Suppr超能文献

联想强度还是要点提取:当DRM列表中有两个关键诱饵时,哪个更重要?

Associative strength or gist extraction: Which matters when DRM lists have two critical lures?

作者信息

Oliveira Helena M, Albuquerque Pedro B, Saraiva Magda

机构信息

1 Escola de Psicologia, Universidade do Minho, Braga, Portugal.

2 Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (ISCTE-IUL), Centro de Investigação e Intervenção Social, Lisboa, Portugal.

出版信息

Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2019 Mar;72(3):570-578. doi: 10.1177/1747021818761002. Epub 2018 Mar 9.

Abstract

The Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) paradigm is often used in the study of false memories. This paradigm typically uses lists of words associated with one critical lure. The primary objective of our study was to understand the production of false memories using the DRM paradigm when lists of words are associated with two critical lures. Three experiments were performed, and it was observed that the critical lures associated with the first set were significantly more frequently recalled than the critical lures associated with the second set. This result was verified when the words were presented in descending order of association with the critical lure (Experiment 1), when the words of the second set were presented in ascending order of association with the critical lure (Experiment 2), and when all the words in the list had the same associative strength (Experiment 3). Results are explained by the activation/monitoring and fuzzy-trace theories.

摘要

迪斯-罗迪格-麦克德莫特(DRM)范式常用于错误记忆的研究。该范式通常使用与一个关键诱饵相关的单词列表。我们研究的主要目的是了解当单词列表与两个关键诱饵相关联时,使用DRM范式产生错误记忆的情况。进行了三项实验,结果发现与第一组相关的关键诱饵比与第二组相关的关键诱饵被回忆起的频率显著更高。当单词按照与关键诱饵的关联程度降序呈现时(实验1)、当第二组单词按照与关键诱饵的关联程度升序呈现时(实验2)以及当列表中的所有单词具有相同的关联强度时(实验3),这一结果都得到了验证。结果由激活/监测理论和模糊痕迹理论进行了解释。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验