Suppr超能文献

格拉斯哥昏迷评分在小儿创伤患者中的可靠性。

Reliability of Glasgow Coma Score in pediatric trauma patients.

作者信息

DiBrito Sandra R, Cerullo Marcelo, Goldstein Seth D, Ziegfeld Susan, Stewart Dylan, Nasr Isam W

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe St, Tower 110, Baltimore, MD, USA 21287.

出版信息

J Pediatr Surg. 2018 Sep;53(9):1789-1794. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.12.027. Epub 2018 Jan 31.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Discordant assessments of Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) following trauma can result in inappropriate triage. This study sought to determine the reliability of prehospital GCS compared to emergency department (ED) GCS.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of traumas from 01/2000 to 12/2015 at a Level-1 pediatric trauma center. We evaluated reliability between field and ED GCS using Pearson's correlation. We ascertained the difference between prehospital and ED GCS (delta-GCS). Associations between patient characteristics and delta-GCS were modeled using Poisson and linear regression, adjusting for demographic and clinical covariates.

RESULTS

We identified 5306 patients. Pearson's correlation for GCS measurements was 0.57 for ages 0-3, and 0.67-0.77 for other age groups. Mean delta-GCS was highest for age<3years (0.95, SD=2.4). Poisson regression demonstrated that compared to children 0-3years, higher age was associated with lower delta-GCS (RR 0.65 95% CI 0.56-0.74). Linear regression showed that in those with a delta-GCS, more severe injury (higher ISS, worse ED disposition) and older age were associated with a negative change, signifying decline in score.

CONCLUSIONS

GCS is generally unreliable in pediatric trauma patients aged 0-3years, particularly the verbal score component. This may impact accuracy of triage priority for pediatric trauma patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, Prognostic.

摘要

背景

创伤后格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)评估结果不一致可能导致分诊不当。本研究旨在确定院前GCS与急诊科(ED)GCS相比的可靠性。

方法

我们对一家一级儿科创伤中心2000年1月至2015年12月期间的创伤病例进行了回顾性研究。我们使用Pearson相关性评估现场与急诊科GCS之间的可靠性。我们确定了院前与急诊科GCS之间的差异(GCS差值)。使用泊松回归和线性回归对患者特征与GCS差值之间的关联进行建模,并对人口统计学和临床协变量进行调整。

结果

我们纳入了5306例患者。0至3岁患者GCS测量值的Pearson相关性为0.57,其他年龄组为0.67至0.77。年龄<3岁的患者平均GCS差值最高(0.95,标准差=2.4)。泊松回归表明,与0至3岁儿童相比,年龄较大与较低的GCS差值相关(风险比0.65,95%置信区间0.56-0.74)。线性回归显示,在有GCS差值的患者中,更严重的损伤(更高的损伤严重度评分,更差的急诊科处置情况)和年龄较大与负向变化相关,表明评分下降。

结论

GCS在0至3岁的儿科创伤患者中通常不可靠,尤其是言语评分部分。这可能会影响儿科创伤患者分诊优先级的准确性。

证据级别

III级,预后性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验