文献

1
ExtrAperitoneaL Plasty vs Intraperitoneal oNlay mEsh in ventral hernia repair - a multi-center randomized controlled trial: the ALPINE study protocol.腹外修补术与腹内补片修补术治疗腹疝的多中心随机对照试验:ALPINE研究方案
Int J Surg Protoc. 2024 Sep 28;28(4):1-6. doi: 10.1097/SP9.0000000000000030. eCollection 2024 Oct 21.
2
Comparison of Laparoscopic eTEP-RS/TAR and IPOM Techniques for Ventral Hernia Repair.腹腔镜下经腹外斜肌腱膜下修补术/肌后修补术与腹腔内补片植入修补术治疗腹疝的比较
J Abdom Wall Surg. 2025 Apr 25;4:14176. doi: 10.3389/jaws.2025.14176. eCollection 2025.
3
Early postoperative outcomes in a retrospective propensity score-matched comparison of robotic extended totally extraperitoneal (r-eTEP) and extended totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) repair for ventral hernia.
在一项针对腹疝的机器人扩大完全腹膜外修补术(r-eTEP)与扩大完全腹膜外修补术(eTEP)的回顾性倾向评分匹配比较中的早期术后结果。
Hernia. 2025 Mar 12;29(1):119. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03293-z.
4
Mapping the therapeutic landscape in emergency incisional hernia: a scoping review.绘制急诊切口疝的治疗前景:一项范围综述
Hernia. 2025 Feb 18;29(1):102. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03278-y.
5
Comparison of eTEP and IPOM for ventral hernia surgery in the early postoperative period: a retrospective cohort study of a tertiary university centre.对比 eTEP 和 IPOM 在腹疝手术后早期的效果:一所三级大学中心的回顾性队列研究。
Hernia. 2024 Dec;28(6):2195-2206. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03125-6. Epub 2024 Sep 16.
6
Comparison of short-term outcomes following robotic ventral hernia repair in patients with obesity: a review of 9742 patients from the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative database.肥胖患者机器人腹疝修补术后短期结局的比较:来自腹部核心健康质量协作数据库的 9742 例患者的回顾。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Jun 25;18(1):265. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-02021-6.
7
Comparison between the open and the laparoscopic approach in the primary ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.开放与腹腔镜下腹壁疝修补术的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Feb 3;409(1):52. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03241-y.
8
Recurrence in ventral abdominal wall hernias treated using semiabsorbable hybrid meshes.使用半可吸收混合补片治疗腹前壁疝的复发情况。
Updates Surg. 2024 Jan;76(1):325-326. doi: 10.1007/s13304-023-01635-z. Epub 2023 Oct 2.
9
Comparison of outcomes of the extended-view totally extraperitoneal rives-stoppa (eTEP-RS) and the intraperitoneal onlay mesh with defect closure (IPOM-plus) for W1-W2 midline incisional hernia repair-a single-center experience.扩大视野完全腹膜外Rives-Stoppa术(eTEP-RS)与腹腔内置片修补术(IPOM-plus)治疗W1-W2型中线切口疝的疗效比较——单中心经验
Surg Endosc. 2023 Apr;37(4):3260-3271. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-09922-x. Epub 2023 Feb 10.
10
Major complications and mortality after ventral hernia repair: an eleven-year Swedish nationwide cohort study.腹外疝修补术后的主要并发症和死亡率:一项十一年的瑞典全国队列研究。
BMC Surg. 2022 Dec 13;22(1):426. doi: 10.1186/s12893-022-01873-9.