• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高危型人乳头瘤病毒自我采样作为高级别宫颈上皮内瘤变治疗后的随访替代方法。

Self-sampling for high-risk human papillomavirus as a follow-up alternative after treatment of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

作者信息

Östensson Ellinor, Belkić Karen, Ramqvist Torbjörn, Mints Miriam, Andersson Sonia

机构信息

Department of Women's and Children's Health, Obstetrics-Gynecology Division, Karolinska Institute, SE-17176 Stockholm, Sweden.

Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institute, SE-17176 Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Oncol Lett. 2021 Apr;21(4):240. doi: 10.3892/ol.2021.12501. Epub 2021 Jan 31.

DOI:10.3892/ol.2021.12501
PMID:33664804
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7884875/
Abstract

Women treated for high-grade cervical-intraepithelial-neoplasia (CIN) require long-term follow-up with high-risk human-papillomavirus (HPV) testing. Self-sampling for HPV is well-accepted among these patients, but its role in follow-up for this group requires investigation. The present study examined how well HPV findings from self-sampled vaginal (VSS) and urine specimens correctly identified women from this cohort with recurrent CIN2+ compared with samples collected by clinicians. At 1st post-conization follow-up, 531 patients (99.8% participation) gave urine samples, performed VSS, underwent colposcopy with punch biopsy of visible lesions and clinician-collected cervical sampling for HPV analysis and liquid-based cytology. A total of 113 patients with positive HPV and/or abnormal cytology at 1st follow-up underwent 2nd follow-up. At 1st follow-up, all patients with recurrent CIN3 had positive HPV results by all methods. Clinician sampling and VSS revealed HPV16 positivity in 50% of recurrent cases and urine sampling revealed HPV16 positivity in 25% of recurrent cases. At 2nd follow-up, all 7 newly-detected CIN2/3 recurrences were associated with HPV positivity on VSS and clinician-samples. Only clinician-collected samples detected HPV positivity for two adenocarcinoma-in-situ recurrences, and both were HPV18 positive. A total of 77 patients had abnormal cytology at 1st follow-up, for which HPV positivity via VSS yielded highest sensitivity. The HPV findings were positive from VSS in 12 patients with high-grade squamous-intraepithelial-lesions (HSIL), and 11 patients with HSIL had positive HPV findings in clinician-collected and urine samples. All methods for assessing HPV presence yielded significant age-adjusted odds ratios for predicting abnormal lesions at 1st follow-up. For overall HPV results, Cohen's kappa revealed substantial agreement between VSS and clinician sampling, and moderate agreement between urine and clinician sampling. Clinician sampling and VSS were highly concordant for HPV16. Insofar as the pathology was squamous (not glandular), VSS appeared as sensitive as clinician sampling for HPV in predicting outcome among the present cohort. Since VSS can be performed at home, this option can maximize participation in the required long-term follow-up for these women at high-risk.

摘要

接受高级别宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN)治疗的女性需要通过高危型人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)检测进行长期随访。HPV自我采样在这些患者中很容易被接受,但其在该组患者随访中的作用仍需研究。本研究探讨了与临床医生采集的样本相比,自我采集的阴道样本(VSS)和尿液样本中的HPV检测结果对该队列中复发性CIN2+女性的识别准确性。在锥切术后首次随访时,531例患者(参与率99.8%)提供了尿液样本、进行了VSS,接受了阴道镜检查并对可见病变进行了活检,同时临床医生采集了宫颈样本用于HPV分析和液基细胞学检查。共有113例在首次随访时HPV阳性和/或细胞学异常的患者接受了第二次随访。在首次随访时,所有复发性CIN3患者的所有检测方法HPV结果均为阳性。临床医生采样和VSS显示,50%的复发病例HPV16阳性,尿液采样显示25%的复发病例HPV16阳性。在第二次随访时,所有7例新检测到的CIN2/3复发均与VSS和临床医生样本中的HPV阳性相关。只有临床医生采集的样本检测到2例原位腺癌复发的HPV阳性,且均为HPV18阳性。共有77例患者在首次随访时细胞学异常,其中通过VSS检测HPV阳性的敏感性最高。12例高级别鳞状上皮内病变(HSIL)患者的VSS检测HPV结果为阳性,11例HSIL患者的临床医生采集样本和尿液样本检测HPV结果为阳性。所有评估HPV存在的方法在预测首次随访时的异常病变方面均产生了显著的年龄调整优势比。对于总体HPV结果,Cohen's kappa显示VSS与临床医生采样之间有高度一致性,尿液与临床医生采样之间有中度一致性。临床医生采样和VSS在HPV16方面高度一致。就病理类型为鳞状(而非腺性)而言,在预测本队列患者的预后方面,VSS在检测HPV方面与临床医生采样一样敏感。由于VSS可以在家中进行,这种方式可以最大限度地提高这些高危女性参与所需长期随访的比例。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d696/7884875/6a69474781d9/ol-21-04-12501-g00.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d696/7884875/6a69474781d9/ol-21-04-12501-g00.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d696/7884875/6a69474781d9/ol-21-04-12501-g00.jpg

