School of Medicine, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.
School of Psychology, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.
Nutr Diet. 2018 Jul;75(3):250-255. doi: 10.1111/1747-0080.12405. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
The psychological construct of 'therapeutic alliance' can be used to better understand the effectiveness of consultations, particularly goal setting for weight management. We analysed audio-recorded health coaching sessions during a weight loss trial to explore relationships between therapeutic alliance and various contextual factors.
Audio recordings of 50 health coaching sessions were analysed. After assessing fidelity to the protocol, therapeutic alliance was measured using an adapted Working Alliance Inventory Observer-rated Short Version (WAI-O-S), and examined by (i) identifying relationships between contextual factors and WAI-O-S scores (Spearman's coefficients); (ii) testing the impact of preparatory exercises and body mass index on WAI-O-S scores (one-way analysis of variance and least-squared differences tests) and (iii) comparing differences in WAI-O-S scores based on relationship status, gender and follow-up session completion (independent samples t-tests).
Fidelity was high (mean 88%). WAI-O-S total scores ranged from 55 to 70 (out of 84). Session duration was significantly correlated with WAI-O-S component of 'Bond' (r = 0.42, P = 0.002). Those who completed preparatory exercises had significantly higher total WAI-O-S scores, 'Goal' and 'Task' scores. Participants who completed the follow-up session scored significantly higher for 'Goal' compared to no follow-up.
Spending more time in a session appears related to increased bonding, a key component of therapeutic alliance. Preparatory work may help build therapeutic alliance and agreement on goals appears to influence follow-up completion. These exploratory findings provide directions for research addressing the professional relationship in dietetic consultations for weight loss.
“治疗联盟”的心理结构可用于更好地理解咨询的有效性,尤其是在体重管理的目标设定方面。我们分析了减肥试验中的音频记录健康辅导课程,以探讨治疗联盟与各种背景因素之间的关系。
对 50 次健康辅导课程的音频记录进行了分析。在评估对方案的保真度后,使用改编的工作联盟量表观察评分简短版(WAI-O-S)测量治疗联盟,并通过以下方法进行检查:(i)确定背景因素与 WAI-O-S 评分之间的关系(Spearman 系数);(ii)测试预备练习和体重指数对 WAI-O-S 评分的影响(单因素方差分析和最小二乘法检验);(iii)根据关系状况,性别和随访课程完成情况比较 WAI-O-S 评分的差异(独立样本 t 检验)。
保真度很高(平均 88%)。WAI-O-S 总分范围为 55 至 70(满分 84 分)。会话持续时间与 WAI-O-S 的“联系”组成部分显著相关(r=0.42,P=0.002)。完成预备练习的人总 WAI-O-S 评分,“目标”和“任务”评分明显更高。完成随访课程的参与者在“目标”方面的得分明显高于未完成随访的参与者。
在会议上花费更多时间似乎与增强联系有关,而联系是治疗联盟的关键组成部分。预备工作可能有助于建立治疗联盟,并且在目标上的共识似乎会影响随访的完成。这些探索性发现为解决减肥饮食咨询中的专业关系的研究提供了方向。