• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

CAD/CAM 树脂块与双固化粘结剂的微拉伸粘结强度:不同喷砂处理程序的影响。

Microtensile Bond Strength of CAD/CAM Resin Blocks to Dual-Cure Adhesive Cement: The Effect of Different Sandblasting Procedures.

机构信息

Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Kocaeli, Kocaeli, Turkey.

Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Istanbul, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

J Prosthodont. 2019 Feb;28(2):e485-e490. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12737. Epub 2018 Feb 11.

DOI:10.1111/jopr.12737
PMID:29430807
Abstract

PURPOSE

To investigate the effect of sandblasting powder particles on microtensile bond strength (μTBS) of dual-cure adhesive cement to CAD/CAM blocks.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

CAD/CAM blocks (Cerasmart, VITA, and LAVA) were cut in slabs and divided into groups: group 1, no sandblasting; group 2, sandblasted with 27-μm Al O ; group 3, sandblasted with 30-μm CoJet; group 4, sandblasted with 50-μm Al O . After sandblasting, all specimens were silanized and luted using dual-cure adhesive cement (G-CEM LinkForce). After 24 hours, bonded specimens were cut into 1 ± 0.2 mm sticks, and μTBS values were obtained (N = 30). Additionally, 132 CAD/CAM block sections were prepared for surface roughness testing and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) evaluations. Results were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis One-way ANOVA and Dunn's Post Hoc Test (p < 0.05).

RESULTS

Group 1 exhibited significantly lower μTBS than the other groups (p < 0.05). The highest bond strength values were obtained from group 4 (p > 0.05). For LAVA, μTBS values of specimens that were sandblasted with 50-μm Al O powder were significantly higher than 30-μm-SiO and 27-μm Al O (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The sand particles investigated (27-μm Al O , 30-μm SiO , or 50-μm Al O ) did not significantly affect μTBS results of CAD/CAM blocks for Cerasmart and VITA, although the results changed significantly for LAVA. The ideal bond protocol for CAD/CAM blocks is specific to the material used.

摘要

目的

研究喷砂粉颗粒对 CAD/CAM 块用双固化粘结剂的微拉伸粘结强度(μTBS)的影响。

材料和方法

将 CAD/CAM 块(Cerasmart、VITA 和 LAVA)切割成平板,并分为以下几组:组 1,未喷砂;组 2,用 27-μm Al2O3 喷砂;组 3,用 30-μm CoJet 喷砂;组 4,用 50-μm Al2O3 喷砂。喷砂后,所有标本均用硅烷偶联剂处理并用双固化粘结剂(G-CEM LinkForce)粘结。24 小时后,将粘结好的标本切割成 1±0.2mm 的棒状,测量 μTBS 值(N=30)。此外,还制备了 132 个 CAD/CAM 块试件用于表面粗糙度测试和扫描电子显微镜(SEM)评估。结果采用 Kruskal-Wallis 单向方差分析和 Dunn 事后检验(p<0.05)进行分析。

结果

组 1 的 μTBS 值明显低于其他组(p<0.05)。组 4 的粘结强度值最高(p>0.05)。对于 LAVA,用 50-μm Al2O3 粉末喷砂的试件的 μTBS 值明显高于 30-μm-SiO2 和 27-μm Al2O3(p<0.05)。

结论

研究的喷砂颗粒(27-μm Al2O3、30-μm-SiO2 或 50-μm Al2O3)对 Cerasmart 和 VITA 的 CAD/CAM 块的 μTBS 结果没有显著影响,尽管 LAVA 的结果变化显著。CAD/CAM 块的理想粘结方案取决于所使用的材料。

