Drug Delivery, Disposition and Dynamics, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018 Mar 27;62(4). doi: 10.1128/AAC.02055-17. Print 2018 Apr.
Hypermutable strains are prevalent in patients with cystic fibrosis and rapidly become resistant to antibiotic monotherapies. Combination dosage regimens have not been optimized against such strains using mechanism-based modeling (MBM) and the hollow-fiber infection model (HFIM). The PAO1 wild-type strain and its isogenic hypermutable PAOΔ strain (MIC of 1.0 mg/liter and MIC of 0.5 mg/liter for both) were assessed using 96-h static-concentration time-kill studies (SCTK) and 10-day HFIM studies (inoculum, ∼10 CFU/ml). MBM of SCTK data were performed to predict expected HFIM outcomes. Regimens studied in the HFIM were meropenem at 1 g every 8 h (0.5-h infusion), meropenem at 3 g/day with continuous infusion, tobramycin at 10 mg/kg of body weight every 24 h (1-h infusion), and both combinations. Meropenem regimens delivered the same total daily dose. Time courses of total and less susceptible populations and MICs were determined. For the PAOΔ strain in the HFIM, all monotherapies resulted in rapid regrowth to >10 CFU/ml with near-complete replacement by less susceptible bacteria by day 3. Meropenem every 8 h with tobramycin caused >7-log bacterial killing followed by regrowth to >6 log CFU/ml by day 5 and high-level resistance (MIC, 32 mg/liter; MIC, 8 mg/liter). Continuous infusion of meropenem with tobramycin achieved >8-log bacterial killing without regrowth. For PAO1, meropenem monotherapies suppressed bacterial growth to <4 log over 7 to 9 days, with both combination regimens achieving near eradication. An MBM-optimized meropenem plus tobramycin regimen achieved synergistic killing and resistance suppression against a difficult-to-treat hypermutable strain. For the combination to be maximally effective, it was critical to achieve the optimal shape of the concentration-time profile for meropenem.
高突变菌株在囊性纤维化患者中很常见,并且它们对抗生素单药治疗迅速产生耐药性。针对这种菌株,尚未使用基于机制的建模 (MBM) 和中空纤维感染模型 (HFIM) 对组合剂量方案进行优化。使用 96 小时静态浓度时间杀伤研究 (SCTK) 和 10 天 HFIM 研究 (接种物,约 10 CFU/ml) 评估了 PAO1 野生型菌株及其同源高突变 PAOΔ 菌株 (两者的 MIC 为 1.0 mg/l 和 MIC 为 0.5 mg/l)。对 SCTK 数据进行 MBM 以预测 HFIM 结果。在 HFIM 中研究的方案是每 8 小时给予 1 克美罗培南(0.5 小时输注)、每天给予 3 克美罗培南持续输注、每 24 小时给予 10 毫克/公斤体重妥布霉素(1 小时输注)以及这两种组合。美罗培南方案提供相同的每日总剂量。确定总种群和敏感性降低种群以及 MIC 的时间过程。对于 HFIM 中的 PAOΔ 菌株,所有单药治疗在第 3 天迅速恢复到>10 CFU/ml,几乎完全被敏感性降低的细菌取代。每 8 小时给予美罗培南加妥布霉素导致细菌杀伤>7 对数级,然后在第 5 天恢复到>6 log CFU/ml,出现高水平耐药性(MIC,32 mg/l;MIC,8 mg/l)。美罗培南持续输注加妥布霉素实现>8 对数级的细菌杀伤而无恢复。对于 PAO1,美罗培南单药治疗在 7 至 9 天内将细菌生长抑制到<4 对数级,两种联合方案均接近根除。经 MBM 优化的美罗培南加妥布霉素方案对一种难以治疗的高突变菌株实现协同杀菌和耐药性抑制。为了使联合治疗效果最大化,关键是要实现美罗培南浓度-时间曲线的最佳形状。