Loose Lasse S, Wisniewski David, Rusconi Marco, Goschke Thomas, Haynes John-Dylan
Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Berlin and Berlin Center for Advanced Neuroimaging, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10115 Berlin, Germany,
Department of Psychology and Collaborative Research Center Volition and Cognitive Control, Technische Universität Dresden, 01069 Dresden, Germany.
J Neurosci. 2017 Aug 16;37(33):8033-8042. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3656-16.2017. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
Alternating between two tasks is effortful and impairs performance. Previous fMRI studies have found increased activity in frontoparietal cortex when task switching is required. One possibility is that the additional control demands for switch trials are met by strengthening task representations in the human brain. Alternatively, on switch trials, the residual representation of the previous task might impede the buildup of a neural task representation. This would predict weaker task representations on switch trials, thus also explaining the performance costs. To test this, male and female participants were cued to perform one of two similar tasks, with the task being repeated or switched between successive trials. Multivoxel pattern analysis was used to test which regions encode the tasks and whether this encoding differs between switch and repeat trials. As expected, we found information about task representations in frontal and parietal cortex, but there was no difference in the decoding accuracy of task-related information between switch and repeat trials. Using cross-classification, we found that the frontoparietal cortex encodes tasks using a generalizable spatial pattern in switch and repeat trials. Therefore, task representations in frontal and parietal cortex are largely switch independent. We found no evidence that neural information about task representations in these regions can explain behavioral costs usually associated with task switching. Alternating between two tasks is effortful and slows down performance. One possible explanation is that the representations in the human brain need time to build up and are thus weaker on switch trials, explaining performance costs. Alternatively, task representations might even be enhanced to overcome the previous task. Here, we used a combination of fMRI and a brain classifier to test whether the additional control demands under switching conditions lead to an increased or decreased strength of task representations in frontoparietal brain regions. We found that task representations are not modulated significantly by switching processes and generalize across switching conditions. Therefore, task representations in the human brain cannot account for the performance costs associated with alternating between tasks.
在两项任务之间交替是费力的,并且会损害表现。先前的功能磁共振成像(fMRI)研究发现,当需要进行任务切换时,额顶叶皮层的活动会增加。一种可能性是,通过加强人类大脑中的任务表征来满足切换试验的额外控制需求。或者,在切换试验中,先前任务的残余表征可能会阻碍神经任务表征的建立。这将预测在切换试验中任务表征较弱,从而也解释了表现成本。为了对此进行测试,男性和女性参与者被提示执行两项相似任务中的一项,任务在连续试验中重复或切换。多体素模式分析用于测试哪些区域编码任务,以及这种编码在切换试验和重复试验之间是否不同。正如预期的那样,我们在额叶和顶叶皮层中发现了有关任务表征的信息,但在切换试验和重复试验之间,与任务相关信息的解码准确性没有差异。使用交叉分类,我们发现额顶叶皮层在切换试验和重复试验中使用可推广的空间模式对任务进行编码。因此,额叶和顶叶皮层中的任务表征在很大程度上与切换无关。我们没有发现证据表明这些区域中关于任务表征的神经信息可以解释通常与任务切换相关的行为成本。在两项任务之间交替是费力的,并且会减慢表现。一种可能的解释是,人类大脑中的表征需要时间来建立,因此在切换试验中较弱,这解释了表现成本。或者,任务表征甚至可能会增强以克服先前的任务。在这里,我们结合功能磁共振成像和脑部分类器来测试切换条件下的额外控制需求是否会导致额顶叶脑区任务表征的强度增加或降低。我们发现任务表征不会被切换过程显著调节,并且在不同的切换条件下具有普遍性。因此,人类大脑中的任务表征无法解释与任务之间交替相关的表现成本。