Mai Zhi-Ming, Ho Sai-Yin, Lo Ching-Man, Wang Man-Ping, Peto Richard, Lam Tai-Hing
School of Public Health, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong S.A.R., China.
Department for International Trade, British Consulate-General, Hong Kong S.A.R., China.
Int J Epidemiol. 2018 Jun 1;47(3):752-759. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyx267.
The effects of smoking cessation might be different in different populations. Proportional mortality studies of all deaths, relating the certified cause to retrospectively determined smoking habits, have helped assess the hazards of smoking in Hong Kong, and further analyses can help assess the effects of prolonged cessation (although not of recent cessation, as life-threatening disease can itself cause cessation, particularly in old age).
The LIMOR study sought the certified causes of all deaths in 1998, and interviewed 81% of families at death registries to determine the decedent's smoking history. Cases were deaths from pre-defined diseases of interest (N = 15 356); controls were deaths from pre-defined non-smoking-related diseases (N = 5023). Case vs control odds ratios for ex-smokers vs smokers were calculated by age-, sex- and education-standardized logistic regression. These are described as mortality rate ratios (RRs), with a group-specific confidence interval (CI).
For the aggregate of all deaths from any of the diseases of interest at ages 35-69 years, the RRs for current smoking, quitting 0-4, 5-9 or 10+ years ago and never-smoking were, respectively, RR = 1 (95% CI 0.86-1.17), 0.91 (0.73-1.14), 0.71 (0.49-1.02), 0.66 (0.50-0.87) and 0.43 (0.37-0.48). Younger age of quitting (25-44 or 45-64) appeared to be associated with greater protection: RR = 0.58 (0.38-0.88) and 0.71 (0.54-0.93), respectively. These patterns were less clear at older ages, particularly for death from emphysema.
Longer durations of smoking cessation are associated with progressively lower mortality rates from the diseases of interest. For sustainable monitoring of tobacco-attributed mortality, approximate years since last smoked should be recorded during death registration.
戒烟的效果在不同人群中可能有所不同。通过比例死亡率研究,将所有死亡的认证死因与回顾性确定的吸烟习惯相关联,有助于评估香港吸烟的危害,进一步分析有助于评估长期戒烟的效果(尽管不是近期戒烟的效果,因为危及生命的疾病本身可能导致戒烟,尤其是在老年人群中)。
LIMOR研究调查了1998年所有死亡的认证死因,并在死亡登记处对81%的家庭进行了访谈,以确定死者的吸烟史。病例为死于预先定义的感兴趣疾病(N = 15356);对照为死于预先定义的与吸烟无关疾病(N = 5023)。通过年龄、性别和教育程度标准化的逻辑回归计算前吸烟者与吸烟者的病例对照比值比。这些被描述为死亡率比(RRs),并带有特定组的置信区间(CI)。
对于35至69岁因任何感兴趣疾病导致的所有死亡总数,当前吸烟者、0至4年、5至9年或10年以上前戒烟者以及从不吸烟者的RRs分别为RR = 1(95% CI 0.86 - 1.17)、0.91(0.73 - 1.14)、0.71(0.49 - 1.02)、0.66(0.50 - 0.87)和0.43(0.37 - 0.48)。较年轻时戒烟(25至44岁或45至64岁)似乎与更大的保护作用相关:RR分别为0.58(0.38 - 0.88)和0.71(0.54 - 0.93)。这些模式在老年人中不太明显,尤其是对于肺气肿导致的死亡。
戒烟时间越长,因感兴趣疾病导致的死亡率逐渐降低。为了对烟草归因死亡率进行可持续监测,在死亡登记时应记录距上次吸烟的大致年数。