Felder Tisha M, Braun Kathryn L, Wigfall Lisa, Sevoyan Maria, Vyas Shraddha, Khan Samira, Brandt Heather M, Rogers Charles, Tanjasiri Sora, Armstead Cheryl A, Hébert James R
South Carolina Cancer Disparities Community Network, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
College of Nursing, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
J Cancer Educ. 2019 Jun;34(3):446-454. doi: 10.1007/s13187-018-1322-z.
The study aims to explore variation in scholarly productivity outcomes by underrepresented status among a diverse sample of researchers in a community-engaged training program. We identified 141 trainees from a web-based survey of researchers in the National Cancer Institute-funded, Community Networks Program Centers (CNPCs) (2011-2016). We conducted a series of multiple logistic regression models to estimate the effect of National Institutes of Health (NIH)-defined underrepresented status on four, self-reported, scholarly productivity outcomes in the previous 5 years: number of publications (first-authored and total) and funded grants (NIH and any agency). Sixty-five percent (n = 92) indicated NIH underrepresented status. In final adjusted models, non-NIH underrepresented (vs. underrepresented) trainees reported an increased odds of having more than the median number of total publications (> 9) (OR = 3.14, 95% CI 1.21-8.65) and any grant funding (OR = 5.10, 95% CI 1.77-14.65). Reporting ≥ 1 mentors (vs. none) was also positively associated (p < 0.05) with these outcomes. The CNPC underrepresented trainees had similar success in first-authored publications and NIH funding as non-underrepresented trainees, but not total publications and grants. Examining trainees' mentoring experiences over time in relation to scholarly productivity outcomes is needed.
该研究旨在探讨在一个社区参与培训项目的多元化研究人员样本中，未被充分代表的身份对学术产出结果的影响。我们通过对美国国家癌症研究所资助的社区网络项目中心（CNPCs）（2011 - 2016年）的研究人员进行基于网络的调查，确定了141名学员。我们进行了一系列多元逻辑回归模型，以估计美国国立卫生研究院（NIH）定义的未被充分代表的身份对过去5年中四项自我报告的学术产出结果的影响：出版物数量（第一作者和总数）以及获得资助的项目（NIH和任何机构）。65%（n = 92）表示处于NIH未被充分代表的状态。在最终调整模型中，非NIH未被充分代表（相对于未被充分代表）的学员报告称，其总出版物数量超过中位数（> 9）（OR = 3.14，95% CI 1.21 - 8.65）以及获得任何资助的几率增加（OR = 5.10，95% CI 1.77 - 14.65）。报告有≥ 1名导师（相对于没有）也与这些结果呈正相关（p < 0.05）。CNPC中未被充分代表的学员在第一作者出版物和NIH资助方面与未被充分代表的学员取得了相似的成功，但在总出版物数量和资助项目方面并非如此。需要研究学员在一段时间内的指导经历与学术产出结果之间的关系。
