Comment on "Hysteropreservation versus hysterectomy in the surgical treatment of uterine prolapse: systematic review and meta-analysis".
作者信息
Detollenaere Renée J, van Eijndhoven Hugo W F
机构信息
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Isala, PO Box 10400, 8000, Zwolle, GK, Netherlands.
出版信息
Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Apr;29(4):603. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3553-2. Epub 2018 Feb 7.
PMID:29417161
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Comment on "Hysteropreservation versus hysterectomy in the surgical treatment of uterine prolapse: systematic review and meta-analysis".
Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Apr;29(4):603. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3553-2. Epub 2018 Feb 7.
2
Comment on "Hysteropreservation versus hysterectomy in the surgical treatment of uterine prolapse: systematic review and meta-analysis".
Int Urogynecol J. 2017 Nov;28(11):1761. doi: 10.1007/s00192-017-3484-3. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
3
Hysteropreservation versus hysterectomy in the surgical treatment of uterine prolapse: systematic review and meta-analyses.
Int Urogynecol J. 2017 Nov;28(11):1763. doi: 10.1007/s00192-017-3494-1. Epub 2017 Oct 7.
4
Hysteropreservation versus hysterectomy in the surgical treatment of uterine prolapse: systematic review and meta-analysis.子宫脱垂手术治疗中子宫保留术与子宫切除术的比较：系统评价与荟萃分析
Int Urogynecol J. 2017 Nov;28(11):1617-1630. doi: 10.1007/s00192-017-3433-1. Epub 2017 Aug 5.
5
Letter to the editor: Hysteropreservation versus hysterectomy in uterine prolapse surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Int Urogynecol J. 2022 Oct;33(10):2913-2914. doi: 10.1007/s00192-022-05330-2. Epub 2022 Aug 24.
6
Hysteropreservation versus hysterectomy in uterine prolapse surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.子宫脱垂手术中子宫保留与子宫切除术的比较：系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int Urogynecol J. 2022 Jul;33(7):1917-1925. doi: 10.1007/s00192-021-04913-9. Epub 2021 Jul 2.
7
The accuracy of comparing laparoscopic hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy for the treatment of uterovaginal prolapse.
Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Jun;29(6):923. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3614-6. Epub 2018 Mar 19.
8
The Manchester procedure versus vaginal hysterectomy in the treatment of uterine prolapse: a review.曼彻斯特手术与经阴道子宫切除术治疗子宫脱垂的疗效综述
Int Urogynecol J. 2017 Jan;28(1):33-40. doi: 10.1007/s00192-016-3100-y. Epub 2016 Aug 2.
9
Modification of the vaginal hysterectomy technique for the treatment of uterine prolapse.改良阴道子宫切除术治疗子宫脱垂的技术
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1961 Sep;82:544-8. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(61)90268-x.
10
Discussion of the role of vaginal hysterectomy in treatment of prolapse.阴道子宫切除术在脱垂治疗中的作用探讨。
Proc R Soc Med. 1948 Oct;41(10):676. doi: 10.1177/003591574804101013.
本文引用的文献
1
Hysteropreservation versus hysterectomy in the surgical treatment of uterine prolapse: systematic review and meta-analyses.
Int Urogynecol J. 2017 Nov;28(11):1763. doi: 10.1007/s00192-017-3494-1. Epub 2017 Oct 7.
2
Comment on "Hysteropreservation versus hysterectomy in the surgical treatment of uterine prolapse: systematic review and meta-analysis".
Int Urogynecol J. 2017 Nov;28(11):1761. doi: 10.1007/s00192-017-3484-3. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
3
Hysteropreservation versus hysterectomy in the surgical treatment of uterine prolapse: systematic review and meta-analysis.子宫脱垂手术治疗中子宫保留术与子宫切除术的比较：系统评价与荟萃分析
Int Urogynecol J. 2017 Nov;28(11):1617-1630. doi: 10.1007/s00192-017-3433-1. Epub 2017 Aug 5.
4
5
One-year follow-up after sacrospinous hysteropexy and vaginal hysterectomy for uterine descent: a randomized study.骶棘韧带子宫固定术和经阴道子宫切除术治疗子宫脱垂的一年随访：一项随机研究
Int Urogynecol J. 2010 Feb;21(2):209-16. doi: 10.1007/s00192-009-1014-7. Epub 2009 Oct 16.
Zotero 插件