Radboud University, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Radboud University, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Neuroimage. 2018 Jun;173:13-24. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.02.011. Epub 2018 Feb 10.
Labels on food packages inform our beliefs, shaping our expectations of food properties, such as its expected taste and healthiness. These beliefs can influence the processing of caloric rewards beyond objective sensory properties and have the potential to impact decision making. However, no studies, within or beyond the food domain, have assessed how written information, such as food labels, affect implicit motivation to obtain rewards, even though choices in daily life might be strongly driven by implicit motivational biases. We investigated how written information affects implicit motivation to obtain caloric rewards in healthy young adults. We used food labels (high- and low-calorie), associated with an identical fruit-flavored sugar-sweetened beverage, to study motivation for caloric rewards during fMRI. In a joystick task, hungry participants (N = 31) were instructed to make fast approach or avoid movements to earn the cued beverages. Behaviorally, we found a general approach bias, which was stronger for the beverage that was most preferred during a subsequent choice test, i.e., the one labeled as low-calorie. This behavioral effect was accompanied by increased BOLD signal in the sensorimotor cortex during the response phase of the task for the preferred, low-calorie beverage compared with the non-preferred, high-calorie beverage. During the anticipation phase, the non-preferred, high-calorie beverage label elicited stronger fMRI signal in the right ventral anterior insula, a region associated with aversion and taste intensity, than the preferred, low-calorie label. Together, these data suggest that high-calorie labeling can increase avoidance of beverages and reduce neural activity in brain regions associated with motor control. In conclusion, we show effects of food labeling on fMRI responses during anticipation and subsequent motivated action and on behavior, in the absence of objective taste differences, demonstrating the influence of written information on implicit biases. These findings contribute to our understanding of implicit biases in real-life eating behavior.
食品包装上的标签会影响我们的信念,从而塑造我们对食品属性的预期,例如预期的口感和健康程度。这些信念可能会影响对热量奖励的加工,超出客观感官属性的影响,并有潜力影响决策。然而,无论是在食品领域内还是之外,都没有研究评估书面信息(如食品标签)如何影响获得奖励的内隐动机,尽管日常生活中的选择可能受到内隐动机偏差的强烈驱动。我们研究了书面信息如何影响健康年轻成年人获得热量奖励的内隐动机。我们使用与相同水果味加糖饮料相关的高卡路里和低卡路里食品标签,在 fMRI 中研究获得卡路里奖励的动机。在操纵杆任务中,饥饿的参与者(N=31)被指示快速接近或避免移动以赚取提示的饮料。行为上,我们发现了一种普遍的接近偏见,对于在后续选择测试中最受欢迎的饮料(即标签为低卡路里的饮料),这种偏见更强。这种行为效应伴随着在任务响应阶段对首选低卡路里饮料的大脑感觉运动皮层中 BOLD 信号的增加,与非首选高卡路里饮料相比。在预期阶段,与首选低卡路里标签相比,非首选高卡路里饮料标签在右侧腹侧前岛引起更强的 fMRI 信号,该区域与厌恶和味道强度有关。总的来说,这些数据表明,高热量标签可以增加对饮料的回避,并减少与运动控制相关的大脑区域的神经活动。总之,我们在没有客观味觉差异的情况下,展示了食品标签对预期和随后的动机行动期间 fMRI 反应以及行为的影响,证明了书面信息对内隐偏见的影响。这些发现有助于我们理解现实生活中饮食行为的内隐偏见。