Suppr超能文献

子宫颈腺癌治疗失败的预测因素:长达14年的随访记录

Predictors of treatment failure for adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix: Up to 14 years of recorded follow-up.

作者信息

Belkić Karen, Andersson Sonia, Alder Susanna, Mints Miriam, Megyessi David

机构信息

Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institute, SE-17176 Stockholm, Sweden.

School of Community/Global Health, Claremont Graduate University, Claremont, CA 91711, USA.

出版信息

Oncol Lett. 2022 Aug 25;24(4):357. doi: 10.3892/ol.2022.13477. eCollection 2022 Oct.

Abstract

The incidence of adenocarcinoma- (AIS) of the uterine cervix is rising, with invasive adenocarcinoma becoming increasingly common relative to squamous cell carcinoma. The present study reviewed a cohort of 84 patients first-time treated by conization for histologically-confirmed AIS from January 2001 to January 2017, to identify risk factors associated with recurrent/persistent AIS as well as progression to invasive cervical cancer. Nearly 80% of the patients were age 40 or younger at conization. Endocervical and ectocervical margins were deemed clear in 42 of the patients. All but two patients had ≥1 follow-up, with post-conization high-risk human papilloma virus (HPV) results documented in 52 patients. Altogether, 12 histopathologically-confirmed recurrences (14.3%) were detected; two of these patients had microinvasive or invasive carcinoma. In three other patients cytology showed AIS, but without recorded histopathology. Eight patients underwent hysterectomy for incomplete resection very soon after primary conization; they were not included in bivariate or multivariate analyses. Having ≥1 post-follow-up positive HPV finding yielded the highest sensitivity for histologically-confirmed recurrence: 87.5 [95% confidence interval (CI) 47.4-99.7]. Current or historical smoking status provided highest specificity: 94.4 (95% CI 72.7-99.9) and overall accuracy: 88.0 (95% CI 68.8-97.5) for histologically-confirmed recurrence. With multiple logistic regression (MLR), adjusting for age at conization and abnormal follow-up cytology, positive HPV18 was the strongest predictor of histologically-confirmed recurrence (P<0.005). Having ≥2 positive HPV results also predicted recurrence (P<0.02). Any unclear margin yielded an odds ratio 7.21 (95% CI 1.34-38.7) for histologically-confirmed recurrence adjusting for age, but became non-significant when including abnormal cytology in the MLR model. The strong predictive value of HPV, particularly HPV18 and persistent HPV positivity vis-à-vis detected recurrence indicated that regular HPV testing for patients treated for AIS is imperative. In conclusion, furthering a participatory approach, including attention to smoking with encouragement to attend needed long-term follow-up, can better protect these patients at high risk for cervical cancer.

摘要

子宫颈原位腺癌(AIS)的发病率正在上升,相对于鳞状细胞癌,浸润性腺癌变得越来越常见。本研究回顾了一组从2001年1月至2017年1月首次接受锥切术治疗且经组织学确诊为AIS的84例患者,以确定与复发性/持续性AIS以及进展为浸润性宫颈癌相关的危险因素。近80%的患者在锥切术时年龄为40岁或更小。42例患者的宫颈管和宫颈外切缘被认为切缘阴性。除两名患者外,所有患者均进行了≥1次随访,52例患者记录了锥切术后高危型人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)检测结果。总共检测到12例经组织病理学确诊的复发(14.3%);其中两名患者患有微浸润癌或浸润癌。另外三名患者的细胞学检查显示为AIS,但未记录组织病理学结果。8例患者在初次锥切术后不久因切除不完全而接受了子宫切除术;他们未纳入二元或多变量分析。随访后HPV检测结果≥1次阳性对经组织学确诊的复发具有最高的敏感性:87.5 [95%置信区间(CI)47.4 - 99.7]。当前或既往吸烟状态对经组织学确诊的复发具有最高的特异性:94.4(95% CI 72.7 - 99.9)和总体准确性:88.0(95% CI 68.8 - 97.5)。通过多因素逻辑回归(MLR)分析,校正锥切术时的年龄和随访细胞学异常后,HPV18阳性是经组织学确诊复发的最强预测因素(P<0.005)。HPV检测结果≥2次阳性也可预测复发(P<0.02)。校正年龄后,任何切缘阴性对经组织学确诊的复发的比值比为7.21(95% CI 1.34 - 38.7),但在MLR模型中纳入细胞学异常后变得无统计学意义。HPV,特别是HPV18和持续性HPV阳性对检测到的复发具有很强的预测价值,这表明对接受AIS治疗的患者进行定期HPV检测势在必行。总之,进一步采用参与性方法,包括关注吸烟情况并鼓励患者接受必要的长期随访,可以更好地保护这些宫颈癌高危患者。

相似文献

1
Predictors of treatment failure for adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix: Up to 14 years of recorded follow-up.
Oncol Lett. 2022 Aug 25;24(4):357. doi: 10.3892/ol.2022.13477. eCollection 2022 Oct.
5
[Risk stratified management of cervical adenocarcinoma in situ based on cone margin state].
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Sep 25;56(9):622-629. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20210802-00417.
6
The safety of conization in the management of adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix.
J Gynecol Oncol. 2011 Mar 31;22(1):25-31. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2011.22.1.25.
7
Factors affecting residual/recurrent cervical intraepithelial neoplasia after cervical conization with negative margins.
J Med Virol. 2018 Sep;90(9):1541-1548. doi: 10.1002/jmv.25208. Epub 2018 May 25.
9
Predictors of residual carcinoma or carcinoma-in-situ at hysterectomy following cervical conization with positive margins.
Gynecol Oncol. 2014 Jan;132(1):76-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.11.019. Epub 2013 Nov 19.

本文引用的文献

2
Impact of COVID-19-related care disruptions on cervical cancer screening in the United States.
J Med Screen. 2021 Jun;28(2):213-216. doi: 10.1177/09691413211001097. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
3
Effects of cancer screening restart strategies after COVID-19 disruption.
Br J Cancer. 2021 Apr;124(9):1516-1523. doi: 10.1038/s41416-021-01261-9. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
6
How has COVID-19 impacted cancer screening? Adaptation of services and the future outlook in Australia.
Public Health Res Pract. 2020 Dec 9;30(4):3042026. doi: 10.17061/phrp3042026.
7
The future of cancer screening after COVID-19 may be at home.
Cancer. 2021 Feb 15;127(4):498-503. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33274. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
8
Designing low-cost, accurate cervical screening strategies that take into account COVID-19: a role for self-sampled HPV typing2.
Infect Agent Cancer. 2020 Oct 14;15:61. doi: 10.1186/s13027-020-00325-4. eCollection 2020.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验