• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

体重指数对尿道中段吊带手术后短期主观改善及再次手术风险的影响。

Influence of body mass index on short-term subjective improvement and risk of reoperation after mid-urethral sling surgery.

作者信息

Weltz Vibeke, Guldberg Rikke, Larsen Michael D, Magnussen Bjarne, Lose Gunnar

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Herlev University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.

出版信息

Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Apr;29(4):585-591. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3570-1. Epub 2018 Feb 12.

DOI:10.1007/s00192-018-3570-1
PMID:29435604
Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

The objective was to evaluate the impact of body mass index (BMI) on the subjective improvement and risk of reoperation after first-time mid-urethral sling surgery.

METHODS

Data were retrieved from the national Danish Urogynaecological Database, including women with first-time surgery with mid-urethral polypropylene slings from 2011 to 2016. The subjective improvement was assessed by the difference in symptoms based on the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-SF) completed pre- and 3 months postoperatively. A reoperation was defined as any new surgical procedure for stress urinary incontinence performed within the study period.

RESULTS

During the study period, 6,414 mid-urethral sling procedures were performed; 80.0% of these women filled out both pre- and post-surgical International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire (ICI-Q) forms. 42.4% had a BMI < 25, 34.6% had BMI 25-30, 16.9% had BMI 30-35, and 6.0% BMI >35. The subjective improvement after surgery was high in all BMI categories and there were no differences between the categories. The overall cumulative hazard proportion at 2 years of follow-up was 1.9% (CI 95%: 1.6-2.3) and after 5 years 2.4% (CI 95%: 2.0-2.9). Adjusted for age, smoking, and use of alcohol, the cumulative hazard proportion after 2 years of follow-up was 3.2% (CI 95%: 1.6-6.2) for women with BMI >35 and after 5 years 4.0% (CI 95%: 2.0-7.7), which was the highest proportion of reoperation in the study. The crude hazard ratio was 1.84 (CI 95%: 0.89-3.83) women with BMI >35 and the adjusted hazard ratio was 1.94 (CI 95%: 0.92-4.09).

CONCLUSIONS

We found high subjective improvement after the first-time surgery unrelated to BMI. Women with a BMI over 35 had the highest proportion of reoperations, although this was not statistically significant.

摘要

引言与假设

目的是评估体重指数(BMI)对首次中段尿道吊带手术后主观改善情况及再次手术风险的影响。

方法

数据取自丹麦国家泌尿妇科数据库,包括2011年至2016年接受首次中段尿道聚丙烯吊带手术的女性。主观改善情况通过基于术前及术后3个月填写的国际尿失禁咨询问卷简表(ICIQ-SF)的症状差异来评估。再次手术定义为在研究期间因压力性尿失禁进行的任何新的外科手术。

结果

在研究期间,共进行了6414例中段尿道吊带手术;其中80.0%的女性填写了术前和术后的国际尿失禁咨询问卷(ICI-Q)表格。42.4%的女性BMI<25,34.6%的女性BMI为25 - 30,16.9%的女性BMI为30 - 35,6.0%的女性BMI>35。所有BMI类别术后主观改善情况均良好,各类别之间无差异。随访2年时的总体累积风险比例为1.9%(95%CI:1.6 - 2.3),5年时为2.4%(95%CI:2.0 - 2.9)。在对年龄、吸烟和饮酒情况进行调整后,BMI>35的女性随访2年时的累积风险比例为3.2%(95%CI:1.6 - 6.2),5年时为4.0%(95%CI:2.0 - 7.7),这是研究中再次手术比例最高的情况。BMI>35的女性的粗风险比为1.84(95%CI:0.89 - 3.83),调整后的风险比为1.94(95%CI:0.92 - 4.09)。

