• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

年龄相关人格差异的验证性研究:使用蚁群优化方法得出与年龄相关的测量不变解。

A confirmatory examination of age-associated personality differences: Deriving age-related measurement-invariant solutions using ant colony optimization.

机构信息

University of Kassel.

Ulm University.

出版信息

J Pers. 2018 Dec;86(6):1037-1049. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12373. Epub 2018 Mar 8.

DOI:10.1111/jopy.12373
PMID:29425409
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to examine age-associated personality differences using a measurement-invariant representation of the higher-order structure of the Five-Factor Model.

METHOD

We reanalyzed the German NEO-PI-R norm sample (N = 11,724) and applied ant colony optimization in a multigroup confirmatory factor analysis setting in order to select three items per first-order factor that would optimize model fit and measurement invariance across 18 age groups ranging from 16 to 65 years of age.

RESULTS

Ant colony optimization substantially improved absolute and relative model fit under measurement invariance constraints. However, the results showed that even when selecting items, measurement invariance across a large age span could not be guaranteed. Strong measurement invariance for Extraversion and Agreeableness could not be established. The age-associated mean-level differences of the first-order factors of Neuroticism and Conscientiousness supported the maturity hypothesis. The mean levels of the first-order factors of Openness varied substantially from each other across age.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings on age differences in personality can be particularly distorted in older age groups. Testing for and ensuring measurement invariance with item selection procedures can help solve this problem. The higher-order structure of personality should be accounted for when personality development is examined.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在使用五因素模型高阶结构的测量不变表示来检验与年龄相关的人格差异。

方法

我们重新分析了德国 NEO-PI-R 常模样本(N=11724),并在多群组验证性因素分析环境中应用蚁群优化,以便为 16 至 65 岁的 18 个年龄组中的每个一阶因子选择三个项目,从而在测量不变的情况下优化模型拟合和测量不变性。

结果

蚁群优化极大地提高了测量不变性约束下的绝对和相对模型拟合度。然而,结果表明,即使选择项目,也不能保证在很大的年龄范围内保持测量不变性。无法为外向性和宜人性建立强测量不变性。神经质和尽责性的一阶因子的与年龄相关的平均水平差异支持成熟假设。开放性的一阶因子的平均水平在不同年龄组之间存在显著差异。

结论

人格的年龄差异的发现可能会在年龄较大的年龄组中受到特别的扭曲。通过测试并使用项目选择程序确保测量不变性,可以帮助解决这个问题。在研究人格发展时,应考虑人格的高阶结构。

相似文献

1
A confirmatory examination of age-associated personality differences: Deriving age-related measurement-invariant solutions using ant colony optimization.年龄相关人格差异的验证性研究:使用蚁群优化方法得出与年龄相关的测量不变解。
J Pers. 2018 Dec;86(6):1037-1049. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12373. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
2
[Does the French Big Five Inventory evaluate facets other than the Big Five factors?].[法国大五人格量表是否评估了大五人格因素以外的其他方面?]
Encephale. 2018 Jun;44(3):208-214. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2017.02.004. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
3
A new look at the big five factor structure through exploratory structural equation modeling.通过探索性结构方程建模重新审视大五因素结构。
Psychol Assess. 2010 Sep;22(3):471-91. doi: 10.1037/a0019227.
4
Factorial structure and age-related psychometrics of the MIDUS personality adjective items across the life span.人格形容词项目 MIDUS 跨生命周期的因子结构和与年龄相关的心理计量学。
Psychol Assess. 2012 Mar;24(1):173-86. doi: 10.1037/a0025265. Epub 2011 Sep 12.
5
The HEX-ACO-18: Developing an Age-Invariant HEXACO Short Scale Using Ant Colony Optimization.HEX-ACO-18:使用蚁群优化开发不变龄的 HEXACO 短量表。
J Pers Assess. 2022 Jul-Aug;104(4):435-446. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2021.1934480. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
6
Measurement invariance of big-five factors over the life span: ESEM tests of gender, age, plasticity, maturity, and la dolce vita effects.大五因素在整个生命周期中的测量不变性:性别、年龄、可塑性、成熟度和甜蜜生活效应的 ESEM 检验。
Dev Psychol. 2013 Jun;49(6):1194-1218. doi: 10.1037/a0026913. Epub 2012 Jan 16.
7
Normative personality trait development in adulthood: A 6-year cohort-sequential growth model.成年期规范人格特质的发展:一个6年队列序列增长模型。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2017 Mar;112(3):510-526. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000121. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
8
[Influence of personality traits on collage works].[人格特质对拼贴作品的影响]
Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 2004 Oct;75(4):365-70. doi: 10.4992/jjpsy.75.365.
9
The NEO Personality Inventory-Revised: factor structure and gender invariance from exploratory structural equation modeling analyses in a high-stakes setting.《大五人格量表修订版:在高风险环境下的探索性结构方程模型分析中的因子结构和性别不变性》。
Assessment. 2013 Feb;20(1):14-23. doi: 10.1177/1073191112448213. Epub 2012 Jul 26.
10
Personality traits in old age: measurement and rank-order stability and some mean-level change.老年期的人格特质:测量、等级稳定性及一些平均水平的变化。
Psychol Aging. 2012 Mar;27(1):243-249. doi: 10.1037/a0023690. Epub 2011 May 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Bergen social media engagement and experiences scale (Be-SMEE): A short questionnaire covering important experiences and perceptions of social media use among adolescents. Development and association with symptoms of depression and anxiety.卑尔根社交媒体参与度与体验量表(Be-SMEE):一份简短问卷,涵盖青少年使用社交媒体的重要体验和认知。该量表的编制及其与抑郁和焦虑症状的关联。
F1000Res. 2025 Sep 1;14:228. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.161622.3. eCollection 2025.
2
Detecting Idiographic Personality Change.探测个体人格变化。
J Pers Assess. 2022 Jul-Aug;104(4):467-483. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2021.1984246. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
3
Modern health worries: Deriving two measurement invariant short scales for cross-cultural research with Ant Colony Optimization.
现代健康担忧:利用蚁群优化方法衍生出两个具有测量不变性的短量表,用于跨文化研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 7;14(2):e0211819. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211819. eCollection 2019.