Department of Neurology, Vanderbilt Memory & Alzheimer's Center Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Feb 13;7(4):e007562. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.007562.
Global longitudinal strain (GLS), reflecting total shortening of the myocardium during the cardiac cycle, has emerged as a more precise myocardial function measure than left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Longitudinal strain may be selectively affected in subclinical heart disease, even in the presence of normal LVEF. This study examines subclinical cardiac dysfunction, assessed by GLS and LVEF, and cognition among older adults.
Vanderbilt Memory and Aging Project participants who were free of clinical dementia, stroke, and heart failure (n=318, 73±7 years, 58% male) completed neuropsychological assessment and cardiac magnetic resonance to quantify GLS and LVEF. Linear regression models related GLS and LVEF to neuropsychological performances, adjusting for age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, Framingham Stroke Risk Profile, cognitive diagnosis, and *ε4 status. Models were repeated with a cardiac×cognitive diagnosis interaction term. Compromised GLS (reflected by higher values) related to worse naming (β=-0.07, =0.04), visuospatial immediate recall (β=-0.83, =0.03), visuospatial delayed recall (β=-0.22, =0.03), and verbal delayed recall (β=-0.11, =0.007). LVEF did not relate to worse performance on any measure (>0.18). No diagnostic interactions were observed.
Our study results are among the first to suggest that compromised GLS relates to worse episodic memory and language performance among older adults who are free of clinical dementia, stroke, and heart failure. Subclinical cardiac dysfunction may correlate with cognitive health in late life, even when LVEF remains normal. The results add to growing evidence that GLS may be a more sensitive and preferred method for quantifying subclinical changes in cardiac function.
全球纵向应变(GLS)反映了心肌在心动周期中的总缩短程度,比左心室射血分数(LVEF)更能准确地反映心肌功能。即使在 LVEF 正常的情况下,纵向应变也可能在亚临床心脏病中受到选择性影响。本研究探讨了 LVEF 正常的老年人群中,由 GLS 和 LVEF 评估的亚临床心脏功能障碍与认知之间的关系。
无临床痴呆、中风和心力衰竭的范德比尔特记忆与衰老项目参与者(n=318,73±7 岁,58%为男性)完成了神经心理学评估和心脏磁共振检查,以量化 GLS 和 LVEF。线性回归模型将 GLS 和 LVEF 与神经心理学表现相关联,调整了年龄、性别、种族/民族、教育程度、弗雷明汉中风风险评分、认知诊断和 *ε4 状态。模型中重复了心脏与认知诊断的交互项。受损的 GLS(反映为较高的值)与较差的命名(β=-0.07,=0.04)、视觉空间即时回忆(β=-0.83,=0.03)、视觉空间延迟回忆(β=-0.22,=0.03)和语言延迟回忆(β=-0.11,=0.007)相关。LVEF 与任何指标上的表现下降均无关(>0.18)。未观察到诊断性交互作用。
我们的研究结果是首批表明,在无临床痴呆、中风和心力衰竭的老年人群中,受损的 GLS 与记忆和语言等认知表现下降有关。即使 LVEF 保持正常,亚临床心脏功能障碍也可能与晚年的认知健康相关。这些结果增加了越来越多的证据表明,GLS 可能是一种更敏感和首选的方法,用于量化心脏功能的亚临床变化。