Suppr超能文献

乳腺摄影设施的沟通实践与 BI-RADS 0 评估的筛查性乳腺 X 光检查的及时随访。

Communication Practices of Mammography Facilities and Timely Follow-up of a Screening Mammogram with a BI-RADS 0 Assessment.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, 1316 Blockley Hall, 423 Guardian Drive, Philadelphia, PA 19104; Philadelphia VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA.

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.

出版信息

Acad Radiol. 2018 Sep;25(9):1118-1127. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2017.12.028. Epub 2018 Feb 9.

Abstract

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to evaluate the association of communication practices with timely follow-up of screening mammograms read as Breast Imaging Reporting and Data Systems (BI-RADS) 0 in the Population-based Research Optimizing Screening through Personalized Regimens (PROSPR) consortium.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A radiology facility survey was conducted in 2015 with responses linked to screening mammograms obtained in 2011-2014. We considered timely follow-up to be within 15 days of the screening mammogram. Generalized estimating equation models were used to evaluate the association between modes of communication with patients and providers and timely follow-up, adjusting for PROSPR site, patient age, and race and ethnicity.

RESULTS

The analysis included 34,680 mammography examinations with a BI-RADS 0 assessment among 28 facilities. Across facilities, 85.6% of examinations had a follow-up within 15 days. Patients in a facility where routine practice was to contact the patient by phone if follow-up imaging was recommended were more likely to have timely follow-up (odds ratio [OR] 4.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.76-7.76), whereas standard use of mail was associated with reduced timely follow-up (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.30-0.75). Facilities that had standard use of electronic medical records to report the need for follow-up imaging to a provider had less timely follow-up (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.35-0.90). Facilities that routinely contacted patients by mail if they missed a follow-up imaging visit were more likely to have timely follow-up (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.02-2.69).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings support the value of telephone communication to patients in relation to timely follow-up. Future research is needed to evaluate the role of communication in completing the breast cancer screening episode.

摘要

背景与目的

本研究旨在评估沟通实践与人群为基础的研究优化筛查通过个体化方案(PROSPR)联盟中乳腺影像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS)0 类筛查乳房 X 光片及时随访之间的关联。

材料与方法

2015 年进行了一项放射科设施调查,调查结果与 2011-2014 年获得的筛查乳房 X 光片相关联。我们认为及时随访是指在筛查乳房 X 光片后 15 天内。使用广义估计方程模型评估与患者和提供者沟通的模式与及时随访之间的关联,同时调整 PROSPR 地点、患者年龄、种族和族裔。

结果

该分析包括 28 个设施的 34680 例乳房 X 光检查,其中 BI-RADS 0 评估为 85.6%的检查在 15 天内进行了随访。如果建议进行随访成像,在常规实践中通过电话联系患者的设施中的患者更有可能及时进行随访(比值比[OR]4.63,95%置信区间[CI]2.76-7.76),而标准使用邮件则与及时随访减少相关(OR 0.47,95%CI 0.30-0.75)。标准使用电子病历向提供者报告需要进行随访成像的设施的及时随访较少(OR 0.56,95%CI 0.35-0.90)。如果患者错过随访成像就诊,常规通过邮件联系患者的设施更有可能进行及时随访(OR 1.65,95%CI 1.02-2.69)。

结论

我们的研究结果支持电话沟通对患者及时随访的价值。需要进一步研究沟通在完成乳腺癌筛查过程中的作用。

相似文献

1
Communication Practices of Mammography Facilities and Timely Follow-up of a Screening Mammogram with a BI-RADS 0 Assessment.
Acad Radiol. 2018 Sep;25(9):1118-1127. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2017.12.028. Epub 2018 Feb 9.
3
Impact of Telephone Communication on Patient Adherence With Follow-Up Recommendations After an Abnormal Screening Mammogram.
J Am Coll Radiol. 2020 Sep;17(9):1139-1148. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2020.03.030. Epub 2020 Apr 28.
4
Multilevel Predictors of Continued Adherence to Breast Cancer Screening Among Women Ages 50-74 Years in a Screening Population.
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2019 Aug;28(8):1051-1059. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2018.6997. Epub 2018 Nov 27.
5
Mammography facilities serving vulnerable women have longer follow-up times.
Health Serv Res. 2019 Feb;54 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):226-233. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13083. Epub 2018 Nov 5.
7
Women with abnormal screening mammography lost to follow-up: An experience from Taiwan.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Jun;95(24):e3889. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003889.
8
Follow-Up of Abnormal Breast and Colorectal Cancer Screening by Race/Ethnicity.
Am J Prev Med. 2016 Oct;51(4):507-12. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.03.017. Epub 2016 Apr 28.
9
Facility Mammography Volume in Relation to Breast Cancer Screening Outcomes.
J Med Screen. 2016 Mar;23(1):31-7. doi: 10.1177/0969141315595254. Epub 2015 Aug 11.
10
Assessment of a Risk-Based Approach for Triaging Mammography Examinations During Periods of Reduced Capacity.
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Mar 1;4(3):e211974. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.1974.

引用本文的文献

1
Delays in Follow-up Care for Abnormal Mammograms in Mobile Mammography Versus Fixed-Clinic Patients.
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 May;37(7):1619-1625. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-07189-3. Epub 2022 Feb 25.
2
The added value of an artificial intelligence system in assisting radiologists on indeterminate BI-RADS 0 mammograms.
Eur Radiol. 2022 Mar;32(3):1528-1537. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-08275-0. Epub 2021 Sep 15.
3
Patient vs Clinician Perspectives on Communication About Results of Lung Cancer Screening: A Qualitative Study.
Chest. 2020 Sep;158(3):1240-1249. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.03.081. Epub 2020 May 7.
6
Multilevel Predictors of Continued Adherence to Breast Cancer Screening Among Women Ages 50-74 Years in a Screening Population.
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2019 Aug;28(8):1051-1059. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2018.6997. Epub 2018 Nov 27.
7
Mammography facilities serving vulnerable women have longer follow-up times.
Health Serv Res. 2019 Feb;54 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):226-233. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13083. Epub 2018 Nov 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Electronic Health Record Alert-Related Workload as a Predictor of Burnout in Primary Care Providers.
Appl Clin Inform. 2017 Jul 5;8(3):686-697. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2017-01-RA-0003.
2
Effects of workload, work complexity, and repeated alerts on alert fatigue in a clinical decision support system.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017 Apr 10;17(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12911-017-0430-8.
3
JOURNAL CLUB: Predictors of Provider Response to Clinical Decision Support: Lessons Learned From the Medicare Imaging Demonstration.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Feb;208(2):351-357. doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.16373. Epub 2016 Nov 29.
4
Follow-Up of Abnormal Breast and Colorectal Cancer Screening by Race/Ethnicity.
Am J Prev Med. 2016 Oct;51(4):507-12. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.03.017. Epub 2016 Apr 28.
5
Screening for Breast Cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.
Ann Intern Med. 2016 Feb 16;164(4):279-96. doi: 10.7326/M15-2886. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
6
Conversations about Abnormal Mammograms on Distress and Timely Follow-up Across Ethnicity.
J Cancer Educ. 2017 Jun;32(2):320-327. doi: 10.1007/s13187-015-0918-9.
7
9
Consequences of false-positive screening mammograms.
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Jun;174(6):954-61. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.981.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验