相似文献

1
Self-sampling for high-risk human papillomavirus as a follow-up alternative after treatment of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.高危型人乳头瘤病毒自我采样作为高级别宫颈上皮内瘤变治疗后的随访替代方法。
Oncol Lett. 2021 Apr;21(4):240. doi: 10.3892/ol.2021.12501. Epub 2021 Jan 31.
2
The effectiveness of HPV16 and HPV18 genotyping and cytology with different thresholds for the triage of human papillomavirus-based screening on self-collected samples.HPV16 和 HPV18 基因分型以及细胞学检测在基于 HPV 筛查的自我采样样本分流中不同阈值的效果比较。
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 11;15(6):e0234518. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234518. eCollection 2020.
3
Age, margin status, high-risk human papillomavirus and cytology independently predict recurrent high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia up to 6 years after treatment.年龄、切缘状态、高危型人乳头瘤病毒和细胞学检查可独立预测治疗后长达6年的复发性高级别宫颈上皮内瘤变。
Oncol Lett. 2021 Sep;22(3):684. doi: 10.3892/ol.2021.12945. Epub 2021 Jul 27.
4
5
HPV genotyping for triage of women with abnormal cervical cancer screening results: a multicenter prospective study.人乳头瘤病毒基因分型用于宫颈癌筛查结果异常女性的分流:一项多中心前瞻性研究。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2015 Oct;20(5):974-81. doi: 10.1007/s10147-015-0789-4. Epub 2015 Feb 5.
6
Factors affecting residual/recurrent cervical intraepithelial neoplasia after cervical conization with negative margins.影响宫颈锥切术后阴性切缘的宫颈上皮内瘤变残留/复发的因素。
J Med Virol. 2018 Sep;90(9):1541-1548. doi: 10.1002/jmv.25208. Epub 2018 May 25.
7
Evidence regarding human papillomavirus testing in secondary prevention of cervical cancer.有关人乳头瘤病毒检测在宫颈癌二级预防中的证据。
Vaccine. 2012 Nov 20;30 Suppl 5:F88-99. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.06.095.
8
Direct comparison of two vaginal self-sampling devices for the detection of human papillomavirus infections.两种用于检测人乳头瘤病毒感染的阴道自我采样装置的直接比较。
J Clin Virol. 2016 Sep;82:46-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2016.06.016. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
9
Self-collection of vaginal specimens for human papillomavirus testing in cervical cancer prevention (MARCH): a community-based randomised controlled trial.用于宫颈癌预防的人乳头瘤病毒检测的阴道标本自我采集(MARCH):一项基于社区的随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2011 Nov 26;378(9806):1868-73. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61522-5. Epub 2011 Nov 1.
10
Evaluation of a multiplex real time PCR assay for the detection of human papillomavirus infections on self-collected cervicovaginal lavage samples.评估基于多重实时 PCR 检测的自我采集宫颈阴道灌洗液样本中人乳头瘤病毒感染的方法。
J Virol Methods. 2013 Oct;193(1):131-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2013.05.009. Epub 2013 May 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictors of treatment failure for adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix: Up to 14 years of recorded follow-up.子宫颈腺癌治疗失败的预测因素:长达14年的随访记录
Oncol Lett. 2022 Aug 25;24(4):357. doi: 10.3892/ol.2022.13477. eCollection 2022 Oct.
2
Age, margin status, high-risk human papillomavirus and cytology independently predict recurrent high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia up to 6 years after treatment.年龄、切缘状态、高危型人乳头瘤病毒和细胞学检查可独立预测治疗后长达6年的复发性高级别宫颈上皮内瘤变。
Oncol Lett. 2021 Sep;22(3):684. doi: 10.3892/ol.2021.12945. Epub 2021 Jul 27.
3
Urine HPV in the Context of Genital and Cervical Cancer Screening-An Update of Current Literature.

