Fistula Research Unit, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, London, UK.
Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, St Mary's Hospital, London, UK.
Gut. 2019 Feb;68(2):226-238. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-315503. Epub 2018 Feb 3.
Lack of standardised outcomes hampers effective analysis and comparison of data when comparing treatments in fistulising perianal Crohn's disease (pCD). Development of a standardised set of outcomes would resolve these issues. This study provides the definitive core outcome set (COS) for fistulising pCD.
Candidate outcomes were generated through a systematic review and patient interviews. Consensus was established via a three-round Delphi process using a 9-point Likert scale based on how important they felt it was in determining treatment success culminating in a final consensus meeting. Stakeholders were recruited nationally and grouped into three panels (surgeons and radiologists, gastroenterologists and IBD specialist nurses, and patients). Participants received feedback from (in the second round) and (in the third round) to allow refinement of their scores.
A total of 295 outcomes were identified from systematic reviews and interviews that were categorised into 92 domains. 187 stakeholders (response rate 78.5%) prioritised 49 outcomes through a three-round Delphi study. The final consensus meeting of 41 experts and patients generated agreement on an eight domain COS. The COS comprised three patient-reported outcome domains (quality of life, incontinence and a combined score of patient priorities) and five clinician-reported outcome domains (perianal disease activity, development of new perianal abscess/sepsis, new/recurrent fistula, unplanned surgery and faecal diversion).
A fistulising pCD COS has been produced by all key stakeholders. Application of the COS will reduce heterogeneity in outcome reporting, thereby facilitating more meaningful comparisons between treatments, data synthesis and ultimately benefit patient care.
在比较肛旁克罗恩病(pCD)的治疗方法时,缺乏标准化的结局会阻碍对数据的有效分析和比较。制定一套标准化的结局将解决这些问题。本研究提供了肛旁克罗恩病的标准化结局集(COS)。
候选结局通过系统评价和患者访谈产生。通过三轮 9 分 Likert 量表的 Delphi 过程达成共识,参与者根据其对确定治疗成功的重要性进行评分,最终达成共识会议。利益相关者在全国范围内招募,并分为三组(外科医生和放射科医生、胃肠病学家和 IBD 专科护士以及患者)。参与者在前两轮和第三轮中收到反馈,以允许他们调整评分。
从系统评价和访谈中确定了 295 个结局,将其分类为 92 个领域。187 名利益相关者(回应率为 78.5%)通过三轮 Delphi 研究对 49 个结局进行了优先排序。41 名专家和患者的最终共识会议就 8 个领域的 COS 达成了一致。COS 包括三个患者报告的结局领域(生活质量、失禁和患者优先事项的综合评分)和五个临床医生报告的结局领域(肛周疾病活动度、新发肛周脓肿/败血症、新发/复发性瘘管、计划外手术和粪便转流)。
所有关键利益相关者都制定了肛旁 pCD 的 COS。COS 的应用将减少结局报告的异质性,从而促进治疗方法之间更有意义的比较、数据综合,并最终有益于患者护理。