• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

间接轮状病毒疫苗预防轮状病毒住院的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Indirect Rotavirus Vaccine Effectiveness for the Prevention of Rotavirus Hospitalization: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.

出版信息

Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2018 Apr;98(4):1197-1201. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.17-0705. Epub 2018 Feb 8.

DOI:10.4269/ajtmh.17-0705
PMID:29436336
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5928826/
Abstract

Two rotavirus vaccines, RotaTeq and Rotarix, are licensed for global use; however, the protection they confer to unvaccinated individuals through indirect effects remains unknown. We systematically reviewed the literature and quantified indirect rotavirus vaccine effectiveness (VE) for preventing rotavirus hospitalization in children aged less than 5 years. From 148 identified abstracts, 14 studies met our eligibility criteria. In our main analysis using a random-effects model, indirect rotavirus VE was 48% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 39-55%). In a subgroup analysis by country income level, indirect VE was greater in high-income countries (52%; 95% CI: 43-60%) than in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) (25%; 95% CI: 5-41%). In a sensitivity analysis using a quality-effects model, the indirect VE in LMICs was not statistically significant (25%; 95% CI: 0-44%). Our findings highlight the importance of increasing rotavirus vaccine coverage, particularly in LMICs where evidence for indirect VE is limited and rotavirus burden is high.

摘要

两种轮状病毒疫苗,Rotarix 和 RotaTeq,已在全球获得许可;然而,它们通过间接效应对未接种疫苗的个体提供的保护仍然未知。我们系统地审查了文献,并量化了预防 5 岁以下儿童轮状病毒住院的间接轮状病毒疫苗有效性(VE)。从 148 篇已确定的摘要中,有 14 项研究符合我们的入选标准。在我们使用随机效应模型的主要分析中,间接轮状病毒 VE 为 48%(95%置信区间 [CI]:39-55%)。按国家收入水平进行的亚组分析显示,高收入国家(52%;95%CI:43-60%)的间接 VE 高于中低收入国家(LMICs)(25%;95%CI:5-41%)。在使用质量效应模型的敏感性分析中,LMICs 中的间接 VE 不具有统计学意义(25%;95%CI:0-44%)。我们的研究结果强调了增加轮状病毒疫苗覆盖率的重要性,特别是在间接 VE 证据有限且轮状病毒负担较高的 LMICs 中。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e6c/5928826/0c9ef9d9d3d3/tpmd170705f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e6c/5928826/43d19a38ae26/tpmd170705f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e6c/5928826/b844b47e3eab/tpmd170705f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e6c/5928826/0c9ef9d9d3d3/tpmd170705f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e6c/5928826/43d19a38ae26/tpmd170705f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e6c/5928826/b844b47e3eab/tpmd170705f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e6c/5928826/0c9ef9d9d3d3/tpmd170705f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Indirect Rotavirus Vaccine Effectiveness for the Prevention of Rotavirus Hospitalization: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.间接轮状病毒疫苗预防轮状病毒住院的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2018 Apr;98(4):1197-1201. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.17-0705. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
2
Population effectiveness of the pentavalent and monovalent rotavirus vaccines: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.五价和单价轮状病毒疫苗的人群有效性:观察性研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
BMC Infect Dis. 2017 Aug 15;17(1):569. doi: 10.1186/s12879-017-2613-4.
3
Do Rotavirus Strains Affect Vaccine Effectiveness? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.轮状病毒株是否影响疫苗效力?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2021 Dec 1;40(12):1135-1143. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000003286.
4
Effectiveness of rotavirus vaccine in preventing severe gastroenteritis in young children according to socioeconomic status.根据社会经济地位,轮状病毒疫苗预防幼儿严重胃肠炎的有效性。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2016 Oct 2;12(10):2572-2579. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2016.1189038. Epub 2016 Jul 1.
5
Long-term Consistency in Rotavirus Vaccine Protection: RV5 and RV1 Vaccine Effectiveness in US Children, 2012-2013.轮状病毒疫苗保护的长期一致性:2012 - 2013年美国儿童中RV5和RV1疫苗的有效性
Clin Infect Dis. 2015 Dec 15;61(12):1792-9. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ872. Epub 2015 Oct 8.
6
Vaccines for preventing rotavirus diarrhoea: vaccines in use.预防轮状病毒腹泻的疫苗:正在使用的疫苗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Feb 15(2):CD008521. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008521.pub2.
7
Effectiveness of self-financed rotavirus vaccination in Ise City, Japan.日本伊势市自费轮状病毒疫苗接种的效果。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2021 Dec 2;17(12):5650-5655. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2021.1972706. Epub 2021 Oct 12.
8
Association of Rotavirus Vaccines With Reduction in Rotavirus Gastroenteritis in Children Younger Than 5 Years: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials and Observational Studies.轮状病毒疫苗与 5 岁以下儿童轮状病毒胃肠炎减少的关联:随机临床试验和观察性研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Pediatr. 2021 Jul 1;175(7):e210347. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2021.0347. Epub 2021 Jul 6.
9
A decade of experience with rotavirus vaccination in the United States - vaccine uptake, effectiveness, and impact.美国轮状病毒疫苗接种十年经验:疫苗接种率、有效性和影响。
Expert Rev Vaccines. 2018 Jul;17(7):593-606. doi: 10.1080/14760584.2018.1489724. Epub 2018 Jul 2.
10
Real-world effectiveness of rotavirus vaccines, 2006-19: a literature review and meta-analysis.2006-2019 年轮状病毒疫苗的真实世界效果:文献回顾和荟萃分析。
Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Sep;8(9):e1195-e1202. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30262-X.

