Suppr超能文献

使用《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版结构化临床访谈对重度抑郁症和广泛性焦虑症进行《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版诊断的可靠性。

Reliability of DSM-III diagnoses for major depression and generalized anxiety disorder using the structured clinical interview for DSM-III.

作者信息

Riskind J H, Beck A T, Berchick R J, Brown G, Steer R A

出版信息

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1987 Sep;44(9):817-20. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1987.01800210065010.

Abstract

This study examined the interrater reliability of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) and major depressive disorder (MDD) diagnoses derived from the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III (SCID). Using videotaped interviews, paired raters made independent diagnoses of 75 psychiatric outpatients. The percent agreement of the raters was 82% for MDD and 86% for GAD; the respective kappa values were .72 and .79. The results indicated that the SCID can be employed reliably to differentiate MDD from GAD. The SCID is recommended for further research with these disorders.

摘要

本研究考察了源自《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第三版》(DSM-III)结构化临床访谈(SCID)的广泛性焦虑障碍(GAD)和重度抑郁症(MDD)诊断的评分者间信度。通过录像访谈,配对评分者对75名精神科门诊患者进行了独立诊断。评分者对MDD的一致性百分比为82%,对GAD为86%;各自的kappa值分别为0.72和0.79。结果表明,SCID可可靠地用于区分MDD和GAD。建议将SCID用于对这些疾病的进一步研究。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验