• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

拨款能力自我效能对国家研究指导网络(NRMN)迈向学术研究步骤(NRMN STAR)早期阶段研究人员的影响。

The Impact of Grantsmanship Self-Efficacy on Early Stage Investigators of The National Research Mentoring Network Steps Toward Academic Research (NRMN STAR).

机构信息

Program for Research on Men's Health, Hopkins Center for Health Disparities Solutions, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD.

Hopkins Center for Health Disparities Solutions, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD.

出版信息

Ethn Dis. 2020 Jan 16;30(1):75-82. doi: 10.18865/ed.30.1.75. eCollection 2020 Winter.

DOI:10.18865/ed.30.1.75
PMID:31969786
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6970523/
Abstract

The NRMN STAR program was created to address the persistent underrepresentation in grant submissions and receipt of National Institutes of Health (NIH) awards by racial/ethnic minority groups. In our current study, we assessed program impact on trainees' self-efficacy related to grant writing. The program was conducted with two cohorts: one in June 2014 and one in June 2015. We used a 19-item grant writing self-efficacy scale drawn from the 88-item Clinical Research Assessment Inventory of three domains (conceptualizing, designing, and funding a study) to predict whether self-efficacy influences researchers' grant submissions. Trainees were assessed prior to and following program completion with subsequent assessments at 6 and 12 months beyond participation. The majority of trainees were Black (62%), female (62%), and had obtained a PhD (90%). More than half (52%) were assistant professors and 57% had none or <1 year of research experience beyond postdoctoral training. However, 24% of trainees reported no postdoctoral research training. NRMN STAR trainees' self-efficacy significantly improved on all three domains exhibiting a 2.0-point mean change score on two domains (conceptualizing and design) and 3.7 point mean change score on the domain, funding a study. Findings suggest that NRMN's STAR provides impactful, confidence-building training for diverse, early stage investigators with little-to-no skills, experiences, or low self-efficacy in writing research grants.

摘要

NRMN STAR 计划旨在解决少数族裔群体在 NIH 资助申请中持续代表性不足的问题。在我们目前的研究中,我们评估了该计划对受训者撰写资助申请的自我效能感的影响。该计划分两个队列进行:一个是在 2014 年 6 月,另一个是在 2015 年 6 月。我们使用了一个由三个领域(概念化、设计和资助研究)的 88 项临床研究评估清单中的 19 项资助写作自我效能感量表,来预测自我效能感是否会影响研究人员的资助申请。在项目完成前后对受训者进行评估,并在参与后的 6 个月和 12 个月进行后续评估。大多数受训者是黑人(62%),女性(62%),拥有博士学位(90%)。超过一半(52%)是助理教授,57%的人在博士后培训之外没有或<1 年的研究经验。然而,24%的受训者报告没有博士后研究培训。NRMN STAR 受训者在所有三个领域的自我效能感都显著提高,其中两个领域(概念化和设计)的平均变化分数为 2.0 分,资助研究领域的平均变化分数为 3.7 分。研究结果表明,NRMN 的 STAR 为不同背景的早期阶段调查员提供了有影响力的、建立信心的培训,这些调查员在撰写研究资助申请方面几乎没有技能、经验或自我效能感。