引用本文的文献

1
Indirect Effects of Universal Infant Rotavirus Vaccination: A Narrative Systematic Review.通用婴儿轮状病毒疫苗的间接影响:一项叙述性系统评价
Vaccines (Basel). 2025 May 9;13(5):503. doi: 10.3390/vaccines13050503.
2
Indirect protection from rotavirus vaccines: a systematic review.轮状病毒疫苗的间接保护作用:系统评价。
Expert Rev Vaccines. 2024 Jan-Dec;23(1):789-795. doi: 10.1080/14760584.2024.2395534. Epub 2024 Sep 1.
3
Effectiveness of self-financed rotavirus vaccines on acute gastroenteritis primary care episodes using real-world data in Spain: a propensity score-matched analysis of cohort study.

本文引用的文献

1
Estimates of global, regional, and national morbidity, mortality, and aetiologies of diarrhoeal diseases: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015.全球、区域和国家腹泻病的发病率、死亡率及病因估计:全球疾病负担研究2015的系统分析
Lancet Infect Dis. 2017 Sep;17(9):909-948. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30276-1. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
2
Effectiveness of a live oral human rotavirus vaccine after programmatic introduction in Bangladesh: A cluster-randomized trial.孟加拉国引入口服轮状病毒活疫苗后的效果:一项整群随机试验。
PLoS Med. 2017 Apr 18;14(4):e1002282. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002282. eCollection 2017 Apr.
3
利用西班牙真实世界数据评估自费轮状病毒疫苗对急性肠胃炎初级保健发病的效果:一项基于倾向评分匹配队列研究的分析。
Eur J Pediatr. 2024 Jul;183(7):2843-2853. doi: 10.1007/s00431-024-05536-0. Epub 2024 Apr 7.
4
Estimating the global impact of rotavirus vaccines on child mortality.估算轮状病毒疫苗对儿童死亡率的全球影响。
Int J Infect Dis. 2023 Dec;137:90-97. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2023.10.005. Epub 2023 Oct 18.
5
Rotavirus vaccine product switch in Ghana: An assessment of service delivery costs, switching costs, and cost-effectiveness.加纳轮状病毒疫苗产品转换:服务提供成本、转换成本及成本效益评估
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Aug 9;3(8):e0001328. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001328. eCollection 2023.
6
Predicting indirect effects of rotavirus vaccination programs on rotavirus mortality among children in 112 countries.预测112个国家中轮状病毒疫苗接种计划对儿童轮状病毒死亡率的间接影响。
NPJ Vaccines. 2023 Mar 4;8(1):32. doi: 10.1038/s41541-023-00632-y.
7
Community-level interventions for mitigating the risk of waterborne diarrheal diseases: a systematic review.社区层面干预措施降低水源性腹泻病风险:系统评价。
Syst Rev. 2022 Apr 18;11(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s13643-022-01947-y.
8
Understanding Rotavirus Vaccine Efficacy and Effectiveness in Countries with High Child Mortality.了解轮状病毒疫苗在儿童死亡率高的国家的效力和效果。
Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Feb 23;10(3):346. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10030346.
9
Rotavirus gastroenteritis hospitalizations in provinces with different vaccination coverage rates in Spain, 2013-2018.2013-2018 年西班牙不同疫苗接种覆盖率省份的轮状病毒胃肠炎住院情况。
