• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹外修补术与腹内补片修补术治疗腹疝的多中心随机对照试验:ALPINE研究方案

ExtrAperitoneaL Plasty vs Intraperitoneal oNlay mEsh in ventral hernia repair - a multi-center randomized controlled trial: the ALPINE study protocol.

作者信息

Süsstrunk Julian, Baur Johannes, Sortino Rosita, Filser Jörg, Herzog Kim, Steinemann Daniel C, Müller Beat P, Angehrn Fiorenzo V

机构信息

Clarunis, Department of Visceral Surgery, University Digestive Health Care Center, St. Clara Hospital and University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

Discipline of Surgery, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Surg Protoc. 2024 Sep 28;28(4):1-6. doi: 10.1097/SP9.0000000000000030. eCollection 2024 Oct 21.

DOI:10.1097/SP9.0000000000000030
PMID:40453465
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12124376/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Minimally invasive ventral hernia repair (MIVHR) is a frequently performed surgical procedure to address primary or incisional ventral hernias and is recommended by numerous societies. Various techniques are available for MIVHR, including the intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) procedure and the enhanced view totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) approach. While both techniques are increasingly applied, they continue to be subject of controversy in literature. Well-designed randomized controlled trials comparing both procedures are lacking. The objective of this study is to investigate whether eTEP is associated with a decreased level of postoperative pain compared to IPOM.

METHODS

This is a prospective, multi-center, randomized, and blinded controlled trial. Patients presenting with primary or incisional epigastric, umbilical, or infraumbilical hernia with a transverse diameter >1 cm and ≤4 cm, or multiple hernias with a cumulative transverse diameter ≤4 cm, will be randomly assigned to undergo either IPOM or eTEP procedures. All patients and assessors of the study outcomes are blinded to the treatment allocation. The trial will be conducted at the St. Clara Hospital Basel, at the University Hospital Basel (Switzerland) and at the Innklinikum Altötting (Germany). It remains open for additional sites to be included. The multi-center design is chosen to minimize environmental bias related to perioperative anesthesiology and nursing care and to enhance participant recruitment. The primary outcome of this study is to evaluate postoperative pain (numeric rating scale and Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Pain Intensity Short Form 3a) 24 hours after the surgical procedure. Secondary outcomes include the assessment of pain at different times, length of hospital stay, operative time, readmission rate, intraoperative, and postoperative adverse events.

摘要

引言

微创腹疝修补术(MIVHR)是一种常用于治疗原发性或切口性腹疝的外科手术,众多学会都推荐该手术。MIVHR有多种技术可供选择,包括腹腔内补片植入术(IPOM)和强化视野完全腹膜外修补术(eTEP)。虽然这两种技术的应用越来越广泛,但在文献中它们仍然是争议的焦点。缺乏比较这两种手术的精心设计的随机对照试验。本研究的目的是调查与IPOM相比,eTEP是否与术后疼痛程度降低相关。

