Chittawatanarat Kaweesak, Orrapin Sariphat, Jitkaroon Karuna, Mueakwan Sirirat, Sroison Ubolrat
Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital, Sripume district, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Surgical Intensive Care and Critical Care Unit, Division of Surgical Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital, Sripume, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Med Arch. 2018 Feb;72(1):51-57. doi: 10.5455/medarh.2018.72.51-57.
The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of continuous low pressure support (PSV) and T-piece as strategies for discontinuation of mechanical ventilation and extubation in a surgical ICU.
This was a prospective open label randomized control study in surgical ICU patients who were intubated, mechanically ventilated, and who met criteria for a spontaneous breathing trial. Eligible, enrolled patients were randomized to receive low-level pressure supportup to 7 cmH2O (PSV) or T-piece as the mode of their spontaneous breathing trial.
A total of 520 patients were randomized (260 in PSV group and 260 in T-piece group). There were no differences between the groups in baseline characteristics except duration of MV before trial was longer in PSV group. There were also no differences in hemodynamic and respiratory measures between groups. The PSV had a significant higher number of SBT attempt before success and extubation. After extubation, the re-intubation within 48 hours had a lower trend in PSV group (PSV vs. T-piece: 10% vs. 14.6%; p=0.11). The pneumonia occurrence, hospital mortality, hospital and ICU length of stay were not significant different between groups. In multivariable analysis, PSV was associated with a lower risk of success at the first SBT (adjusted relative risk, RR 0.79 [95% confidence interval, CI, 0.70 - 0.88]; p<0.001], and a lower risk of re-intubation within 48 hours after extubation (adjusted RR 0.62 [95%CI 0.40 - 0.98]; p=0.04). There were no differences between groups in pneumonia after extubation and in hospital mortality rate.
Although PSV needs a higher number of SBT trial before success and extubation, the re-intubation within 48 hours is lower than T piece. However, there were no differences between the groups in term of pneumonia after extubation, hospital mortality as well as ICU and hospital length of stay.
本研究旨在比较持续低压力支持(PSV)和T形管作为外科重症监护病房(ICU)中机械通气撤机和拔管策略的疗效。
这是一项针对外科ICU中已插管、接受机械通气且符合自主呼吸试验标准患者的前瞻性开放标签随机对照研究。符合条件并入选的患者被随机分为接受最高7 cmH₂O的低水平压力支持(PSV)或T形管作为自主呼吸试验模式。
共有520例患者被随机分组(PSV组260例,T形管组260例)。除试验前机械通气时间PSV组较长外,两组基线特征无差异。两组间血流动力学和呼吸指标也无差异。PSV组成功和拔管前自主呼吸试验尝试次数显著更多。拔管后,PSV组48小时内再次插管趋势较低(PSV组与T形管组:10%对14.6%;p = 0.11)。两组间肺炎发生率、医院死亡率、住院时间和ICU住院时间无显著差异。多变量分析中,PSV与首次自主呼吸试验成功风险较低相关(调整相对风险,RR 0.79 [95%置信区间,CI,0.70 - 0.88];p < 0.001),且与拔管后48小时内再次插管风险较低相关(调整RR 0.62 [95%CI 0.40 - 0.98];p = 0.04)。两组间拔管后肺炎和医院死亡率无差异。
尽管PSV在成功和拔管前需要更多次自主呼吸试验尝试,但48小时内再次插管率低于T形管。然而,两组间在拔管后肺炎、医院死亡率以及ICU和住院时间方面无差异。