Kiluk Brian D, Serafini Kelly, Frankforter Tami, Nich Charla, Carroll Kathleen M
Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06511, USA.
Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06511, USA.
Behav Res Ther. 2014 Dec;63:139-46. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2014.10.003. Epub 2014 Oct 23.
The limited role of therapists in some technology-based interventions raises questions as to whether clients may develop a 'working alliance' with the program, and the impact on relationships with a therapist and/or treatment outcomes. In this study, the Working Alliance Inventory (WAI), and an adapted version for technology-based interventions (WAI-Tech), were administered within a subsample (n = 66) of cocaine-dependent individuals participating in a randomized trial evaluating the efficacy of Computer-Based Training for Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT4CBT) as an adjunct to treatment as usual (TAU). Results suggest the WAI-Tech has relatively similar psychometric characteristics as the standard WAI; however the 'bond' subscale scores were lower on the WAI-Tech [F(1,52) = 5.78, p < .05]. Scores on the WAI-Tech were not associated with cocaine use outcomes, whereas total scores on the WAI for those assigned to TAU were associated with the percentage of days abstinent from cocaine (r = .43, p < .05). There was little evidence that adding a technology-based intervention adversely affected the working alliance with a therapist in this sample. These preliminary findings suggest some concepts of working alliance may apply to computer-based CBT, yet the function of the alliance may be different in technology-based interventions than in face-to-face psychotherapies.
在一些基于技术的干预措施中,治疗师的作用有限,这引发了一些问题,比如客户是否能与该项目建立“工作联盟”,以及这对与治疗师的关系和/或治疗结果的影响。在本研究中,对参与一项随机试验的66名可卡因依赖个体的子样本进行了工作联盟量表(WAI)以及基于技术的干预措施的改编版(WAI-Tech)的施测。该随机试验评估了基于计算机的认知行为疗法培训(CBT4CBT)作为常规治疗(TAU)辅助手段的疗效。结果表明,WAI-Tech具有与标准WAI相对相似的心理测量特征;然而,WAI-Tech的“联结”分量表得分较低[F(1,52) = 5.78,p <.05]。WAI-Tech的得分与可卡因使用结果无关,而分配到TAU组的个体的WAI总分与可卡因戒断天数的百分比相关(r =.43,p <.05)。几乎没有证据表明在该样本中添加基于技术的干预措施会对与治疗师的工作联盟产生不利影响。这些初步发现表明,工作联盟的一些概念可能适用于基于计算机的认知行为疗法,但联盟在基于技术的干预措施中的作用可能与面对面心理治疗中的作用不同。