Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455; email:
Vascular Biology and Hypertension Program, Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35294; email:
Annu Rev Med. 2018 Jan 29;69:81-95. doi: 10.1146/annurev-med-050416-024516.
The Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial is the first large prospective randomized controlled trial to demonstrate the benefit of an intensive systolic blood pressure (SBP) treatment target (<120 mm Hg) compared to a standard target (<140 mm Hg) in reducing cardiovascular morbidity and mortality and all-cause mortality in high-risk hypertensive patients. The impact of SPRINT on hypertension treatment has been large, but major questions remain about the feasibility of achieving the SPRINT intensive SBP target in routine practice, the generalizability of the SPRINT findings to hypertensive populations that were excluded from the trial, and the cost effectiveness of adopting the SPRINT intensive treatment goal. In this review, we discuss the generalizability of SPRINT data to the general population of adults with hypertension and with various comorbidities, the cost effectiveness of intensive SBP-lowering therapy, and the implications of SPRINT for future hypertension guideline development and clinical practice.
收缩压干预试验是首个大型前瞻性随机对照试验,旨在证明与标准目标(<140 mmHg)相比,强化收缩压(SBP)治疗目标(<120 mmHg)可降低高危高血压患者的心血管发病率和死亡率以及全因死亡率。SPRINT 对高血压治疗的影响是巨大的,但仍存在一些重大问题,例如在常规实践中实现 SPRINT 强化 SBP 目标的可行性、SPRINT 研究结果对试验排除的高血压人群的普遍性,以及采用 SPRINT 强化治疗目标的成本效益。在这篇综述中,我们讨论了 SPRINT 数据对一般高血压人群以及伴有各种合并症的成年人的普遍性、强化 SBP 降压治疗的成本效益,以及 SPRINT 对未来高血压指南制定和临床实践的影响。