• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

合成性中段尿道吊带治疗肥胖女性压力性尿失禁的疗效及围手术期安全性

Efficacy and perioperative safety of synthetic mid-urethral slings in obese women with stress urinary incontinence.

作者信息

Weltz V, Guldberg R, Lose G

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Herlev University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark,

出版信息

Int Urogynecol J. 2015 May;26(5):641-8. doi: 10.1007/s00192-014-2567-7. Epub 2014 Nov 19.

DOI:10.1007/s00192-014-2567-7
PMID:25407115
Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Obesity is associated with an increased prevalence of female stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Mid-urethral polypropylene sling is considered the surgical gold standard for treatment of SUI. We reviewed the current literature on efficacy at 1 year (or more) and perioperative safety of synthetic mid-urethral sling procedures for SUI in obese women.

METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane databases was performed using the MeSH terms "Stress urinary incontinence", "Overweight", "Obesity" and "Surgery". We included 13 full-text papers published from January 1995 to May 2014. We defined two groups of women: non-obese (BMI below 30 kg/m(2)) and obese (BMI above 30 kg/m(2)). Data regarding subjective and objective cure and selected perioperative complications were pooled and compared.

RESULTS

The pooled data from the 13 studies showed that 76.4% and 74.7% of non-obese and obese women, respectively, were subjectively cured (p = 0.70), and 83.3% and 79.2%, respectively, were objectively cured (p = 0.56). Bladder perforation was more frequently reported in non-obese women (p <  0.01). We did not detect a significant difference in postoperative urine retention or sling excision between the two groups (p = 0.36 and p = 0.17, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Cure rates were found to be comparable in obese and non-obese women. Perioperative complications were not reported to occur more often in obese women. The outcomes of sling procedures for SUI appear to be comparable in obese and non-obese women, and counselling of obese women regarding outcomes and perioperative complications can be similar.

摘要

引言与假设

肥胖与女性压力性尿失禁(SUI)患病率增加相关。尿道中段聚丙烯吊带被认为是治疗SUI的外科金标准。我们回顾了目前关于肥胖女性SUI的合成尿道中段吊带手术1年(或更长时间)疗效及围手术期安全性的文献。

方法

使用医学主题词“压力性尿失禁”、“超重”、“肥胖”和“手术”对PubMed、Embase和Cochrane数据库进行系统检索。我们纳入了1995年1月至2014年5月发表的13篇全文论文。我们将女性分为两组:非肥胖组(BMI低于30kg/m²)和肥胖组(BMI高于30kg/m²)。汇总并比较有关主观和客观治愈情况以及选定围手术期并发症的数据。

结果

13项研究的汇总数据显示,非肥胖和肥胖女性的主观治愈率分别为76.4%和74.7%(p = 0.70),客观治愈率分别为83.3%和79.2%(p = 0.56)。膀胱穿孔在非肥胖女性中报告更为频繁(p < 0.01)。我们未发现两组之间术后尿潴留或吊带切除有显著差异(分别为p = 0.36和p = 0.17)。

结论

发现肥胖和非肥胖女性的治愈率相当。未报告肥胖女性围手术期并发症更常发生。SUI吊带手术在肥胖和非肥胖女性中的结果似乎相当,并且可以向肥胖女性提供关于结果和围手术期并发症的类似咨询。

