Oliveira Helena M, Albuquerque Pedro B, Saraiva Magda
1 Escola de Psicologia, Universidade do Minho, Braga, Portugal.
2 Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (ISCTE-IUL), Centro de Investigação e Intervenção Social, Lisboa, Portugal.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2019 Mar;72(3):570-578. doi: 10.1177/1747021818761002. Epub 2018 Mar 9.
The Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) paradigm is often used in the study of false memories. This paradigm typically uses lists of words associated with one critical lure. The primary objective of our study was to understand the production of false memories using the DRM paradigm when lists of words are associated with two critical lures. Three experiments were performed, and it was observed that the critical lures associated with the first set were significantly more frequently recalled than the critical lures associated with the second set. This result was verified when the words were presented in descending order of association with the critical lure (Experiment 1), when the words of the second set were presented in ascending order of association with the critical lure (Experiment 2), and when all the words in the list had the same associative strength (Experiment 3). Results are explained by the activation/monitoring and fuzzy-trace theories.
迪斯-罗迪格-麦克德莫特（DRM）范式常用于错误记忆的研究。该范式通常使用与一个关键诱饵相关的单词列表。我们研究的主要目的是了解当单词列表与两个关键诱饵相关联时，使用DRM范式产生错误记忆的情况。进行了三项实验，结果发现与第一组相关的关键诱饵比与第二组相关的关键诱饵被回忆起的频率显著更高。当单词按照与关键诱饵的关联程度降序呈现时（实验1）、当第二组单词按照与关键诱饵的关联程度升序呈现时（实验2）以及当列表中的所有单词具有相同的关联强度时（实验3），这一结果都得到了验证。结果由激活/监测理论和模糊痕迹理论进行了解释。
