Suppr超能文献

丁丙诺啡单用或与纳洛酮联用:哪种更安全?

Buprenorphine alone or with naloxone: Which is safer?

机构信息

1 Division of Psychiatry, University of Western Australia, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, WA, Australia.

2 School of Population and Global Health, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia.

出版信息

J Psychopharmacol. 2018 Mar;32(3):344-352. doi: 10.1177/0269881118756015. Epub 2018 Feb 13.

Abstract

To address concerns regarding the intravenous diversion of buprenorphine, a combined buprenorphine-naloxone (BUP-NLX) preparation was developed. The aim of this study is to compare health outcomes in opioid dependent patients treated with BUP and BUP-NLX. All patients treated with BUP and/or BUP-NLX in Western Australia between 2001 and 2010 were included in the study ( N = 3455). Patients were identified via State prescribing records and matched against the State mortality, hospital, and emergency department records. Rates of health events were examined and compared using Cox Proportional Hazard Models and Generalized Estimating Equations. While on treatment there was no significant difference between mortality rates in the two groups, mortality rates following the cessation of treatment were significantly higher in patients treated with BUP-NLX (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.59). Rates of hospitalization were significantly elevated in BUP-NLX patients (adjusted odds ratio: 1.17) compared with BUP treated patients; however, rates of hospitalization with a skin/subcutaneous diagnosis were significantly lower in BUP-NLX treated patients (adjusted odds ratio: 0.65). Off-treatment rates of both all-cause hospital admissions (adjusted odds ratio: 1.53) and hospital admissions with an opioid poisoning diagnosis (adjusted odds ratio: 1.59) were significantly elevated in BUP-NLX treated patients compared with BUP treated patients. The addition of naloxone does not appear to improve the safety profile of buprenorphine.

摘要

为了解决人们对丁丙诺啡静脉滥用的担忧,开发了一种丁丙诺啡-纳洛酮(BUP-NLX)复方制剂。本研究旨在比较使用 BUP 和 BUP-NLX 治疗的阿片类药物依赖患者的健康结局。研究纳入了 2001 年至 2010 年间在西澳大利亚州接受 BUP 和/或 BUP-NLX 治疗的所有患者(N=3455)。通过州处方记录和州死亡率、住院和急诊记录来识别患者。使用 Cox 比例风险模型和广义估计方程检查和比较健康事件的发生率。在治疗期间,两组的死亡率没有显著差异,但停止治疗后 BUP-NLX 治疗组的死亡率明显更高(调整后的危险比:1.59)。与 BUP 治疗组相比,BUP-NLX 治疗组的住院率显著升高(调整后的优势比:1.17);然而,BUP-NLX 治疗组的皮肤/皮下诊断住院率显著降低(调整后的优势比:0.65)。与 BUP 治疗组相比,BUP-NLX 治疗组停药后的全因住院率(调整后的优势比:1.53)和阿片类药物中毒诊断的住院率(调整后的优势比:1.59)显著升高。纳洛酮的加入似乎并没有改善丁丙诺啡的安全性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验