相似文献

1
The Impact of Grantsmanship Self-Efficacy on Early Stage Investigators of The National Research Mentoring Network Steps Toward Academic Research (NRMN STAR).拨款能力自我效能对国家研究指导网络(NRMN)迈向学术研究步骤(NRMN STAR)早期阶段研究人员的影响。
Ethn Dis. 2020 Jan 16;30(1):75-82. doi: 10.18865/ed.30.1.75. eCollection 2020 Winter.
2
The Association Between NRMN STAR Grantsmanship Self-Efficacy and Grant Submission.NRMN STAR grantsmanship 自我效能与资助申请之间的关联。
Ethn Dis. 2021 Oct 21;31(4):559-566. doi: 10.18865/ed.31.4.559. eCollection 2021 Fall.
3
Early career biomedical grantsmanship self-efficacy: validation of an abbreviated self-assessment tool.早期职业生物医学资助申请自我效能感:简式自我评估工具的验证。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2019 Jun;1445(1):17-26. doi: 10.1111/nyas.13995. Epub 2018 Dec 5.
4
A new approach to mentoring for research careers: the National Research Mentoring Network.一种针对研究职业指导的新方法:国家研究指导网络。
BMC Proc. 2017 Dec 4;11(Suppl 12):22. doi: 10.1186/s12919-017-0083-8. eCollection 2017.
5
Grant application outcomes for biomedical researchers who participated in the National Research Mentoring Network's Grant Writing Coaching Programs.参与国家研究指导网络资助写作指导项目的生物医学研究人员的资助申请结果。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 9;15(11):e0241851. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241851. eCollection 2020.
6
Mentoring Experiences and Publication Productivity among Early Career Biomedical Investigators and Trainees.论早期生物医学研究人员和受训者的指导经验与发表成果。
Ethn Dis. 2021 Apr 15;31(2):273-282. doi: 10.18865/ed.31.2.273. eCollection 2021 Spring.
7
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Workshop Summary: Enhancing Opportunities for Training and Retention of a Diverse Biomedical Workforce.美国国立心肺血液研究所研讨会总结:增加培训机会并留住多元化生物医学人才队伍。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016 Apr;13(4):562-7. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201509-624OT.
8
Exploring Professional Development for New Investigators Underrepresented in the Federally Funded Biomedical Research Workforce.探索在联邦资助的生物医学研究劳动力中代表性不足的新研究人员的专业发展。
Ethn Dis. 2019 Feb 21;29(Suppl 1):123-128. doi: 10.18865/ed.29.S1.123. eCollection 2019.
9
Variations of a group coaching intervention to support early-career biomedical researchers in Grant proposal development: a pragmatic, four-arm, group-randomized trial.一种群组辅导干预措施的变化,旨在支持早期职业生物医学研究人员进行资助提案的开发:一项实用的、四臂、群组随机试验。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Jan 10;22(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-03093-w.
10
Mentoring, Training, and Scholarly Productivity Experiences of Cancer-Related Health Disparities Research Trainees: Do Outcomes Differ for Underrepresented Scientists?癌症相关健康差异研究学员的指导、培训及学术产出经历:未被充分代表的科学家的成果是否有所不同?
J Cancer Educ. 2019 Jun;34(3):446-454. doi: 10.1007/s13187-018-1322-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Examining the effect of a non-attendance fee on writing workshop attendance, grant submission, and success rates among K award applicants.考察缺席费对写作工作坊出席率、资助申请以及K奖申请者成功率的影响。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2025 Jun 13;9(1):e145. doi: 10.1017/cts.2025.10079. eCollection 2025.
2
An exploratory mixed-methods sentiment analysis of a social-emotional learning (SEL)-informed grant writing workshop in the biosciences.对生物科学领域一个受社会情感学习(SEL)启发的资助申请书撰写工作坊进行的探索性混合方法情感分析。
J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2025 Aug 21;26(2):e0021924. doi: 10.1128/jmbe.00219-24. Epub 2025 Jun 4.
3
Addressing structural mentoring barriers in postdoctoral training: a qualitative study.解决博士后培训中的结构性指导障碍:一项定性研究。
Stud Grad Postdr Educ. 2025 Jan 2;16(1). doi: 10.1108/sgpe-04-2023-0033. Epub 2023 Nov 28.
4
Increasing Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in the Health and Health Services Research Workforce: A Systematic Scoping Review.增加卫生与卫生服务研究人员队伍的多样性、公平性和包容性:一项系统性综述。
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 May;40(7):1487-1497. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-09041-w. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
5
Mentorship Interventions in Postgraduate Medical and STEM Settings: A Scoping Review.研究生医学和 STEM 领域的指导干预措施:范围综述。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2024 Sep;23(3):ar33. doi: 10.1187/cbe.23-08-0155.
6
Individual and Institutional Factors Contribute to Research Capacity Building for Early-Stage Investigators from Groups Underrepresented in Biomedical Research: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis.个体和机构因素有助于为生物医学研究代表性不足的群体中的早期研究者建立研究能力:定性比较分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Apr 27;20(9):5662. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20095662.
7
The Association Between NRMN STAR Grantsmanship Self-Efficacy and Grant Submission.NRMN STAR grantsmanship 自我效能与资助申请之间的关联。
Ethn Dis. 2021 Oct 21;31(4):559-566. doi: 10.18865/ed.31.4.559. eCollection 2021 Fall.
8
Strengthened through Diversity: A Blueprint for Organizational Change.因多元而强化:组织变革蓝图
Ann Neurol. 2021 Oct;90(4):524-536. doi: 10.1002/ana.26165. Epub 2021 Aug 5.
9
Taking ownership of your career: professional development through experiential learning.掌控你的职业生涯:通过体验式学习实现职业发展。
BMC Proc. 2021 Jun 22;15(Suppl 2):5. doi: 10.1186/s12919-021-00211-w.
10
Mentoring New and Early-Stage Investigators and Underrepresented Minority Faculty for Research Success in Health-Related Fields: An Integrative Literature Review (2010-2020).指导新的和处于早期阶段的研究人员和代表性不足的少数族裔教师进行与健康相关领域的研究成功:综合文献回顾(2010-2020 年)。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 7;18(2):432. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18020432.

