Suppr超能文献

支持生物医学领域的共享假设检验。

Supporting shared hypothesis testing in the biomedical domain.

作者信息

Agibetov Asan, Jiménez-Ruiz Ernesto, Ondrésik Marta, Solimando Alessandro, Banerjee Imon, Guerrini Giovanna, Catalano Chiara E, Oliveira Joaquim M, Patanè Giuseppe, Reis Rui L, Spagnuolo Michela

机构信息

Italian National Research Council, Via De Marini 6, Genoa, 16149, Italy.

Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Intelligent Systems, Institute for Artificial Intelligence and Decision Support, Medical University of Vienna, Spitalgasse 23, Vienna, 1090, Austria.

出版信息

J Biomed Semantics. 2018 Feb 8;9(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s13326-018-0177-x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pathogenesis of inflammatory diseases can be tracked by studying the causality relationships among the factors contributing to its development. We could, for instance, hypothesize on the connections of the pathogenesis outcomes to the observed conditions. And to prove such causal hypotheses we would need to have the full understanding of the causal relationships, and we would have to provide all the necessary evidences to support our claims. In practice, however, we might not possess all the background knowledge on the causality relationships, and we might be unable to collect all the evidence to prove our hypotheses.

RESULTS

In this work we propose a methodology for the translation of biological knowledge on causality relationships of biological processes and their effects on conditions to a computational framework for hypothesis testing. The methodology consists of two main points: hypothesis graph construction from the formalization of the background knowledge on causality relationships, and confidence measurement in a causality hypothesis as a normalized weighted path computation in the hypothesis graph. In this framework, we can simulate collection of evidences and assess confidence in a causality hypothesis by measuring it proportionally to the amount of available knowledge and collected evidences.

CONCLUSIONS

We evaluate our methodology on a hypothesis graph that represents both contributing factors which may cause cartilage degradation and the factors which might be caused by the cartilage degradation during osteoarthritis. Hypothesis graph construction has proven to be robust to the addition of potentially contradictory information on the simultaneously positive and negative effects. The obtained confidence measures for the specific causality hypotheses have been validated by our domain experts, and, correspond closely to their subjective assessments of confidences in investigated hypotheses. Overall, our methodology for a shared hypothesis testing framework exhibits important properties that researchers will find useful in literature review for their experimental studies, planning and prioritizing evidence collection acquisition procedures, and testing their hypotheses with different depths of knowledge on causal dependencies of biological processes and their effects on the observed conditions.

摘要

背景

炎症性疾病的发病机制可通过研究促成其发展的因素之间的因果关系来追踪。例如,我们可以对发病机制结果与观察到的状况之间的联系进行假设。为了证明这些因果假设,我们需要全面理解因果关系,并且必须提供所有必要的证据来支持我们的主张。然而,在实践中,我们可能并不具备关于因果关系的所有背景知识,也可能无法收集到所有证据来证明我们的假设。

结果

在这项工作中,我们提出了一种方法,用于将关于生物过程因果关系及其对状况影响的生物学知识转化为用于假设检验的计算框架。该方法包括两个要点:从因果关系背景知识的形式化构建假设图,以及将因果假设中的置信度测量作为假设图中的归一化加权路径计算。在此框架中,我们可以模拟证据收集,并通过根据可用知识和收集到的证据量按比例测量来评估因果假设的置信度。

结论

我们在一个假设图上评估了我们的方法,该假设图既表示可能导致软骨降解的促成因素,也表示骨关节炎期间可能由软骨降解引起的因素。事实证明,假设图构建对于同时具有正负效应的潜在矛盾信息的添加具有鲁棒性。特定因果假设的置信度测量结果已得到我们领域专家的验证,并且与他们对所研究假设的置信度主观评估密切相关。总体而言,我们用于共享假设检验框架的方法具有重要特性,研究人员会发现这些特性在其实验研究的文献综述、规划和优先排序证据收集获取程序以及用关于生物过程因果依赖性及其对观察到的状况影响的不同深度知识来检验假设方面很有用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d3d/5804102/cf0ca0994a88/13326_2018_177_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验