Ozveren N, Serindere G
Trakya University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Paediatrics Dentistry, Edirne, Turkey.
Mustafa Kemal University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Hatay, Turkey.
Forensic Sci Int. 2018 Apr;285:38-43. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.01.017. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
Dental age (DA) estimation is frequently used in the fields of orthodontics, paediatric dentistry and forensic science. DA estimation methods use radiology, and are reliable and non-destructive according to the literature. The Demirjian method is currently the most frequently used method, but recently, the Willems method was reported to have given results that were more accurate for some regions. The aim of this study was to detect and compare the accuracy of DA estimation methods for children and adolescents from the Thrace region, Turkey. The mean difference between the chronological age (CA) and the DA was selected as the primary outcome measure, and the difference range according to sex and age group was selected as the secondary outcome.
Panoramic radiographs (n=766) from a Thrace region population (380 males and 386 females) ranging in age from 6 to 14.99 years old were evaluated. DA was calculated using both the Demirjian and the Willems methods.
The mean CA of the subjects was 11.39±2.34 years (males=11.08±2.42 years and females=11.70±2.23 years). The mean difference values between the CA and the DA (CA-DA) using the Demirjian method and the Willems method were -0.87 and -0.17 for females, respectively, and -1.04 and -0.40 for males, respectively. For the different age groups, the differences between the CA and the DA calculated using the Demirjian method (CA-DA) ranged from -0.53 to -1.46 years for males and from -0.19 to -1.20 years for females, while the mean differences between the CA and the DA calculated by the Willems method (CA-DA) ranged from -0.19 to -0.50 years for males and from 0.20 to -0.49 years for females.
The results suggest that the Willems method produced more accurate results for almost all age groups of both sexes, and it is better suited for children from the Thrace region of Turkey, than the Demirjian method.
牙齿年龄(DA)估计在正畸学、儿童牙科和法医学领域中经常使用。DA估计方法采用放射学,根据文献报道,该方法可靠且无损。Demirjian方法是目前最常用的方法,但最近有报道称,Willems方法在某些地区给出的结果更准确。本研究的目的是检测和比较土耳其色雷斯地区儿童和青少年DA估计方法的准确性。将实际年龄(CA)与DA之间的平均差异作为主要结局指标,将根据性别和年龄组划分的差异范围作为次要结局。
对来自色雷斯地区、年龄在6至14.99岁之间的人群(380名男性和386名女性)的766张全景X线片进行评估。使用Demirjian方法和Willems方法计算DA。
受试者的平均CA为11.39±2.34岁(男性=11.08±2.42岁,女性=11.70±2.23岁)。使用Demirjian方法和Willems方法时,CA与DA之间的平均差异值(CA-DA),女性分别为-0.87和-0.17,男性分别为-1.04和-0.40。对于不同年龄组,使用Demirjian方法计算的CA与DA之间的差异(CA-DA),男性为-0.53至-1.46岁,女性为-0.19至-1.20岁;而使用Willems方法计算的CA与DA之间的平均差异,男性为-0.19至-0.50岁,女性为0.20至-0.49岁。
结果表明,对于几乎所有年龄组的男性和女性,Willems方法产生的结果更准确,并且比Demirjian方法更适合土耳其色雷斯地区的儿童。