本文引用的文献

1
Early career biomedical grantsmanship self-efficacy: validation of an abbreviated self-assessment tool.早期职业生物医学资助申请自我效能感:简式自我评估工具的验证。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2019 Jun;1445(1):17-26. doi: 10.1111/nyas.13995. Epub 2018 Dec 5.
2
Publications as predictors of racial and ethnic differences in NIH research awards.出版物作为 NIH 研究奖项中种族和民族差异的预测指标。
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 14;13(11):e0205929. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205929. eCollection 2018.
3
Implementation of The Steps Toward Academic Research (STAR) Fellowship Program to Promote Underrepresented Minority Faculty into Health Disparity Research.实施学术研究之路(STAR)研究员计划,以促进少数族裔教职员工参与健康差异研究。
Ethn Dis. 2018 Feb 1;28(1):3-10. doi: 10.18865/ed.28.1.3. eCollection 2018 Winter.
4
A new approach to mentoring for research careers: the National Research Mentoring Network.一种针对研究职业指导的新方法:国家研究指导网络。
BMC Proc. 2017 Dec 4;11(Suppl 12):22. doi: 10.1186/s12919-017-0083-8. eCollection 2017.
5
Enhancing research careers: an example of a US national diversity-focused, grant-writing training and coaching experiment.提升研究职业生涯:以美国一项聚焦多样性的国家资助申请书撰写培训与指导实验为例。
BMC Proc. 2017 Dec 4;11(Suppl 12):16. doi: 10.1186/s12919-017-0084-7. eCollection 2017.
6
A Model for Postdoctoral Education That Promotes Minority and Majority Success in the Biomedical Sciences.促进少数族裔和多数族裔在生物医学科学中取得成功的博士后教育模式。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2017 Winter;16(4). doi: 10.1187/cbe.17-03-0051.
7
50 Years to Gender Parity: Can STEM Afford to Wait?: A Cardiologist and NIH Chief Officer of Scientific Workforce Diversity Reflects on What It Will Take to Keep Women in Biomedicine.实现性别平等需50年:STEM领域等得起吗?:一位心脏病专家兼美国国立卫生研究院科学劳动力多样性首席官员反思留住女性从事生物医学工作所需的条件。
IEEE Pulse. 2017 Nov-Dec;8(6):46-48. doi: 10.1109/MPUL.2017.2750839.
8
The promise of a better group future: Cognitive alternatives increase students' self-efficacy and academic performance.更好的集体未来的承诺:认知替代物提高了学生的自我效能感和学业表现。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2017 Dec;56(4):750-765. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12201. Epub 2017 May 25.
9
Towards Equity in Health: Researchers Take Stock.迈向健康公平:研究人员进行评估。
PLoS Med. 2016 Nov 29;13(11):e1002186. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002186. eCollection 2016 Nov.
10
From the NIH: A Systems Approach to Increasing the Diversity of the Biomedical Research Workforce.来自美国国立卫生研究院:增加生物医学研究人员多样性的系统方法。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2016 Fall;15(3). doi: 10.1187/cbe.16-03-0138.