本文引用的文献

1
Analytical performance of HPV assays on vaginal self-collected vs practitioner-collected cervical samples: the SCoPE study.HPV 检测方法在阴道自采样本和医生采集的宫颈样本中的分析性能:SCoPE 研究。
J Clin Virol. 2020 Jun;127:104375. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104375. Epub 2020 Apr 18.
2
Test Accuracy of Human Papillomavirus in Urine for Detection of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia.尿液人乳头瘤病毒检测用于宫颈上皮内瘤变的准确性研究。
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Feb 24;58(3). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01443-19.
3
Acceptance of Self-Sampling Among Long-Term Cervical Screening Non-Attenders with HPV-Positive Results: Promising Opportunity for Specific Cancer Education.
在生殖器和宫颈癌筛查背景下的尿液人乳头瘤病毒——当前文献综述
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Apr 1;13(7):1640. doi: 10.3390/cancers13071640.
HPV 阳性结果的长期宫颈筛查不参与者对自我采样的接受度:特定癌症教育的有前景机会。
J Cancer Educ. 2021 Feb;36(1):126-133. doi: 10.1007/s13187-019-01608-0.
4
Impact of the human papillomavirus status on the development of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in women negative for intraepithelial lesions or malignancy at the baseline: A 9-year Swedish nested case-control follow-up study.人乳头瘤病毒状态对基线时无上皮内病变或恶性肿瘤的女性中高级别宫颈上皮内瘤变发展的影响:一项为期 9 年的瑞典巢式病例对照随访研究。
Cancer. 2019 Jan 15;125(2):239-248. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31788. Epub 2018 Dec 10.
5
Human papillomavirus detection in urine: Effect of a first-void urine collection device and timing of collection.尿液中人乳头瘤病毒的检测:首次排空尿收集装置的效果和采集时间的影响。
J Virol Methods. 2019 Feb;264:23-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2018.11.008. Epub 2018 Nov 16.
6
Is self-sampling to test for high-risk papillomavirus an acceptable option among women who have been treated for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia?对于已经接受过高级别宫颈上皮内瘤变治疗的女性,自我取样检测高危型人乳头瘤病毒是否是一种可以接受的选择?
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 18;13(6):e0199038. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199038. eCollection 2018.
7
Comparison between professional sampling and self-sampling for HPV-based cervical cancer screening among postmenopausal women.绝经后妇女基于 HPV 的宫颈癌筛查中专业采样与自我采样的比较。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018 Sep;142(3):359-364. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12538. Epub 2018 Jun 25.
8
HPV-testing versus HPV-cytology co-testing to predict the outcome after conization.HPV 检测与 HPV 细胞学联合检测在锥切术后预测结局的比较。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018 Jun;97(6):758-765. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13325. Epub 2018 Mar 5.
9
Perceived cervical cancer risk among women treated for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: The importance of specific knowledge.接受高级别宫颈上皮内瘤变治疗的女性对宫颈癌风险的认知:特定知识的重要性。
PLoS One. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):e0190156. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190156. eCollection 2017.
10
Risk of high-grade lesions after atypical glandular cells in cervical screening: a population-based cohort study.宫颈筛查中出现非典型腺细胞后高级别病变的风险:一项基于人群的队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Dec 14;7(12):e017070. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017070.