Section of Physical Education and Sports, Department of Sports and Computer Science, University Pablo de Olavide, 41013, Seville, Spain.
Matern Child Health J. 2018 Jul;22(7):968-977. doi: 10.1007/s10995-018-2473-6.
Objectives To quantify and compare the sedentary time estimated by the Sedentary Behavior Questionnaire (SBQ) and the sedentary time objectively measured by a multi-sensor monitor (SWA) in pregnant women. Methods One hundred eighty-six participants answered the SBQ and wore the SWA at least 7 valid days. The concordance, correlation, agreement and relative activity levels between both measures of sedentary time were examined. Differences of sedentary time between weekday and weekend and between groups stratified by sociodemographic and clinical characteristic were evaluated by one-way analysis of variance. Results Pregnant women were sedentary the 64% of their waking hours. Television viewing is the most prevalent sedentary behavior. The concordance, correlation, and agreement between SBQ and SWA were weak, yet a significant correlation in weekday and average day sedentary time (r = 0.23 and 0.20, P = 0.001 and 0.008, respectively) was observed. A significant linear trend was found for increasing sedentary time between both methods using a relative activity levels analysis. Conclusions for Practice Pregnant women experience high amount of sedentary time, for approximately half of the day. The SBQ shows a low validity and agreement, but strong ability to rank individuals compared with SWA in pregnant women.
目的 定量比较久坐行为问卷(SBQ)估计的久坐时间与多传感器监测仪(SWA)客观测量的孕妇久坐时间。
方法 186 名参与者回答了 SBQ 并佩戴 SWA 至少 7 天。检查了两种久坐时间测量方法之间的一致性、相关性、一致性和相对活动水平。通过单因素方差分析评估了工作日和周末之间以及按社会人口统计学和临床特征分层的组之间的久坐时间差异。
结果 孕妇清醒时的 64%时间处于久坐状态。看电视是最常见的久坐行为。SBQ 和 SWA 之间的一致性、相关性和一致性都很弱,但在工作日和平均日久坐时间上观察到显著的相关性(r=0.23 和 0.20,P=0.001 和 0.008)。使用相对活动水平分析,在两种方法之间发现了久坐时间随时间线性增加的显著趋势。
实践结论 孕妇每天大约有一半的时间处于久坐状态。SBQ 在孕妇中具有较低的有效性和一致性,但与 SWA 相比,具有较强的个体分级能力。