• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

HPV 检测与 HPV 细胞学联合检测在锥切术后预测结局的比较。

HPV-testing versus HPV-cytology co-testing to predict the outcome after conization.

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Southern Jutland Hospital, Sønderborg, Denmark.

出版信息

Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018 Jun;97(6):758-765. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13325. Epub 2018 Mar 5.

DOI:10.1111/aogs.13325
PMID:29430635
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility of human Papillomavirus (HPV) testing alone as a prognostic tool to predict recurrent disease within a three-year follow-up period after treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN)2 .

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospectively, 128 women with histologically verified CIN2 who had a conization performed at Southern Jutland Hospital in Denmark between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2013 were included. Histology, cytology and HPV test results were obtained for a three-year follow-up period.

RESULTS

4.7% (6/128) of the cases developed recurrent disease during follow-up. Of the cases without free margins, recurrent dysplasia was detected normal in 10.4% (5/48), whereas in the group with free margins it was 1.3% (1/80). The post-conization HPV test was negative in 67.2% (86/128) and Pap smear normal in 93.7% (120/128). Combining resection margins, cytology and HPV had sensitivity for prediction of recurrent dysplasia of 100%. Specificity was 45.8%, positive predictive value (PPV) 8.5% and negative predictive value (NPV) 100%. Using HPV test alone as a predictor of recurrent dysplasia gave a sensitivity of 83.3%, specificity 69.7%, PPV 11.9% and NPV 98.8%. Combining resection margin and HPV test had a sensitivity of 100%, specificity 45.9%, PPV 8.3% and NPV 100%.

CONCLUSION

HPV test at six months control post-conization gave an NPV of 98.8% and can be used as a solitary test to identify women at risk for recurrent disease three years after treatment for precursor lesions. Using both resection margin and HPV test had a sensitivity of 100% and NPV 100%. Adding cytology did not increase the predictive value.

摘要

简介

本研究旨在确定人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)检测单独作为一种预后工具的可行性,以预测宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN)2 治疗后三年内复发疾病。

材料和方法

回顾性纳入 2013 年 1 月 1 日至 2013 年 12 月 31 日期间在丹麦南日德兰医院接受宫颈锥切术的 128 例经组织学证实为 CIN2 的女性患者。对其进行了为期三年的随访,以获得组织学、细胞学和 HPV 检测结果。

结果

随访期间,4.7%(6/128)的病例发生了复发疾病。在无游离边缘的病例中,10.4%(5/48)检测到复发的不典型增生,而在有游离边缘的病例中,该比例为 1.3%(1/80)。128 例患者中,67.2%(86/128)的患者在锥切术后 HPV 检测呈阴性,93.7%(120/128)的患者巴氏涂片正常。结合切缘、细胞学和 HPV 检查,对复发不典型增生的预测敏感性为 100%。特异性为 45.8%,阳性预测值(PPV)为 8.5%,阴性预测值(NPV)为 100%。单纯使用 HPV 检测作为复发不典型增生的预测因子,其敏感性为 83.3%,特异性为 69.7%,PPV 为 11.9%,NPV 为 98.8%。结合切缘和 HPV 检测的敏感性为 100%,特异性为 45.9%,PPV 为 8.3%,NPV 为 100%。

结论

锥切术后 6 个月的 HPV 检测的 NPV 为 98.8%,可作为一种单独的检测方法,用于识别治疗前病变后三年内复发疾病的高危女性。同时使用切缘和 HPV 检测的敏感性为 100%,NPV 为 100%。增加细胞学检查并未增加预测值。

