Suppr超能文献

双链 RNA 的差异递送导致呼肠孤病毒株间干扰素调节因子 3 激活的特异性差异。

Differential Delivery of Genomic Double-Stranded RNA Causes Reovirus Strain-Specific Differences in Interferon Regulatory Factor 3 Activation.

机构信息

Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA.

Center for Microbial Pathogenesis and Host Inflammatory Responses, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA.

出版信息

J Virol. 2018 Apr 13;92(9). doi: 10.1128/JVI.01947-17. Print 2018 May 1.

Abstract

Serotype 3 (T3) reoviruses induce substantially more type 1 interferon (IFN-I) secretion than serotype 1 (T1) strains. However, the mechanisms underlying differences in IFN-I production between T1 and T3 reoviruses remain undefined. Here, we found that differences in IFN-I production between T1 and T3 reoviruses correlate with activation of interferon regulatory factor 3 (IRF3), a key transcription factor for the production of IFN-I. T3 strain rsT3D activated IRF3 more rapidly and to a greater extent than the T1 strain rsT1L, in simian virus 40 (SV40) immortalized endothelial cells (SVECs). Differences in IRF3 activation between rsT1L and rsT3D were observed in the first hours of infection and were independent of viral RNA and protein synthesis. NF-κB activation mirrored IRF3 activation, with rsT3D inducing more NF-κB activity than rsT1L. We also found that IRF3 and NF-κB are activated in a mitochondrial antiviral-signaling protein (MAVS)-dependent manner. rsT1L does not suppress IRF3 activation, as IRF3 phosphorylation could be induced in rsT1L-infected cells. Transfected rsT1L and rsT3D RNA induced IRF3 phosphorylation, indicating that genomic RNA from both strains has the capacity to activate IRF3. Finally, bypassing the normal route of reovirus entry by transfecting -generated viral cores revealed that rsT1L and rsT3D core particles induced equivalent IRF3 activation. Taken together, our findings indicate that entry-related events that occur after outer capsid disassembly, but prior to deposition of viral cores into the cytoplasm, influence the efficiency of IFN-I responses to reovirus. This work provides further insight into mechanisms by which nonenveloped viruses activate innate immune responses. Detection of viral nucleic acids by the host cell triggers type 1 interferon (IFN-I) responses, which are critical for containing and clearing viral infections. Viral RNA is sensed in the cytoplasm by cellular receptors that initiate signaling pathways, leading to the activation of interferon regulatory factor 3 (IRF3) and NF-κB, key transcription factors required for IFN-I induction. Serotype 3 (T3) reoviruses induce significantly more IFN-I than serotype 1 (T1) strains. In this work, we found that differences in IFN-I production by T1 and T3 reoviruses correlate with differential IRF3 activation. Differences in IRF3 activation are not caused by a blockade of the IRF3 activation by a T1 strain. Rather, differences in events during the late stages of viral entry determine the capacity of reovirus to activate host IFN-I responses. Together, our work provides insight into mechanisms of IFN-I induction by nonenveloped viruses.

摘要

血清型 3(T3)呼肠孤病毒比血清型 1(T1)株诱导更多的 I 型干扰素(IFN-I)分泌。然而,T1 和 T3 呼肠孤病毒在 IFN-I 产生方面的差异的机制仍未确定。在这里,我们发现 T1 和 T3 呼肠孤病毒之间 IFN-I 产生的差异与干扰素调节因子 3(IRF3)的激活相关,IRF3 是 IFN-I 产生的关键转录因子。T3 株 rsT3D 比 T1 株 rsT1L 更迅速和更强烈地激活 IRF3,在猴空泡病毒 40(SV40)永生化内皮细胞(SVEC)中。在感染的最初几个小时观察到 rsT1L 和 rsT3D 之间的 IRF3 激活差异,并且与病毒 RNA 和蛋白质合成无关。NF-κB 的激活与 IRF3 的激活相匹配,rsT3D 诱导的 NF-κB 活性比 rsT1L 更高。我们还发现,IRF3 和 NF-κB 的激活是一种依赖于线粒体抗病毒信号蛋白(MAVS)的方式。rsT1L 不会抑制 IRF3 的激活,因为可以在 rsT1L 感染的细胞中诱导 IRF3 磷酸化。转染的 rsT1L 和 rsT3D RNA 诱导了 IRF3 的磷酸化,表明两种株系的基因组 RNA 都具有激活 IRF3 的能力。最后,通过转染生成的病毒核心绕过呼肠孤病毒的正常进入途径,揭示了 rsT1L 和 rsT3D 核心颗粒诱导了等效的 IRF3 激活。总之,我们的研究结果表明,在外壳解体后但在病毒核心沉积到细胞质之前发生的与进入相关的事件,影响了宿主对呼肠孤病毒的 IFN-I 反应的效率。这项工作为非包膜病毒激活先天免疫反应的机制提供了进一步的见解。宿主细胞检测到病毒核酸会引发 I 型干扰素(IFN-I)反应,这对于控制和清除病毒感染至关重要。细胞质中的细胞受体识别病毒 RNA,启动信号通路,导致干扰素调节因子 3(IRF3)和 NF-κB 的激活,这是诱导 IFN-I 所必需的关键转录因子。血清型 3(T3)呼肠孤病毒比血清型 1(T1)株诱导更多的 IFN-I。在这项工作中,我们发现 T1 和 T3 呼肠孤病毒 IFN-I 产生的差异与 IRF3 激活的差异相关。IRF3 激活的差异不是由 T1 株引起的 IRF3 激活的阻断引起的。相反,病毒进入后期阶段的差异决定了呼肠孤病毒激活宿主 IFN-I 反应的能力。总之,我们的工作为非包膜病毒诱导 IFN-I 的机制提供了新的认识。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

3
The gamble between oncolytic virus therapy and IFN.溶瘤病毒治疗与 IFN 的博弈。
Front Immunol. 2022 Aug 25;13:971674. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.971674. eCollection 2022.
9
Cell Killing by Reovirus: Mechanisms and Consequences.细胞被呼肠孤病毒杀伤的机制与后果
Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2023;442:133-153. doi: 10.1007/82_2020_225.

本文引用的文献

5
Viral evasion of intracellular DNA and RNA sensing.病毒对细胞内DNA和RNA传感的逃避
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2016 Jun;14(6):360-73. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2016.45. Epub 2016 May 13.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验