Suppr超能文献

使用《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版结构化临床访谈对重度抑郁症和广泛性焦虑症进行《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版诊断的可靠性。

Reliability of DSM-III diagnoses for major depression and generalized anxiety disorder using the structured clinical interview for DSM-III.

作者信息

Riskind J H, Beck A T, Berchick R J, Brown G, Steer R A

出版信息

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1987 Sep;44(9):817-20. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1987.01800210065010.

Abstract

This study examined the interrater reliability of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) and major depressive disorder (MDD) diagnoses derived from the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III (SCID). Using videotaped interviews, paired raters made independent diagnoses of 75 psychiatric outpatients. The percent agreement of the raters was 82% for MDD and 86% for GAD; the respective kappa values were .72 and .79. The results indicated that the SCID can be employed reliably to differentiate MDD from GAD. The SCID is recommended for further research with these disorders.

摘要

本研究考察了源自《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第三版》(DSM-III)结构化临床访谈(SCID)的广泛性焦虑障碍(GAD)和重度抑郁症(MDD)诊断的评分者间信度。通过录像访谈,配对评分者对75名精神科门诊患者进行了独立诊断。评分者对MDD的一致性百分比为82%,对GAD为86%;各自的kappa值分别为0.72和0.79。结果表明,SCID可可靠地用于区分MDD和GAD。建议将SCID用于对这些疾病的进一步研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验