Suppr超能文献

《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版中的忧郁症:这些标准能否准确且可靠地区分内源性抑郁症模式?

DSM-III melancholia: do the criteria accurately and reliably distinguish endogenous pattern depression?

作者信息

Copolov D L, Rubin R T, Mander A J, Sashidharan S P, Whitehouse A M, Blackburn I M, Freeman C P, Blackwood D H

出版信息

J Affect Disord. 1986 May-Jun;10(3):191-202. doi: 10.1016/0165-0327(86)90004-2.

Abstract

The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III (SCID), Newcastle Endogenous/Reactive Index, Feinberg-Carroll Discriminant Index, and Hamilton Depression Scale were used to assess 70 depressed patients in order to determine similarities and differences in symptom structure and severity in those patients with and without endogenous/melancholic depression. All patients with melancholia according to DSM-III had definite endogenous major depression by the Research Diagnostic Criteria (RDC), but only 20 out of 35 patients with RDC definite endogenous depression were DSM-III melancholic. There was a greater difference in symptom pattern between those patients with definite endogenous depression and those with probable or non-endogenous depression than there was between the melancholic and non-melancholic definite endogenous depressives. A prerequisite for the valid delineation of a nosological category is the establishment of good reliability for diagnostic criteria. Using SCID ratings of audiotaped interviews of 9 patients (5 with major depression), the 8 raters in this study achieved a kappa coefficient of 0.79, suggesting that the use of a structured interview can improve the reliability of DSM-III diagnoses. Interrater reliabilities for most of the individual DSM-III major depressive episode and melancholia items were reasonable, but some were low. The low reliabilities could be improved by redefinition of the items to reduce ambiguity and by development of a SCID glossary.

摘要

使用《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版(DSM - III)的结构化临床访谈(SCID)、纽卡斯尔内源性/反应性指数、范伯格 - 卡罗尔判别指数和汉密尔顿抑郁量表对70名抑郁症患者进行评估,以确定有和没有内源性/忧郁性抑郁症的患者在症状结构和严重程度上的异同。根据DSM - III,所有患有忧郁症的患者按照研究诊断标准(RDC)都患有明确的内源性重度抑郁症,但在35名RDC明确诊断为内源性抑郁症的患者中,只有20名符合DSM - III的忧郁症诊断。明确的内源性抑郁症患者与可能的或非内源性抑郁症患者之间的症状模式差异,比忧郁性和非忧郁性明确内源性抑郁症患者之间的差异更大。有效界定一个疾病分类的前提是诊断标准具有良好的可靠性。通过对9名患者(5名患有重度抑郁症)的访谈录音进行SCID评分,本研究中的8名评分者得出的kappa系数为0.79,这表明使用结构化访谈可以提高DSM - III诊断的可靠性。大多数DSM - III重度抑郁发作和忧郁症单项的评分者间信度是合理的,但有些较低。通过重新定义项目以减少模糊性以及编制SCID术语表,可以提高低信度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验