相似文献

1
Efficacy and perioperative safety of synthetic mid-urethral slings in obese women with stress urinary incontinence.合成性中段尿道吊带治疗肥胖女性压力性尿失禁的疗效及围手术期安全性
Int Urogynecol J. 2015 May;26(5):641-8. doi: 10.1007/s00192-014-2567-7. Epub 2014 Nov 19.
2
The impact of obesity on outcomes and complications after top-down retropubic midurethral sling.
Neurourol Urodyn. 2017 Jun;36(5):1330-1335. doi: 10.1002/nau.23098. Epub 2016 Aug 11.
3
Ultrasonography and clinical outcomes following surgical anti-incontinence procedures (Monarc vs Miniarc).手术抗尿失禁手术(Monarc与Miniarc)后的超声检查及临床结果
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014 Nov;182:91-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.09.015. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
4
Obesity as a risk factor for poor outcomes after sling surgery in women with stress urinary incontinence: A systematic review and meta-analysis.肥胖作为女性压力性尿失禁吊带手术后结局不佳的危险因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Neurourol Urodyn. 2020 Nov;39(8):2153-2160. doi: 10.1002/nau.24459. Epub 2020 Aug 14.
5
[Bladder injury during sling operation in the treatment of SUI--review of literature and case report].[吊带手术治疗压力性尿失禁时的膀胱损伤——文献综述与病例报告]
Ginekol Pol. 2012 Oct;83(10):784-8.
6
Prospective randomized comparison of the transobturator mid-urethral sling with the single-incision sling among women with stress urinary incontinence: 1-year follow-up study.压力性尿失禁女性经闭孔中尿道吊带与单切口吊带的前瞻性随机对照研究:1年随访研究
Int Urogynecol J. 2016 May;27(5):791-6. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2895-2. Epub 2015 Dec 2.
7
Incontinence surgery in obese women: comparative analysis of short- and long-term outcomes with a transobturator sling.肥胖女性的尿失禁手术:经闭孔吊带术短期和长期疗效的比较分析
Int Urogynecol J. 2016 Feb;27(2):247-53. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2820-8. Epub 2015 Aug 30.
8
Five years after midurethral sling surgery for stress incontinence: obesity continues to have an impact on outcomes.治疗压力性尿失禁的中段尿道吊带手术后五年:肥胖持续影响治疗效果。
Int Urogynecol J. 2017 Apr;28(4):621-628. doi: 10.1007/s00192-016-3161-y. Epub 2016 Sep 29.
9
A comperative study for short-term surgical outcomes of midurethral sling procedures in obese and non-obese women with stress urinary incontinence.肥胖与非肥胖压力性尿失禁女性患者中尿道吊带手术短期手术效果的比较研究
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2016 Nov;36(8):1080-1085. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2016.1209169. Epub 2016 Oct 19.
10
Two-year evaluation of the MiniArc in obese versus non-obese patients for treatment of stress urinary incontinence.肥胖与非肥胖患者中 MiniArc 治疗压力性尿失禁的两年评估。
Int J Urol. 2013 Apr;20(4):434-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2012.03147.x. Epub 2012 Sep 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Obesity as an independent risk factor for poor long-term outcome after mid-urethral sling surgery.肥胖是经尿道中段吊带术治疗后长期预后不良的独立危险因素。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2024 Aug;103(8):1657-1663. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14883. Epub 2024 Jun 11.
2
Impact of severe obesity on long-term success and complications of the retropubic midurethral sling.重度肥胖对经耻骨后尿道中段吊带术长期成功率和并发症的影响。
Int Urogynecol J. 2021 Jan;32(1):57-63. doi: 10.1007/s00192-020-04414-1. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
3
Obesity and Stress Urinary Incontinence: Impact on Pathophysiology and Treatment.

