• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

卵巢癌筛查项目:临床管理中的合理举措?一项荟萃分析。

Screening program in ovarian cancer: A logical step in clinical management? A meta-analysis.

作者信息

Marchetti Claudia, De Felice Francesca, Perniola Giorgia, Lecce Francesca, Vertechy Laura, Monti Marco, Musio Daniela, Muzii Ludovico, Tombolini Vincenzo, Benedetti Panici Pierluigi

机构信息

Department of Gynecological and Obstetrical Sciences and Urological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

Department of Radiotherapy, Policlinico Umberto I "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Curr Probl Cancer. 2018 Mar-Apr;42(2):235-240. doi: 10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2017.12.005. Epub 2018 Jan 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2017.12.005
PMID:29433824
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Treatment of ovarian cancer (OC) is a challenge and its poor prognosis still remains a problem of major importance. Due to the lack of early and specific symptoms, the vast majority of women are diagnosed with an advanced stage disease. The aim of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the impact of OC screening program in asymptomatic women on clinical outcomes.

METHODS AND MATERIAL

A systematic literature electronic search was conducted in Pubmed, Medline, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases. Articles were selected with a systematic approach. Clinical trials concerning screening strategy compared with usual care in asymptomatic OC women were considered, without any restrictions on the publication date. Trials were eligible if participants were asymptomatic and postmenopausal women. Outcomes included OC diagnosis and disease specific mortality. The pooled relative risk (RR) was calculated using a fixed-effects model.

RESULTS

Overall, 3 randomized controlled trials met inclusion criteria, totaling 353,590 asymptomatic women. In total 177,188 women were assigned to screening program, and 176,402 women were assigned to usual care. The risk of OC diagnosis, both overall and at an early stage, was higher in screening group (RR = 1.07, 95% CI: 0.98-1.18; and RR = 1.30, 95% CI: 1.14-1.49, respectively). The RR for disease specific mortality was 0.96 (95% CI: 0.85-1.10).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest the possible benefit of OC screening program in term of early stage diagnosis and reduced specific OC mortality. Further studies of environmental or constitutional factors may lead to the identification of patient populations that could benefit from a screening program.

摘要

目的

卵巢癌(OC)的治疗是一项挑战,其预后较差仍然是一个至关重要的问题。由于缺乏早期和特异性症状,绝大多数女性被诊断为晚期疾病。本荟萃分析的目的是评估无症状女性的OC筛查计划对临床结局的影响。

方法和材料

在PubMed、Medline、Scopus和ClinicalTrials.gov数据库中进行了系统的文献电子检索。采用系统方法选择文章。考虑了关于筛查策略与无症状OC女性常规护理相比的临床试验,对发表日期没有任何限制。如果参与者是无症状的绝经后女性,则试验符合条件。结局包括OC诊断和疾病特异性死亡率。使用固定效应模型计算合并相对风险(RR)。

结果

总体而言,3项随机对照试验符合纳入标准,共有353,590名无症状女性。总共有177,188名女性被分配到筛查计划,176,402名女性被分配到常规护理。筛查组的OC总体诊断风险和早期诊断风险均较高(RR分别为1.07,95%CI:0.98 - 1.18;RR为1.30,95%CI:1.14 - 1.49)。疾病特异性死亡率的RR为0.96(95%CI:0.85 - 1.10)。

结论

我们的结果表明,OC筛查计划在早期诊断和降低OC特异性死亡率方面可能有益。对环境或体质因素的进一步研究可能会确定哪些患者群体可以从筛查计划中获益。

相似文献

1
Screening program in ovarian cancer: A logical step in clinical management? A meta-analysis.卵巢癌筛查项目:临床管理中的合理举措?一项荟萃分析。
Curr Probl Cancer. 2018 Mar-Apr;42(2):235-240. doi: 10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2017.12.005. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
2
Evidence of Stage Shift in Women Diagnosed With Ovarian Cancer During Phase II of the United Kingdom Familial Ovarian Cancer Screening Study.在英国家族性卵巢癌筛查研究的第二阶段中,被诊断为卵巢癌的女性出现分期转移的证据。
J Clin Oncol. 2017 May 1;35(13):1411-1420. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.69.9330. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
3
Risks and benefits of screening asymptomatic women for ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.筛查无症状女性卵巢癌的风险和获益:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Gynecol Oncol. 2013 Sep;130(3):674-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.06.029. Epub 2013 Jun 30.
4
5
Adjuvant (post-surgery) chemotherapy for early stage epithelial ovarian cancer.早期上皮性卵巢癌的辅助(术后)化疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jan 21(1):CD004706. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004706.pub2.
6
Ovarian cancer screening: Current status and future directions.卵巢癌筛查:现状与未来方向。
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2020 May;65:32-45. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2020.02.010. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
7
The role of ultrasound evaluation in the detection of early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer.超声评估在早期上皮性卵巢癌检测中的作用。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Apr;192(4):1214-21; discussion 1221-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.01.041.
8
Results of annual screening in phase I of the United Kingdom familial ovarian cancer screening study highlight the need for strict adherence to screening schedule.英国家族性卵巢癌筛查研究 I 期年度筛查的结果强调了严格遵循筛查计划的必要性。
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Jan 1;31(1):49-57. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.39.7638. Epub 2012 Dec 3.
9
[Screening for ovarian cancer].[卵巢癌筛查]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2000 May 10;120(12):1444-8.
10
Management of epithelial ovarian cancer.上皮性卵巢癌的管理
Clin Adv Hematol Oncol. 2018 Oct;16(10):656-659.

引用本文的文献

1
Molecular biomarkers for facilitating genome‑directed precision medicine in gynecological cancer (Review).促进妇科癌症基因组导向精准医学的分子生物标志物(综述)
Oncol Lett. 2023 Aug 17;26(4):426. doi: 10.3892/ol.2023.14012. eCollection 2023 Oct.
2
The effectiveness of hyperbaric oxygen therapy for managing radiation-induced proctitis - results of a 10-year retrospective cohort study.高压氧治疗放射性直肠炎的有效性——一项10年回顾性队列研究的结果
Front Oncol. 2023 Aug 11;13:1235237. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1235237. eCollection 2023.
3
Executive Summary of the Ovarian Cancer Evidence Review Conference.
卵巢癌证据审查会议执行摘要。
Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Jul 1;142(1):179-195. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005211. Epub 2023 Jun 7.
4
Solitary CNS Metastasis on Initial Presentation of High Grade Serous Carcinoma of the Fallopian Tube.输卵管高级别浆液性癌初诊时的孤立性中枢神经系统转移
Case Rep Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Dec 5;2018:6930986. doi: 10.1155/2018/6930986. eCollection 2018.