结论

我们发现首次手术后主观改善情况良好,与BMI无关。BMI超过35的女性再次手术比例最高,尽管这在统计学上无显著意义。

相似文献

1
Influence of body mass index on short-term subjective improvement and risk of reoperation after mid-urethral sling surgery.体重指数对尿道中段吊带手术后短期主观改善及再次手术风险的影响。
Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Apr;29(4):585-591. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3570-1. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
2
Surgical treatment for urinary incontinence in women - Danish nationwide cohort studies
.女性尿失禁的外科治疗——丹麦全国队列研究
Dan Med J. 2018 Feb;65(2).
3
Reoperations for Female Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Finnish National Register Study.女性压力性尿失禁再次手术:一项芬兰全国注册研究。
Eur Urol Focus. 2018 Sep;4(5):754-759. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.05.005. Epub 2017 Jun 10.
4
Reoperation for urinary incontinence: a nationwide cohort study, 1998-2007.再次手术治疗尿失禁:1998-2007 年全国队列研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Feb;214(2):263.e1-263.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.069. Epub 2015 Sep 5.
5
Suburethral sling procedures in the United States: complications, readmission, and reoperation.美国尿道下吊带手术:并发症、再入院及再次手术情况
Int Urogynecol J. 2017 Oct;28(10):1463-1467. doi: 10.1007/s00192-017-3293-8. Epub 2017 Feb 24.
6
Predictors of sling revision after mid-urethral sling procedures: a case-control study.经尿道中段吊带手术后吊带修复的预测因素:病例对照研究。
BJOG. 2019 Feb;126(3):419-426. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15470. Epub 2018 Oct 24.
7
Multicentre randomized trial of the Ajust™ single-incision sling compared to the Align™ transobturator tape sling.Ajust™单切口吊带与Align™经闭孔带吊带的多中心随机试验。
Int Urogynecol J. 2017 Jul;28(7):1041-1047. doi: 10.1007/s00192-016-3221-3. Epub 2016 Dec 5.
8
Clinical epidemiological studies of women undergoing surgery for urogynaecological disorders.接受泌尿妇科疾病手术治疗的女性的临床流行病学研究。
Dan Med J. 2015 Oct;62(10):B5154.
9
Risk factors for failure of repeat midurethral sling surgery for recurrent or persistent stress urinary incontinence.复发性或持续性压力性尿失禁患者重复经阴道无张力尿道中段吊带术失败的危险因素。
Int Urogynecol J. 2016 Jun;27(6):923-31. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2912-5. Epub 2015 Dec 23.
10
Obesity as an independent risk factor for poor long-term outcome after mid-urethral sling surgery.肥胖是经尿道中段吊带术治疗后长期预后不良的独立危险因素。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2024 Aug;103(8):1657-1663. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14883. Epub 2024 Jun 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Commentary on: Influence of body mass index on short-term subjective improvement and risk of reoperation after mid-urethral sling surgery.关于《体重指数对经阴道尿道中段吊带术短期主观改善及再次手术风险的影响》的评论
Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Apr;29(4):593. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3606-6. Epub 2018 Mar 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Danish Urogynaecological Database.丹麦泌尿妇科数据库。
Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Oct 25;8:709-712. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S99511. eCollection 2016.
2
A comperative study for short-term surgical outcomes of midurethral sling procedures in obese and non-obese women with stress urinary incontinence.肥胖与非肥胖压力性尿失禁女性患者中尿道吊带手术短期手术效果的比较研究
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2016 Nov;36(8):1080-1085. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2016.1209169. Epub 2016 Oct 19.
3
Five years after midurethral sling surgery for stress incontinence: obesity continues to have an impact on outcomes.
治疗压力性尿失禁的中段尿道吊带手术后五年:肥胖持续影响治疗效果。
Int Urogynecol J. 2017 Apr;28(4):621-628. doi: 10.1007/s00192-016-3161-y. Epub 2016 Sep 29.
4
The Role of Obesity in Success and Complications in Patients Undergoing Retropubic Tension-Free Vaginal Tape Surgery.肥胖在耻骨后无张力阴道吊带手术患者的手术成功及并发症中的作用
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2016 May-Jun;22(3):161-5. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000241.
5
Influence of TVT properties on outcomes of midurethral sling procedures: high-stiffness versus low-stiffness tape.经阴道无张力尿道中段吊带术(TVT)特性对手术结果的影响:高硬度与低硬度吊带对比
Int Urogynecol J. 2016 Jul;27(7):1039-45. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2921-4. Epub 2016 Jan 15.
6
Repeat surgery after failed midurethral slings: a nationwide cohort study, 1998-2007.经尿道中段吊带术失败后的再次手术:一项1998 - 2007年的全国性队列研究
Int Urogynecol J. 2016 Jul;27(7):1013-9. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2925-0. Epub 2015 Dec 28.
7
Discrepancies between patient-reported outcome measures when assessing urinary incontinence or pelvic-prolapse surgery.评估尿失禁或盆腔器官脱垂手术时患者报告的结局指标之间的差异。
Int Urogynecol J. 2016 Apr;27(4):537-43. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2840-4. Epub 2015 Sep 25.
8
Efficacy and perioperative safety of synthetic mid-urethral slings in obese women with stress urinary incontinence.合成性中段尿道吊带治疗肥胖女性压力性尿失禁的疗效及围手术期安全性
Int Urogynecol J. 2015 May;26(5):641-8. doi: 10.1007/s00192-014-2567-7. Epub 2014 Nov 19.
9
Twelve-month outcomes following midurethral sling procedures for stress incontinence: impact of obesity.中尿道吊带术治疗压力性尿失禁 12 个月的结果:肥胖的影响。
BJOG. 2015 Nov;122(12):1705-12. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13132. Epub 2014 Oct 15.
10
The rapidly increasing usefulness of social media in urogynecology.社交媒体在女性盆底重建外科领域的应用价值迅速增长。
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2013 Jul-Aug;19(4):210-3. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0b013e3182909872.