本文引用的文献

1
Single incision mid-urethral slings: impact of obesity on outcomes.单切口经尿道中段吊带术:肥胖对结局的影响。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013 Oct;170(2):571-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.08.007. Epub 2013 Aug 11.
2
Two-year evaluation of the MiniArc in obese versus non-obese patients for treatment of stress urinary incontinence.肥胖与非肥胖患者中 MiniArc 治疗压力性尿失禁的两年评估。
Int J Urol. 2013 Apr;20(4):434-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2012.03147.x. Epub 2012 Sep 19.
3
Efficacy and safety of tension-free vaginal tape compared with transobturator tape among obese women with stress urinary incontinence: a retrospective cohort study.
肥胖与压力性尿失禁:对病理生理学及治疗的影响
Curr Urol Rep. 2018 Feb 22;19(1):10. doi: 10.1007/s11934-018-0762-7.
4
Influence of body mass index on short-term subjective improvement and risk of reoperation after mid-urethral sling surgery.体重指数对尿道中段吊带手术后短期主观改善及再次手术风险的影响。
Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Apr;29(4):585-591. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3570-1. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
5
Antimicrobial and anti-biofilm properties of polypropylene meshes coated with metal-containing DLC thin films.含金属类金刚石薄膜涂层聚丙烯网片的抗菌及抗生物膜特性
J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2017 Jun;28(6):97. doi: 10.1007/s10856-017-5910-y. Epub 2017 May 17.
6
Association of Body Mass Index With Infectious Complications in Free Tissue Transfer for Head and Neck Reconstructive Surgery.体重指数与头颈部重建手术游离组织移植术后感染并发症的关联
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Jun 1;143(6):574-579. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2016.4304.
7
Obesity and stress urinary incontinence in women: compromised continence mechanism or excess bladder pressure during cough?女性肥胖与压力性尿失禁:控尿机制受损还是咳嗽时膀胱压力过高?
Int Urogynecol J. 2017 Sep;28(9):1377-1385. doi: 10.1007/s00192-017-3279-6. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
8
Five years after midurethral sling surgery for stress incontinence: obesity continues to have an impact on outcomes.治疗压力性尿失禁的中段尿道吊带手术后五年:肥胖持续影响治疗效果。
Int Urogynecol J. 2017 Apr;28(4):621-628. doi: 10.1007/s00192-016-3161-y. Epub 2016 Sep 29.
9
Influence of TVT properties on outcomes of midurethral sling procedures: high-stiffness versus low-stiffness tape.经阴道无张力尿道中段吊带术(TVT)特性对手术结果的影响:高硬度与低硬度吊带对比
Int Urogynecol J. 2016 Jul;27(7):1039-45. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2921-4. Epub 2016 Jan 15.
压力性尿失禁肥胖女性中无张力阴道吊带与经闭孔吊带的疗效及安全性比较:一项回顾性队列研究
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2012 Aug;34(8):755-759. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)35339-7.
4
Clinical impact of body mass index on the outcome of the SPARC-sling system for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence.体重指数对 SPARC 吊带系统治疗女性压力性尿失禁疗效的临床影响。
World J Urol. 2013 Aug;31(4):875-80. doi: 10.1007/s00345-011-0805-x. Epub 2011 Dec 4.
5
Surgical outcome of transobturator tape procedure in obese and non-obese women.肥胖和非肥胖女性经闭孔尿道中段无张力吊带术的手术结果
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2011 Oct;31(7):645-9. doi: 10.3109/01443615.2011.597461.
6
Is obesity a risk factor for failure and complications after surgery for incontinence and prolapse in women?肥胖是否是女性尿失禁和脱垂手术失败和并发症的危险因素?
J Urol. 2011 Mar;185(3):987-92. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.10.064. Epub 2011 Jan 19.
7
Body mass index does not influence the outcome of anti-incontinence surgery among women whereas menopausal status and ageing do: a randomised trial.体重指数不影响女性抗尿失禁手术的结果,而绝经状态和衰老则有影响:一项随机试验。
Int Urogynecol J. 2010 Jul;21(7):801-6. doi: 10.1007/s00192-010-1116-2. Epub 2010 Feb 24.
8
One-year outcomes of tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) mid-urethral slings in overweight and obese women.超重和肥胖女性无张力阴道吊带术(TVT)治疗中尿道吊带的一年疗效
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009 Sep;20(9):1103-8. doi: 10.1007/s00192-009-0909-7. Epub 2009 May 16.
9
A systematic review of overweight and obesity as risk factors and targets for clinical intervention for urinary incontinence in women.超重和肥胖作为女性尿失禁临床干预的风险因素及干预目标的系统评价
Neurourol Urodyn. 2008;27(8):749-57. doi: 10.1002/nau.20635.
10
The very obese woman and the very old woman: tension-free vaginal tape for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence.极度肥胖女性和高龄女性:经阴道无张力尿道中段吊带术治疗压力性尿失禁
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2007 Apr;18(4):423-9. doi: 10.1007/s00192-006-0162-2. Epub 2006 Jul 26.