• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Letter to the editor: Hysteropreservation versus hysterectomy in uterine prolapse surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Husby Karen Ruben, Lose Gunnar, Klarskov Niels

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Herlev and Gentofte University Hospital, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, 2730, Herlev, Denmark.

Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Int Urogynecol J. 2022 Oct;33(10):2913-2914. doi: 10.1007/s00192-022-05330-2. Epub 2022 Aug 24.

DOI:10.1007/s00192-022-05330-2
PMID:36001097
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Letter to the editor: Hysteropreservation versus hysterectomy in uterine prolapse surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Int Urogynecol J. 2022 Oct;33(10):2913-2914. doi: 10.1007/s00192-022-05330-2. Epub 2022 Aug 24.
2
Comment on "Hysteropreservation versus hysterectomy in the surgical treatment of uterine prolapse: systematic review and meta-analysis".
Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Apr;29(4):603. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3553-2. Epub 2018 Feb 7.
3
Hysteropreservation versus hysterectomy in the surgical treatment of uterine prolapse: systematic review and meta-analysis.子宫脱垂手术治疗中子宫保留术与子宫切除术的比较：系统评价与荟萃分析
Int Urogynecol J. 2017 Nov;28(11):1617-1630. doi: 10.1007/s00192-017-3433-1. Epub 2017 Aug 5.
4
Comment on "Hysteropreservation versus hysterectomy in the surgical treatment of uterine prolapse: systematic review and meta-analysis".
Int Urogynecol J. 2017 Nov;28(11):1761. doi: 10.1007/s00192-017-3484-3. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
5
Hysteropreservation versus hysterectomy in the surgical treatment of uterine prolapse: systematic review and meta-analyses.
Int Urogynecol J. 2017 Nov;28(11):1763. doi: 10.1007/s00192-017-3494-1. Epub 2017 Oct 7.
6
Hysteropreservation versus hysterectomy in uterine prolapse surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.子宫脱垂手术中子宫保留与子宫切除术的比较：系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int Urogynecol J. 2022 Jul;33(7):1917-1925. doi: 10.1007/s00192-021-04913-9. Epub 2021 Jul 2.
7
Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: observational follow-up of a multicentre randomised trial.骶棘韧带固定术与阴道子宫切除术联合子宫骶骨韧带悬吊术治疗 2 度或以上子宫脱垂的疗效比较：多中心随机试验的随访观察。
BMJ. 2019 Sep 10;366:l5149. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l5149.
8
Modification of the vaginal hysterectomy technique for the treatment of uterine prolapse.改良阴道子宫切除术治疗子宫脱垂的技术
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1961 Sep;82:544-8. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(61)90268-x.
9
Cervical amputation versus vaginal hysterectomy: a population-based register study.宫颈切除术与经阴道子宫切除术：一项基于人群的登记研究。
Int Urogynecol J. 2017 Feb;28(2):257-266. doi: 10.1007/s00192-016-3119-0. Epub 2016 Aug 16.
10
[Uterine preservation or not during prolapse surgery: Review of the literature].
Prog Urol. 2019 Dec;29(17):1021-1034. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2019.05.001. Epub 2019 May 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Recurrent surgery in uterine prolapse: A nationwide register study.复发性子宫脱垂手术：一项全国性登记研究。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2022 May;101(5):532-541. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14340. Epub 2022 Mar 7.
2
Hysteropreservation versus hysterectomy in uterine prolapse surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.子宫脱垂手术中子宫保留与子宫切除术的比较：系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int Urogynecol J. 2022 Jul;33(7):1917-1925. doi: 10.1007/s00192-021-04913-9. Epub 2021 Jul 2.
3
Surgical treatment of primary uterine prolapse: a comparison of vaginal native tissue surgical techniques.
原发性子宫脱垂的外科治疗：阴道自体组织手术技术的比较
Int Urogynecol J. 2019 Nov;30(11):1887-1893. doi: 10.1007/s00192-019-03950-9. Epub 2019 May 3.
4
No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations.未经评估，不得进行手术创新：IDEAL 建议
Lancet. 2009 Sep 26;374(9695):1105-12. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61116-8.