Suppr超能文献

自底向上和自顶向下因素对大规模注意网络中的刺激表现有不同影响。

Bottom-Up and Top-Down Factors Differentially Influence Stimulus Representations Across Large-Scale Attentional Networks.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon 97402

出版信息

J Neurosci. 2018 Mar 7;38(10):2495-2504. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2724-17.2018. Epub 2018 Feb 2.

Abstract

Visual attention is thought to be supported by three large-scale frontoparietal networks: the frontoparietal control network (FPCN), the dorsal attention network (DAN), and the ventral attention network (VAN). The traditional view is that these networks support visual attention by biasing and evaluating sensory representations in visual cortical regions. However, recent evidence suggests that frontoparietal regions actively represent perceptual stimuli. Here, we assessed how perceptual stimuli are represented across large-scale frontoparietal and visual networks. Specifically, we tested whether representations of stimulus features across these networks are differentially sensitive to bottom-up and top-down factors. In a pair of pattern-based fMRI studies, male and female human subjects made perceptual decisions about face images that varied along two independent dimensions: gender and affect. Across studies, we interrupted bottom-up visual input using backward masks. Within studies, we manipulated which stimulus features were goal relevant (i.e., whether gender or affect was relevant) and task switching (i.e., whether the goal on the current trial matched the goal on the prior trial). We found that stimulus features could be reliably decoded from all four networks and, importantly, that subregions within each attentional network maintained coherent representations. Critically, the different attentional manipulations (interruption, goal relevance, and task switching) differentially influenced feature representations across networks. Whereas visual interruption had a relatively greater influence on representations in visual regions, goal relevance and task switching had a relatively greater influence on representations in frontoparietal networks. Therefore, large-scale brain networks can be dissociated according to how attention influences the feature representations that they maintain. Visual attention is supported by multiple frontoparietal attentional networks. However, it remains unclear how stimulus features are represented within these networks and how they are influenced by attention. Here, we assessed feature representations in four large-scale networks using a perceptual decision-making paradigm in which we manipulated top-down and bottom-up factors. We found that top-down manipulations such as goal relevance and task switching modulated feature representations in attentional networks, whereas bottom-up manipulations such as interruption of visual processing had a relatively stronger influence on feature representations in visual regions. Together, these findings indicate that attentional networks actively represent stimulus features and that representations within different large-scale networks are influenced by different forms of attention.

摘要

视觉注意力被认为是由三个大规模的额顶网络支持的

额顶控制网络(FPCN)、背侧注意网络(DAN)和腹侧注意网络(VAN)。传统观点认为,这些网络通过偏向和评估视觉皮层区域的感觉表示来支持视觉注意力。然而,最近的证据表明,额顶区域主动表示感知刺激。在这里,我们评估了感知刺激是如何在大规模额顶和视觉网络中表示的。具体来说,我们测试了这些网络中的刺激特征表示是否对自上而下和自下而上的因素有不同的敏感性。在两项基于模式的 fMRI 研究中,男性和女性人类受试者对沿两个独立维度(性别和情感)变化的面孔图像做出了感知决策。在两项研究中,我们使用后向掩蔽来中断下传的视觉输入。在每项研究中,我们操纵哪些刺激特征是目标相关的(即性别或情感是否相关)以及任务转换(即当前试验的目标是否与前一试验的目标匹配)。我们发现,可以从所有四个网络中可靠地解码出刺激特征,重要的是,每个注意力网络的子区域都保持着连贯的表示。关键是,不同的注意力操作(中断、目标相关性和任务转换)在网络之间对特征表示产生了不同的影响。虽然视觉中断对视觉区域的表示有相对较大的影响,但目标相关性和任务转换对额顶网络的表示有相对较大的影响。因此,可以根据注意力对它们保持的特征表示的影响来区分大规模脑网络。视觉注意力是由多个额顶注意力网络支持的。然而,目前尚不清楚刺激特征在这些网络中是如何表示的,以及它们是如何受到注意力的影响的。在这里,我们使用一个感知决策任务范式来评估四个大规模网络中的特征表示,在该范式中,我们操纵了自上而下和自下而上的因素。我们发现,自上而下的操作,如目标相关性和任务转换,调节了注意力网络中的特征表示,而自下而上的操作,如视觉处理的中断,对视觉区域的特征表示有相对较大的影响。总的来说,这些发现表明注意力网络主动表示刺激特征,并且不同的大规模网络中的表示受到不同形式的注意力的影响。

