• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“基于家庭优势计划”随机临床试验结果的一年随访

One Year Follow-up of Outcomes from the Randomized Clinical Trial of the Building on Family Strengths Program.

作者信息

Churchill Shervin S, Kieckhefer Gail M

机构信息

Family and Child Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195-7266, USA.

Nursing & Health Studies, University of Washington-Bothell, Bothell, WA, 98011, USA.

出版信息

Matern Child Health J. 2018 Jun;22(6):913-921. doi: 10.1007/s10995-018-2467-4.

DOI:10.1007/s10995-018-2467-4
PMID:29429134
Abstract

Objectives Test the 12-month efficacy of an inclusive non-diagnosis-specific, parent education program with seven in-person sessions. Methods Parents of 110 children, 2-11 years old, with a variety of special health care conditions, were recruited to participate in a randomized clinical trial. At twelve months data from 104 parents were available for longitudinal analysis. Linear mixed models, with the interaction term of group by time, were used to assess the efficacy of the intervention over 12 months using data from 3 time points: baseline, 6 and 12 months. The outcome measures were self-efficacy, parent and child shared management of chronic condition, coping skills, parental depressive symptoms and quality of life. Results All of the outcomes improved within the intervention group over 12 months. Self-efficacy was the strongest outcome which remained significantly different from the control group 12 months post intervention, without any statistical adjustment (p = 0.045). The coefficient of the interaction term for study group (intervention or control) by time, quantifying the intervention effect, was statistically significant for four of five pre-specified study outcomes, favorably so toward the intervention group (p < 0.05, with the 5th outcome, parental depression, p = 0.052). Conclusions for Practice The Building on Family Strengths intervention was efficacious in improving self-efficacy, shared management, coping skills, and quality of life and decreasing depressive symptoms in parents, in particular for parents who were most impacted by the lack of these strengths and skills at baseline. These results are encouraging and future studies to investigate the efficacy of this intervention in an Internet-based setting or other modalities are encouraged.

摘要

目的 测试一项包含七次面对面课程的、非特定诊断的家长教育项目的12个月疗效。方法 招募110名2至11岁患有各种特殊医疗状况的儿童的家长,参与一项随机临床试验。在12个月时,有104名家长的数据可用于纵向分析。使用带有组×时间交互项的线性混合模型,利用来自基线、6个月和12个月这3个时间点的数据,评估干预在12个月内的疗效。结果指标包括自我效能感、家长与孩子对慢性病的共同管理、应对技巧、家长抑郁症状和生活质量。结果 在12个月内,干预组的所有结果指标均有所改善。自我效能感是最显著的结果,在干预后12个月时与对照组仍存在显著差异,无需任何统计调整(p = 0.045)。研究组(干预组或对照组)×时间的交互项系数,量化了干预效果,对于预先设定的五项研究结果中的四项在统计学上具有显著意义,对干预组有利(p < 0.05,第五项结果家长抑郁,p = 0.052)。实践结论 “基于家庭优势”干预措施在提高自我效能感、共同管理、应对技巧和生活质量以及减轻家长的抑郁症状方面是有效的,特别是对于那些在基线时受这些优势和技能缺乏影响最大的家长。这些结果令人鼓舞,鼓励未来开展研究以调查该干预措施在基于互联网的环境或其他模式中的疗效。