方法

这是一项前瞻性、多中心、随机、双盲对照试验。患有原发性或切口性上腹部、脐部或脐下疝,横径>1 cm且≤4 cm,或多个疝累计横径≤4 cm的患者,将被随机分配接受IPOM或eTEP手术。所有患者和研究结果评估者均对治疗分配不知情。该试验将在巴塞尔圣克拉拉医院、巴塞尔大学医院(瑞士)和阿尔特廷根医院(德国)进行。仍开放纳入其他地点。选择多中心设计是为了尽量减少与围手术期麻醉和护理相关的环境偏倚,并增加参与者招募。本研究的主要结果是评估手术后24小时的术后疼痛(数字评分量表和患者报告结局测量信息系统疼痛强度简表3a)。次要结果包括不同时间的疼痛评估、住院时间、手术时间、再入院率、术中及术后不良事件。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4993/12124376/40ec3c1342ee/sp9-28-1c-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4993/12124376/52eba18019dc/sp9-28-1c-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4993/12124376/40ec3c1342ee/sp9-28-1c-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4993/12124376/52eba18019dc/sp9-28-1c-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4993/12124376/40ec3c1342ee/sp9-28-1c-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
ExtrAperitoneaL Plasty vs Intraperitoneal oNlay mEsh in ventral hernia repair - a multi-center randomized controlled trial: the ALPINE study protocol.腹外修补术与腹内补片修补术治疗腹疝的多中心随机对照试验:ALPINE研究方案
Int J Surg Protoc. 2024 Sep 28;28(4):1-6. doi: 10.1097/SP9.0000000000000030. eCollection 2024 Oct 21.
2
Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh (IPOM Plus) Repair Versus Extended-View Totally Extraperitoneal Rives-Stoppa (eTEP-RS) Repair in Primary Ventral Hernias: Experience With 50 Cases in a Tertiary Care Hospital.原发性腹直肌旁疝的腹膜内补片植入修补术(IPOM Plus)与扩大视野完全腹膜外Rives-Stoppa修补术(eTEP-RS):一家三级医院50例病例的经验
Cureus. 2024 Apr 5;16(4):e57678. doi: 10.7759/cureus.57678. eCollection 2024 Apr.
3
The Comparison of eTEP and IPOM in Ventral and Incisional Hernia Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.eTEP 与 IPOM 在腹疝和切口疝修补中的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2022 Jan 17;32(2):252-258. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000001035.
4
Comparing procedural costs and early clinical outcomes of robotic extended totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) with intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) repair for midline ventral hernias.比较机器人辅助完全腹膜外(eTEP)与腹膜内补片修补术(IPOM)治疗中线腹疝的手术成本和早期临床结果。
Surg Endosc. 2025 Jan;39(1):604-613. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11319-3. Epub 2024 Oct 28.
5
Comparison of outcomes of the extended-view totally extraperitoneal rives-stoppa (eTEP-RS) and the intraperitoneal onlay mesh with defect closure (IPOM-plus) for W1-W2 midline incisional hernia repair-a single-center experience.扩大视野完全腹膜外Rives-Stoppa术(eTEP-RS)与腹腔内置片修补术(IPOM-plus)治疗W1-W2型中线切口疝的疗效比较——单中心经验
Surg Endosc. 2023 Apr;37(4):3260-3271. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-09922-x. Epub 2023 Feb 10.
6
A randomised control trial study of early post-operative pain and intraoperative surgeon workload following laparoscopic mesh repair of midline ventral hernia by enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal and intraperitoneal onlay mesh plus approach.一项关于通过增强视野完全腹膜外和腹膜内补片覆盖加 approach 法进行腹腔镜中线腹疝修补术后早期疼痛和术中外科医生工作量的随机对照试验研究。
J Minim Access Surg. 2023 Jul-Sep;19(3):427-432. doi: 10.4103/jmas.jmas_32_23.
7
IPOM versus eTEP as minimally invasive approaches for ventral/incisional hernias: a systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔内补片修补术(IPOM)与内镜经腹膜前修补术(eTEP)作为腹侧/切口疝的微创治疗方法:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Hernia. 2025 Apr 14;29(1):144. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03319-6.
8
Endoscopic enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal retromuscular approach for ventral hernia repair.内镜增强视野完全腹膜外肌后入路治疗腹外疝。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Nov;33(11):3749-3756. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06669-2. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
9
Comparison of Laparoscopic eTEP-RS/TAR and IPOM Techniques for Ventral Hernia Repair.腹腔镜下经腹外斜肌腱膜下修补术/肌后修补术与腹腔内补片植入修补术治疗腹疝的比较
J Abdom Wall Surg. 2025 Apr 25;4:14176. doi: 10.3389/jaws.2025.14176. eCollection 2025.
10
A comparative study between ETEP vs. IPOM repair for ventral hernia.经脐单孔腹腔镜完全腹膜外修补术(ETEP)与腹腔内补片修补术(IPOM)治疗腹疝的对比研究
Hernia. 2025 Feb 7;29(1):88. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03280-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison between the open and the laparoscopic approach in the primary ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.开放与腹腔镜下腹壁疝修补术的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Feb 3;409(1):52. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03241-y.
2
Robotic eTEP versus IPOM evaluation: the REVEAL multicenter randomized clinical trial.机器人经肛内镜前列腺切除术与经肛微创前列腺切除术评估:REVEAL 多中心随机临床试验。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Mar;37(3):2143-2153. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09722-9. Epub 2022 Nov 2.
3
Comparison of extended totally extra peritoneal (eTEP) vs intra peritoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) repair for management of primary and incisional hernia in terms of early outcomes and cost effectiveness-a randomized controlled trial.
对比完全腹膜外(eTEP)与经腹腔内补片置入术(IPOM)在原发性和切口疝治疗中的早期结果和成本效益:一项随机对照试验。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Oct;36(10):7494-7502. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09180-3. Epub 2022 Mar 11.
4
The Comparison of eTEP and IPOM in Ventral and Incisional Hernia Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.eTEP 与 IPOM 在腹疝和切口疝修补中的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2022 Jan 17;32(2):252-258. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000001035.
5
Intraperitoneal versus extraperitoneal mesh in minimally invasive ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经腹与经腹膜外补片在微创腹外疝修补术中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hernia. 2022 Apr;26(2):533-541. doi: 10.1007/s10029-021-02530-5. Epub 2021 Nov 20.
6
Excess Body Weight and Abdominal Hernia.超重与腹疝
Visc Med. 2021 Aug;37(4):246-253. doi: 10.1159/000516047. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
7
Incidence and risk factors for incisional hernia and recurrence: Retrospective analysis of the French national database.切口疝和复发的发生率和危险因素:法国国家数据库的回顾性分析。
Colorectal Dis. 2021 Jun;23(6):1515-1523. doi: 10.1111/codi.15581. Epub 2021 Apr 5.
8
Guidelines for treatment of umbilical and epigastric hernias from the European Hernia Society and Americas Hernia Society.欧洲疝学会和美洲疝学会关于脐疝和腹疝治疗的指南。
Br J Surg. 2020 Feb;107(3):171-190. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11489. Epub 2020 Jan 9.
9
Update of Guidelines for laparoscopic treatment of ventral and incisional abdominal wall hernias (International Endohernia Society (IEHS)): Part B.腹腔镜治疗腹侧和切口腹壁疝指南更新(国际腹内疝学会 (IEHS)):B 部分。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Nov;33(11):3511-3549. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06908-6. Epub 2019 Jul 10.
10
Update of Guidelines for laparoscopic treatment of ventral and incisional abdominal wall hernias (International Endohernia Society (IEHS))-Part A.腹腔镜治疗腹前壁和切口疝指南更新(国际腹内疝学会(IEHS))-A 部分。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Oct;33(10):3069-3139. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06907-7. Epub 2019 Jun 27.