相似文献

1
HPV-testing versus HPV-cytology co-testing to predict the outcome after conization.HPV 检测与 HPV 细胞学联合检测在锥切术后预测结局的比较。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018 Jun;97(6):758-765. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13325. Epub 2018 Mar 5.
2
The significance of HPV in the follow-up period after treatment for CIN.人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)在CIN治疗后随访期的意义。
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2010;31(1):27-30.
3
Role of human papillomavirus testing and cytology in follow-up after conization.人乳头瘤病毒检测和细胞学检查在锥切术后随访中的作用。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015 Apr;94(4):405-11. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12601. Epub 2015 Feb 27.
4
Prediction of recurrence after treatment for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: the role of human papillomavirus testing and age at conisation.高级别宫颈上皮内瘤变治疗后复发的预测:人乳头瘤病毒检测及锥切时年龄的作用
BJOG. 2006 Nov;113(11):1303-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01063.x. Epub 2006 Sep 15.
5
HPV Test as Test of Cure After Conization for CIN2+: A Nationwide Register-Based Cohort Study.HPV 检测作为 CIN2+锥切后治愈的检测方法:一项全国范围内基于登记的队列研究。
J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2022 Oct 1;26(4):287-292. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000693.
6
Pap Smear Combined with HPV Testing: A Reasonable Tool for Women with High-grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Treated by LEEP.巴氏涂片联合人乳头瘤病毒检测:用于经利普刀治疗的高级别宫颈上皮内瘤变女性的合理工具。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16(10):4297-302. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2015.16.10.4297.
7
Pre- and post-conization high-risk HPV testing predicts residual/recurrent disease in patients treated for CIN 2-3.宫颈锥切术前和术后的高危型人乳头瘤病毒检测可预测CIN 2-3患者的残留/复发性疾病。
Gynecol Oncol. 2006 Nov;103(2):631-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.04.016. Epub 2006 Jun 14.
8
PCR detection rates of high risk human papillomavirus DNA in paired self-collected urine and cervical scrapes after laser CO2 conization for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.二氧化碳激光锥切治疗高级别宫颈上皮内瘤变后,配对的自行采集尿液和宫颈刮片中高危型人乳头瘤病毒DNA的PCR检测率
Gynecol Oncol. 2008 Apr;109(1):59-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.12.032. Epub 2008 Feb 5.
9
Prediction of recurrent disease by cytology and HPV testing after treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.宫颈上皮内瘤变治疗后通过细胞学和人乳头瘤病毒检测预测疾病复发
Cytopathology. 2009 Feb;20(1):27-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2303.2008.00567.x. Epub 2008 May 28.
10
Type-specific HPV geno-typing improves detection of recurrent high-grade cervical neoplasia after conisation.针对 HPV 型别进行基因分型可提高锥切术后复发高级别宫颈上皮内瘤样病变的检出率。
Int J Cancer. 2011 Aug 15;129(4):903-9. doi: 10.1002/ijc.25745. Epub 2011 Feb 11.

引用本文的文献

1
The value of endocervical curettage during large loop excision of the transformation zone in combination with endocervical surgical margin in predicting persistent/recurrent dysplasia of the uterine cervix: a retrospective study.宫颈管搔刮术在大环形电切术治疗转化区联合宫颈管外科切缘在预测子宫颈持续性/复发性发育不良中的价值:一项回顾性研究。
BMC Womens Health. 2024 Aug 21;24(1):461. doi: 10.1186/s12905-024-03291-w.
2
Efficiency of CIN2+ Detection by Thyrotropin-Releasing Hormone (TRH) Site-Specific Methylation.促甲状腺激素释放激素(TRH)位点特异性甲基化检测CIN2+的效率
Viruses. 2023 Aug 24;15(9):1802. doi: 10.3390/v15091802.
3
Predictors of treatment failure for adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix: Up to 14 years of recorded follow-up.
子宫颈腺癌治疗失败的预测因素:长达14年的随访记录
Oncol Lett. 2022 Aug 25;24(4):357. doi: 10.3892/ol.2022.13477. eCollection 2022 Oct.
4
Precancerous cervical lesions caused by non-vaccine-preventable HPV types after vaccination with the bivalent AS04-adjuvanted HPV vaccine: an analysis of the long-term follow-up study from the randomised Costa Rica HPV Vaccine Trial.二价 AS04 佐剂 HPV 疫苗接种后由非疫苗可预防 HPV 型引起的癌前宫颈病变:来自随机化的哥斯达黎加 HPV 疫苗试验的长期随访研究分析。
Lancet Oncol. 2022 Jul;23(7):940-949. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00291-1. Epub 2022 Jun 13.
5
Age, margin status, high-risk human papillomavirus and cytology independently predict recurrent high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia up to 6 years after treatment.年龄、切缘状态、高危型人乳头瘤病毒和细胞学检查可独立预测治疗后长达6年的复发性高级别宫颈上皮内瘤变。
Oncol Lett. 2021 Sep;22(3):684. doi: 10.3892/ol.2021.12945. Epub 2021 Jul 27.
6
Association Between Positive Human Papillomavirus Status After Conization and Disease Recurrence in Patients with Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 3.宫颈上皮内瘤变3级患者锥切术后人乳头瘤病毒阳性状态与疾病复发的关系
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2021 Feb;71(1):66-71. doi: 10.1007/s13224-020-01368-8. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
7
Self-sampling for high-risk human papillomavirus as a follow-up alternative after treatment of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.高危型人乳头瘤病毒自我采样作为高级别宫颈上皮内瘤变治疗后的随访替代方法。
Oncol Lett. 2021 Apr;21(4):240. doi: 10.3892/ol.2021.12501. Epub 2021 Jan 31.
8
Role of Colposcopy after Treatment for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia.宫颈上皮内瘤变治疗后的阴道镜检查作用
Cancers (Basel). 2020 Jun 24;12(6):1683. doi: 10.3390/cancers12061683.
9
Reporting and Assessing the Quality of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies for Cervical Cancer Screening and Management.报告和评估宫颈癌筛查和管理的诊断准确性研究的质量。
J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2020 Apr;24(2):157-166. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000527.
10
A Systematic Review of Tests for Postcolposcopy and Posttreatment Surveillance.阴道镜检查后和治疗后监测的检测方法的系统评价
J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2020 Apr;24(2):148-156. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000526.