Department of Bioengineering, University of California-San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive MC 0412, La Jolla, CA 92093-0412, USA.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of California-San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive MC 0863, La Jolla, CA 92093-0863, USA.
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2018 Apr;80:203-208. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.02.004. Epub 2018 Feb 3.
Titanium cages with 3-D printed trussed open-space architectures may provide an opportunity to deliver targeted mechanical behavior in spine interbody fusion devices. The ability to control mechanical strain, at levels known to stimulate an osteogenic response, to the fusion site could lead to development of optimized therapeutic implants that improve clinical outcomes. In this study, cages of varying design (1.00 mm or 0.75 mm diameter struts) were mechanically characterized and compared for multiple compressive load magnitudes in order to determine what impact certain design variables had on localized strain. Each cage was instrumented with small fiducial sphere markers (88 total) at each strut vertex of the truss structure, which comprised of 260 individual struts. Cages were subjected to a 50 N control, 1000 N, or 2000 N compressive load between contoured loading platens in a simulated vertebral fusion condition, during which the cages were imaged using high-resolution micro-CT. The cage was analyzed as a mechanical truss structure, with each strut defined as the connection of two vertex fiducials. The deformation and strain of each strut was determined from 50 N control to 1000 N or 2000 N load by tracking the change in distance between each fiducial marker. As in a truss system, the number of struts in tension (positive strain) and compression (negative strain) were roughly equal, with increased loads resulting in a widened distribution (SD) compared with that at 50 N tare load indicating increased strain magnitudes. Strain distribution increased from 1000 N (+156 ± 415 με) to 2000 N (+180 ± 605 με) in 1.00 mm cages, which was similar to 0.75 mm cages (+132 ± 622 με) at 1000 N load. Strain amplitudes increased 42%, from 346με at 1000 N to 492με at 2000 N, for 1.00 mm cages. At 1000 N, strain amplitude in 0.75 mm cages (481με) was higher by 39% than that in 1.00 mm cages. These amplitudes corresponded to the mechanobiological range of bone homeostasis+formation, with 63 ± 2% (p < .05 vs other groups), 72 ± 3%, and 73 ± 1% of struts within that range for 1.00 mm at 1000 N, 1.00 mm at 2000 N, and 0.75 mm at 1000 N, respectively. The effective compressive modulus for both cage designs was also dependent on strut diameter, with modulus decreasing from 12.1 ± 2.3 GPa (1.25 mm) to 9.2 ± 7.5 GPa (1.00 mm) and 3.8 ± 0.6 GPa (0.75 mm). This study extended past micro-scale mechanical characterization of trussed cages to compare the effects of design on cage mechanical behavior at moderate (1000 N) and strenuous (2000 N) load levels. The findings suggest that future cage designs may be modulated to target desired mechanical strain regimes at physiological loads.
钛笼与 3D 打印桁架开空间结构相结合,可能为脊柱椎间融合装置提供靶向机械性能的机会。控制机械应变的能力(已知刺激成骨反应的水平)可以传递到融合部位,从而开发出优化的治疗性植入物,提高临床效果。在这项研究中,设计了不同的笼子(直径 1.00mm 或 0.75mm 的支柱),并在多个压缩载荷量级下对其进行了机械特性比较,以确定某些设计变量对局部应变的影响。每个笼子都在桁架结构的每个支柱顶点处安装了小基准球标记(共 88 个),桁架结构由 260 个单独的支柱组成。笼子在模拟椎体融合条件下的轮廓加载平板之间承受 50N 的控制、1000N 或 2000N 的压缩载荷,在此期间,使用高分辨率微 CT 对笼子进行成像。将笼子分析为机械桁架结构,每个支柱定义为两个顶点基准点的连接。通过跟踪每个基准标记之间的距离变化,确定从 50N 控制到 1000N 或 2000N 负载时每个支柱的变形和应变。与桁架系统一样,受拉(正应变)和受压(负应变)的支柱数量大致相等,随着负载的增加,分布(SD)变宽,与 50N 空载负载相比,表明应变幅度增加。1.00mm 笼子的应变分布从 1000N(+156±415με)增加到 2000N(+180±605με),而 0.75mm 笼子在 1000N 负载时为+132±622με。应变幅度增加了 42%,从 1000N 时的 346με增加到 2000N 时的 492με,对于 1.00mm 笼子。在 1000N 时,0.75mm 笼子(481με)的应变幅度比 1.00mm 笼子高 39%。这些幅度对应于骨稳态+形成的机械生物学范围,对于 1.00mm 的笼子,1000N 时有 63±2%(p<0.05 与其他组相比)、72±3%和 73±1%的支柱在该范围内,1000N 时为 1.00mm,2000N 时为 1.00mm,1000N 时为 0.75mm。两种笼设计的有效抗压模量也依赖于支柱直径,模量从 12.1±2.3GPa(1.25mm)降至 9.2±7.5GPa(1.00mm)和 3.8±0.6GPa(0.75mm)。本研究将桁架笼的微观力学特性扩展到中等(1000N)和剧烈(2000N)载荷水平,比较设计对笼力学性能的影响。研究结果表明,未来的笼设计可以调节以达到生理负荷下所需的机械应变范围。