相似文献

1
Microtensile Bond Strength of CAD/CAM Resin Blocks to Dual-Cure Adhesive Cement: The Effect of Different Sandblasting Procedures.CAD/CAM 树脂块与双固化粘结剂的微拉伸粘结强度:不同喷砂处理程序的影响。
J Prosthodont. 2019 Feb;28(2):e485-e490. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12737. Epub 2018 Feb 11.
2
Bond strength of novel CAD/CAM restorative materials to self-adhesive resin cement: the effect of surface treatments.新型CAD/CAM修复材料与自粘树脂水门汀的粘结强度:表面处理的影响
J Adhes Dent. 2014 Dec;16(6):531-40. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a33198.
3
The effect of sandblasting duration on the bond durability of dual-cure adhesive cement to CAD/CAM resin restoratives.喷砂持续时间对双固化粘结水门汀与CAD/CAM树脂修复体粘结耐久性的影响。
J Adv Prosthodont. 2018 Jun;10(3):211-217. doi: 10.4047/jap.2018.10.3.211. Epub 2018 Jun 12.
4
Bonding Effectiveness of Luting Composites to Different CAD/CAM Materials.粘结性复合材料与不同CAD/CAM材料的粘结效果
J Adhes Dent. 2016;18(4):289-302. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a36155.
5
Effect of surface conditioning with airborne-particle abrasion on the tensile strength of polymeric CAD/CAM crowns luted with self-adhesive and conventional resin cements.喷砂酸蚀处理对 CAD/CAM 全瓷聚合体牙冠黏结强度的影响:自粘接树脂水门汀与传统树脂水门汀的对比
J Prosthet Dent. 2012 Feb;107(2):94-101. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(12)60031-6.
6
Evaluation of the Effect of Different Surface Treatments on Luting CAD/CAM Composite Resin Overlay Workpieces.不同表面处理对粘接CAD/CAM复合树脂覆盖层工件效果的评估。
J Adhes Dent. 2015 Dec;17(6):521-8. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a35256.
7
Microtensile Bond Strength of Composite Cement to Novel CAD/CAM Materials as a Function of Surface Treatment and Aging.复合树脂水门汀与新型CAD/CAM材料的微拉伸粘结强度:表面处理和老化的作用
Oper Dent. 2017 Jan/Feb;42(1):73-81. doi: 10.2341/15-263-L. Epub 2016 Sep 30.
8
Effect of Different Surface Treatments on Bond Strength of Resin Cement to a CAD/CAM Restorative Material.不同表面处理对树脂水门汀与 CAD/CAM 修复材料粘结强度的影响。
J Prosthodont. 2019 Jan;28(1):71-78. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12574. Epub 2016 Nov 23.
9
Microtensile bond strength of CAD/CAM materials to dentin under different adhesive strategies.CAD/CAM 材料在不同粘接策略下与牙本质的微拉伸粘接强度。
Braz Oral Res. 2017 Dec 18;31:e109. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2017.vol31.0109.
10
Microtensile Bond Strength of Self-Adhesive Resin Cements to CAD/CAM Resin-Matrix Ceramics Prepared with Different Surface Treatments.自粘接树脂水门汀与不同表面处理 CAD/CAM 树脂基质陶瓷的微拉伸粘结强度。
Int J Prosthodont. 2019 Sep/Oct;32(32):433-438. doi: 10.11607/ijp.6268.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of Different Luting Methods on the Microtensile Bond Strength of CAD/CAM Resin Blocks.不同粘结方法对CAD/CAM树脂块微拉伸粘结强度的影响
Biomimetics (Basel). 2025 Feb 19;10(2):123. doi: 10.3390/biomimetics10020123.
2
Comparison of the effects of laser systems and cold atmospheric plasma on the surface roughness and shear bond strength of flexible hybrid ceramics.激光系统和冷等离体子体对柔性混合陶瓷表面粗糙度和剪切粘结强度影响的比较。
3
Bonding effectiveness of multi-step adhesive resin cements to CAD/CAM blocks: impact of thermal cycling and surface treatment methods.
多步型树脂水门汀与 CAD/CAM 块粘结效果:热循环与表面处理方法的影响。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Nov 1;24(1):1326. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05091-y.
4
A Comparison of the Shear Bond Strength between a Luting Composite Resin and Both Machinable and Printable Ceramic-Glass Polymer Materials.一种粘结性复合树脂与可加工及可打印陶瓷玻璃聚合物材料之间的剪切粘结强度比较。
Materials (Basel). 2024 Sep 25;17(19):4697. doi: 10.3390/ma17194697.
5
Evaluation of shear bond strength of labial veneers after sandblasting/micro-abrasion of prepared teeth by aluminum oxide particles. An in-vitro study.通过氧化铝颗粒对预备牙进行喷砂/微磨损后,评估唇面贴面的剪切粘结强度。一项体外研究。
Saudi Dent J. 2024 Jun;36(6):905-914. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2024.04.003. Epub 2024 Apr 18.
6
Microtensile Bond Strength of CAD-CAM Restorative Dental Material Blocks to Resin Cement: An In Vitro Study.计算机辅助设计与制造(CAD-CAM)牙科修复材料块与树脂水门汀的微拉伸粘结强度:一项体外研究
Materials (Basel). 2023 Jul 3;16(13):4796. doi: 10.3390/ma16134796.
7
Bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements to a high transparency zirconia crown and dentin.自粘结树脂水门汀与高透明度氧化锆全冠及牙本质的粘结强度
J Dent Sci. 2022 Apr;17(2):973-983. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2021.12.008. Epub 2021 Dec 20.
8
Effect of aging on color stability of amine-free resin cement through the ceramic laminate veneer.老化对通过陶瓷贴面的无胺树脂水门汀颜色稳定性的影响。
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2021 Nov 22;18:99. doi: 10.4103/1735-3327.330880. eCollection 2021.
9
The effect of silane and universal adhesives on the micro-shear bond strength of current resin-matrix ceramics.硅烷和通用粘结剂对当前树脂基陶瓷微剪切粘结强度的影响。
J Adv Prosthodont. 2021 Oct;13(5):292-303. doi: 10.4047/jap.2021.13.5.292. Epub 2021 Oct 27.
10
Micro-shear bond strengths of resin-matrix ceramics subjected to different surface conditioning strategies with or without coupling agent application.采用或不采用偶联剂处理的不同表面处理策略下树脂基陶瓷的微剪切粘结强度。
J Adv Prosthodont. 2021 Jun;13(3):180-190. doi: 10.4047/jap.2021.13.3.180. Epub 2021 Jun 25.