University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK.
J Pediatr Surg. 2020 Apr;55(4):698-701. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2019.05.010. Epub 2019 May 16.
Evidence based variables predicting the need for surgeon presence (NSP) on arrival of an injured child are limited. We sought to identify prehospital factors that best correlate with NSP and highest level of activation in pediatric trauma. A secondary analysis was also performed to determine whether injury severity score (ISS) was predictive of NSP in pediatric trauma.
This was a retrospective, single institution study of injured patients age ≤ 16 years delivered from scene to our Pediatric Level I trauma center between January 2016 and June 2017. 526 patients had complete data available for analysis. NSP was previously described as the presence of any of these factors: intubation, transfusion, emergent operation with the trauma team/craniotomy with the neurosurgery team, vasopressors, interventional radiology, spinal cord Injury, chest tube, emergency department thoracotomy, intracranial pressure monitor, pericardiocentesis, or death in the trauma bay. Multivariable analysis was performed with covariates of interest including scene and ED arrival vitals and interventions.
Independent predictors of NSP and highest level of activation were GCS of ≤12 (OR 22.3), penetrating trauma (OR 5.4), and hypotension (age adjusted) (OR 10.2). We also found that ISS ≥ 16 was a poor indicator of NSP with a sensitivity of only 61%.
A validated model based on these variables may be useful in predicting NSP and highest level of activation prior to arrival of pediatric trauma patients. NSP may augment assessment of over and undertriage in pediatric trauma patients as compared to the ISS/Cribari system alone. Level of evidence Level III, retrospective cohort study.
目前预测受伤儿童到达时是否需要外科医生在场(NSP)的循证变量有限。我们旨在确定与 NSP 以及儿科创伤中最高级别激活最相关的院前因素。还进行了二次分析,以确定损伤严重程度评分(ISS)是否可预测儿科创伤中的 NSP。
这是一项回顾性的、单机构研究,纳入了 2016 年 1 月至 2017 年 6 月期间从现场送往我们的儿科一级创伤中心的年龄≤16 岁的受伤患者。共有 526 名患者有完整的数据可供分析。NSP 之前被描述为存在以下任何因素:插管、输血、创伤团队紧急手术/神经外科团队开颅术、血管加压药、介入放射学、脊髓损伤、胸腔引流管、急诊开胸术、颅内压监测、心包穿刺术或创伤区死亡。使用感兴趣的协变量(包括现场和 ED 到达的生命体征和干预措施)进行多变量分析。
NSP 和最高激活级别的独立预测因素是 GCS 评分≤12(OR 22.3)、穿透性创伤(OR 5.4)和低血压(年龄校正)(OR 10.2)。我们还发现,ISS≥16 是 NSP 的不良指标,其敏感性仅为 61%。
基于这些变量的验证模型可能有助于在儿科创伤患者到达之前预测 NSP 和最高激活级别。与单独的 ISS/Cribari 系统相比,NSP 可能会增强对儿科创伤患者过度和不足分诊的评估。证据水平 III,回顾性队列研究。