Suppr超能文献

卡格列净与其他非格列净类抗糖尿病药物相关的心血管结局:基于人群的队列研究。

Cardiovascular outcomes associated with canagliflozin versus other non-gliflozin antidiabetic drugs: population based cohort study.

作者信息

Patorno Elisabetta, Goldfine Allison B, Schneeweiss Sebastian, Everett Brendan M, Glynn Robert J, Liu Jun, Kim Seoyoung C

机构信息

Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 1620 Tremont St, Suite 3030, Boston, MA 02120, USA

Joslin Diabetes Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

BMJ. 2018 Feb 6;360:k119. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k119.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the cardiovascular safety of canagliflozin, a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus, in direct comparisons with DPP-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i), GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA), or sulfonylureas, as used in routine practice.

DESIGN

Population based retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Nationwide sample of patients with type 2 diabetes from a large de-identified US commercial healthcare database (Optum Clinformatics Datamart).

PARTICIPANTS

Three pairwise 1:1 propensity score matched cohorts of patients with type 2 diabetes 18 years and older who initiated canagliflozin or a comparator non-gliflozin antidiabetic agent (ie, a DPP-4i, a GLP-1RA, or a sulfonylurea) between April 2013 and September 2015.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcomes were heart failure admission to hospital and a composite cardiovascular endpoint (comprised of being admitted to hospital for acute myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, or hemorrhagic stroke). Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals were estimated in each propensity score matched cohort controlling for more than 100 baseline characteristics.

RESULTS

During a 30 month period, the hazard ratio for heart failure admission to hospital associated with canagliflozin was 0.70 (95% confidence interval 0.54 to 0.92) versus a DPP-4i (n=17 667 pairs), 0.61 (0.47 to 0.78) versus a GLP-1RA (20 539), and 0.51 (0.38 to 0.67) versus a sulfonylurea (17 354 ). The hazard ratio for the composite cardiovascular endpoint associated with canagliflozin was 0.89 (0.68 to 1.17) versus a DPP-4i, 1.03 (0.79 to 1.35) versus a GLP-1RA, and 0.86 (0.65 to 1.13) versus a sulfonylurea. Results were similar in sensitivity analyses further adjusting for baseline hemoglobin A1c levels and in subgroups of patients with and without prior cardiovascular disease or heart failure.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large cohort study, canagliflozin was associated with a lower risk of heart failure admission to hospital and with a similar risk of myocardial infarction or stroke in direct comparisons with three different classes of non-gliflozin diabetes treatment alternatives as used in routine care.

摘要

目的

在与二肽基肽酶4抑制剂(DPP-4i)、胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1RA)或磺脲类药物进行直接比较时,评估用于治疗2型糖尿病的钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂卡格列净的心血管安全性,这些药物均为常规使用药物。

设计

基于人群的回顾性队列研究。

设置

从美国一个大型匿名商业医疗保健数据库(Optum Clinformatics Datamart)中选取全国范围内的2型糖尿病患者样本。

参与者

三个1:1倾向评分匹配的队列,队列中的患者为18岁及以上的2型糖尿病患者,他们在2013年4月至2015年9月期间开始使用卡格列净或一种对照非格列净类抗糖尿病药物(即DPP-4i、GLP-1RA或磺脲类药物)。

主要结局指标

主要结局为因心力衰竭入院以及复合心血管终点(包括因急性心肌梗死、缺血性中风或出血性中风入院)。在每个倾向评分匹配队列中,控制100多个基线特征后估计风险比和95%置信区间。

结果

在30个月期间,与DPP-4i(n = 17667对)相比,卡格列净导致因心力衰竭入院的风险比为0.70(95%置信区间0.54至0.92);与GLP-1RA(20539对)相比为0.61(0.47至0.78);与磺脲类药物(17354对)相比为0.51(0.38至0.67)。与DPP-4i相比,卡格列净的复合心血管终点风险比为0.89(0.68至1.17);与GLP-1RA相比为1.03(0.79至1.35);与磺脲类药物相比为0.86(0.65至1.13)。在进一步根据基线糖化血红蛋白水平进行调整的敏感性分析以及有或无既往心血管疾病或心力衰竭的患者亚组中,结果相似。

结论

在这项大型队列研究中,与常规治疗中使用的三类不同的非格列净类糖尿病治疗药物进行直接比较时,卡格列净与因心力衰竭入院的较低风险相关,且与心肌梗死或中风的风险相似。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5428/5799855/50ca1b220460/pate039998.f1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验