相似文献

1
One Year Follow-up of Outcomes from the Randomized Clinical Trial of the Building on Family Strengths Program.“基于家庭优势计划”随机临床试验结果的一年随访
Matern Child Health J. 2018 Jun;22(6):913-921. doi: 10.1007/s10995-018-2467-4.
2
A randomized clinical trial of the building on family strengths program: an education program for parents of children with chronic health conditions.一项以家庭优势为基础的方案的随机临床试验:为慢性疾病儿童父母设计的教育方案。
Matern Child Health J. 2014 Apr;18(3):563-74. doi: 10.1007/s10995-013-1273-2.
3
Educational intervention for parents of adolescents with chronic illness: a pre-post test pilot study.针对慢性病青少年家长的教育干预:一项前后测试点研究。
Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2015 Aug;27(3):261-9. doi: 10.1515/ijamh-2014-0020.
4
The influence of the training and support programme on the self-efficacy and psychological well-being of parents of children with disabilities: a controlled trial.培训与支持项目对残疾儿童家长自我效能感和心理健康的影响:一项对照试验。
Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2006 Feb;12(1):55-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2005.02.005.
5
The effectiveness of the Training and Support Program for parents of children with disabilities: a randomized controlled trial.残疾儿童家长培训与支持项目的效果:一项随机对照试验。
J Psychosom Res. 2008 Jan;64(1):55-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2007.06.006.
6
Medication education program for Indian children with asthma: A feasibility stud.针对印度哮喘儿童的药物治疗教育项目:一项可行性研究。 (注:原文中“stud”可能有误,推测应为“study”)
Niger J Clin Pract. 2016 Jan-Feb;19(1):76-84. doi: 10.4103/1119-3077.173716.
7
A Randomized Controlled Trial Testing the Efficacy of the Creating Opportunities for Parent Empowerment Program for Parents of Children With Epilepsy and Other Chronic Neurological Conditions.一项随机对照试验,检验为癫痫及其他慢性神经疾病患儿家长开展的家长赋权创造机会项目的效果。
J Neurosci Nurs. 2016 Jun;48(3):166-74. doi: 10.1097/JNN.0000000000000199.
8
Internet-Assisted Parent Training Intervention for Disruptive Behavior in 4-Year-Old Children: A Randomized Clinical Trial.互联网辅助家长训练干预对 4 岁儿童行为障碍的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2016 Apr;73(4):378-87. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015.3411.
9
Twelve-Month Follow-Up of a Randomized Controlled Trial of Internet-Based Guided Self-Help for Parents of Children on Cancer Treatment.一项针对癌症治疗患儿家长的基于互联网的引导式自助干预随机对照试验的12个月随访
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Jul 27;19(7):e273. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6852.
10
Parental education and guided self-management of asthma and wheezing in the pre-school child: a randomised controlled trial.学龄前儿童哮喘和喘息的家长教育与自我管理指导:一项随机对照试验
Thorax. 2002 Jan;57(1):39-44. doi: 10.1136/thorax.57.1.39.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychological interventions for parents of children and adolescents with chronic illness.针对患有慢性病的儿童和青少年家长的心理干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Mar 18;3(3):CD009660. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009660.pub4.
2
CommunityRx: A Real-World Controlled Clinical Trial of a Scalable, Low-Intensity Community Resource Referral Intervention.社区 Rx:可扩展、低强度社区资源转介干预的真实世界对照临床试验。
Am J Public Health. 2019 Apr;109(4):600-606. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304905. Epub 2019 Feb 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Parent education programmes for special health care needs children: a systematic review.针对有特殊医疗需求儿童的家长教育项目:一项系统综述
J Clin Nurs. 2016 Jun;25(11-12):1528-47. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13178. Epub 2016 Apr 15.
2
A Randomized Controlled Trial to Increase HIV Preventive Information, Motivation, and Behavioral Skills in Ugandan Adolescents.一项增加乌干达青少年艾滋病毒预防信息、动机和行为技能的随机对照试验。
Ann Behav Med. 2015 Jun;49(3):473-85. doi: 10.1007/s12160-014-9673-0.
3
Cancer incidence rates and trends among children and adolescents in the United States, 2001-2009.
2001 - 2009年美国儿童及青少年的癌症发病率及趋势
Pediatrics. 2014 Oct;134(4):e945-55. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-3926. Epub 2014 Sep 8.
4
Parental limited English proficiency and health outcomes for children with special health care needs: a systematic review.父母英语水平有限与有特殊医疗需求儿童的健康状况:一项系统综述。
Acad Pediatr. 2014 Mar-Apr;14(2):128-36. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2013.10.003.
5
Parenting interventions for childhood chronic illness: a review and recommendations for intervention design and delivery.针对儿童慢性病的育儿干预措施:干预设计与实施的综述及建议
J Child Health Care. 2015 Mar;19(1):5-17. doi: 10.1177/1367493513496664. Epub 2014 Jan 31.
6
A randomized clinical trial of the building on family strengths program: an education program for parents of children with chronic health conditions.一项以家庭优势为基础的方案的随机临床试验:为慢性疾病儿童父母设计的教育方案。
Matern Child Health J. 2014 Apr;18(3):563-74. doi: 10.1007/s10995-013-1273-2.
7
Cancer Health Empowerment for Living without Pain (Ca-HELP): effects of a tailored education and coaching intervention on pain and impairment.癌症患者无痛生活赋能(Ca-HELP):个性化教育和辅导干预对疼痛和功能障碍的影响。
Pain. 2011 Jul;152(7):1572-1582. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2011.02.047. Epub 2011 Mar 24.
8
Online diabetes self-management program: a randomized study.在线糖尿病自我管理项目:一项随机研究。
Diabetes Care. 2010 Jun;33(6):1275-81. doi: 10.2337/dc09-2153. Epub 2010 Mar 18.
9
Managing childhood chronic illness: parent perspectives and implications for parent-provider relationships.管理儿童慢性病:家长的观点及其对家长与医疗服务提供者关系的影响。
Fam Syst Health. 2009 Dec;27(4):303-13. doi: 10.1037/a0018114.
10
Prevalence of Down syndrome among children and adolescents in 10 regions of the United States.美国10个地区儿童及青少年中唐氏综合征的患病率。
Pediatrics. 2009 Dec;124(6):1565-71. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-0745.