相似文献

1
Bottom-Up and Top-Down Factors Differentially Influence Stimulus Representations Across Large-Scale Attentional Networks.
J Neurosci. 2018 Mar 7;38(10):2495-2504. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2724-17.2018. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
2
Feature-Selective Attentional Modulations in Human Frontoparietal Cortex.
J Neurosci. 2016 Aug 3;36(31):8188-99. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3935-15.2016.
3
Biased Neural Representation of Feature-Based Attention in the Human Frontoparietal Network.
J Neurosci. 2020 Oct 21;40(43):8386-8395. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0690-20.2020. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
4
Parietal Representations of Stimulus Features Are Amplified during Memory Retrieval and Flexibly Aligned with Top-Down Goals.
J Neurosci. 2018 Sep 5;38(36):7809-7821. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0564-18.2018. Epub 2018 Jul 27.
6
Selecting category specific visual information: Top-down and bottom-up control of object based attention.
Conscious Cogn. 2015 Sep;35:330-41. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2015.02.006. Epub 2015 Feb 28.
7
Frontoparietal activation during visual conjunction search: Effects of bottom-up guidance and adult age.
Hum Brain Mapp. 2017 Apr;38(4):2128-2149. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23509. Epub 2017 Jan 4.
8
Auditory and visual connectivity gradients in frontoparietal cortex.
Hum Brain Mapp. 2017 Jan;38(1):255-270. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23358. Epub 2016 Aug 29.
9
Dynamic Trial-by-Trial Recoding of Task-Set Representations in the Frontoparietal Cortex Mediates Behavioral Flexibility.
J Neurosci. 2017 Nov 8;37(45):11037-11050. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0935-17.2017. Epub 2017 Oct 2.
10
Continuous and discrete representations of feature-based attentional priority in human frontoparietal network.
Cogn Neurosci. 2020 Jan;11(1-2):47-59. doi: 10.1080/17588928.2019.1601074. Epub 2019 Apr 24.

引用本文的文献

2
Unveiling the Role of Theory of Mind: Neural Response to Emotional Stimuli in Context.
Affect Sci. 2025 Feb 26;6(2):340-355. doi: 10.1007/s42761-025-00293-1. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Neural circuit basis of pathological anxiety.
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2025 Jan;26(1):5-22. doi: 10.1038/s41583-024-00880-4. Epub 2024 Nov 27.
4
The neural basis of attentional selection in goal-directed memory retrieval.
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 9;14(1):20937. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-71691-x.
5
Controllability in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder brains.
Cogn Neurodyn. 2024 Aug;18(4):2003-2013. doi: 10.1007/s11571-023-10063-z. Epub 2024 Feb 6.
6
Top-Down Task Goals Induce the Retrieval State.
J Neurosci. 2024 Jul 31;44(31):e0452242024. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0452-24.2024.
9
The intersection of the retrieval state and internal attention.
Nat Commun. 2023 Jun 29;14(1):3861. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-39609-9.
10
A review of visual sustained attention: neural mechanisms and computational models.
PeerJ. 2023 Jun 13;11:e15351. doi: 10.7717/peerj.15351. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Dynamic Trial-by-Trial Recoding of Task-Set Representations in the Frontoparietal Cortex Mediates Behavioral Flexibility.
J Neurosci. 2017 Nov 8;37(45):11037-11050. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0935-17.2017. Epub 2017 Oct 2.
2
Reevaluating the Sensory Account of Visual Working Memory Storage.
Trends Cogn Sci. 2017 Oct;21(10):794-815. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2017.06.013. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
3
Switch-Independent Task Representations in Frontal and Parietal Cortex.
J Neurosci. 2017 Aug 16;37(33):8033-8042. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3656-16.2017. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
4
Attention to Distinct Goal-relevant Features Differentially Guides Semantic Knowledge Retrieval.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2017 Jul;29(7):1178-1193. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01121. Epub 2017 Mar 15.
5
The contribution of the human posterior parietal cortex to episodic memory.
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2017 Feb 17;18(3):183-192. doi: 10.1038/nrn.2017.6.
6
Distributed representation of context by intrinsic subnetworks in prefrontal cortex.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Feb 21;114(8):2030-2035. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1615269114. Epub 2017 Feb 7.
8
Hippocampal Mismatch Signals Are Modulated by the Strength of Neural Predictions and Their Similarity to Outcomes.
J Neurosci. 2016 Dec 14;36(50):12677-12687. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1850-16.2016. Epub 2016 Nov 7.
9
Feature-Selective Attentional Modulations in Human Frontoparietal Cortex.
J Neurosci. 2016 Aug 3;36(31):8188-99. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3935-15.2016.
10
Reconstructing Perceived and Retrieved Faces from Activity Patterns in Lateral Parietal Cortex.
J Neurosci. 2016 Jun 1;36(22):6069-82. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4286-15.2016.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验