BMC Infect Dis. 2021 Nov 6;21(1):1138. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06841-x.
10
Quantification and Trends of Rotavirus and Enterovirus in Untreated Sewage Using Reverse Transcription Droplet Digital PCR.采用逆转录液滴数字 PCR 技术定量检测未经处理污水中的轮状病毒和肠病毒及其变化趋势
Food Environ Virol. 2021 Jun;13(2):154-169. doi: 10.1007/s12560-020-09455-9. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) for 315 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE), 1990-2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015.
1990 - 2015年全球、区域和国家315种疾病和损伤的伤残调整生命年(DALYs)及健康预期寿命(HALE):全球疾病负担研究2015的系统分析
Lancet. 2016 Oct 8;388(10053):1603-1658. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31460-X.
4
A Systematic Review of the Effect of Rotavirus Vaccination on Diarrhea Outcomes Among Children Younger Than 5 Years.轮状病毒疫苗对5岁以下儿童腹泻结局影响的系统评价
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2016 Sep;35(9):992-8. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000001232.
5
Population-Level Impact of Ontario's Infant Rotavirus Immunization Program: Evidence of Direct and Indirect Effects.安大略省婴儿轮状病毒免疫计划对人群的影响:直接和间接效应的证据
PLoS One. 2016 May 11;11(5):e0154340. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154340. eCollection 2016.
6
Impact of Rotavirus Vaccine Introduction and Vaccine Effectiveness in the Republic of Moldova.轮状病毒疫苗引入及疫苗效力对摩尔多瓦共和国的影响
Clin Infect Dis. 2016 May 1;62 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S140-6. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ1209.
7
Rapid Declines in Age Group-Specific Rotavirus Infection and Acute Gastroenteritis Among Vaccinated and Unvaccinated Individuals Within 1 Year of Rotavirus Vaccine Introduction in England and Wales.英格兰和威尔士在引入轮状病毒疫苗后 1 年内,疫苗接种者和未接种者的年龄特异性轮状病毒感染和急性胃肠炎均迅速减少。
J Infect Dis. 2016 Jan 15;213(2):243-9. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiv398. Epub 2015 Jul 30.
8
Estimating the herd immunity effect of rotavirus vaccine.评估轮状病毒疫苗的群体免疫效果。
Vaccine. 2015 Jul 31;33(32):3795-800. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.06.064. Epub 2015 Jun 23.
9
Rotavirus vaccines and health care utilization for diarrhea in the United States (2007-2011).美国轮状病毒疫苗与腹泻的医疗保健利用情况(2007 - 2011年)
Pediatrics. 2014 Jul;134(1):15-23. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-3849. Epub 2014 Jun 9.
10
Direct, indirect, total, and overall effectiveness of the rotavirus vaccines for the prevention of gastroenteritis hospitalizations in privately insured US children, 2007-2010.2007-2010 年,轮状病毒疫苗对美国私人保险儿童预防胃肠炎住院的直接、间接、总有效率和全面有效率。
Am J Epidemiol. 2014 Apr 1;179(7):895-909. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwu001. Epub 2014 Feb 26.