• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Measurement of health system performance at district level: A study protocol.地区层面卫生系统绩效评估:一项研究方案。
J Public Health Res. 2018 Jan 2;6(3):917. doi: 10.4081/jphr.2017.917. eCollection 2017 Dec 13.
2
Comprehensive measurement of health system performance at district level in India: Generation of a composite index.印度地区级卫生系统绩效的综合衡量:综合指数的生成。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2019 Oct;34(4):e1783-e1799. doi: 10.1002/hpm.2895. Epub 2019 Aug 19.
3
A composite indicator to measure universal health care coverage in India: way forward for post-2015 health system performance monitoring framework.衡量印度全民医保覆盖情况的综合指标:2015年后卫生系统绩效监测框架的前进方向
Health Policy Plan. 2017 Feb;32(1):43-56. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czw097. Epub 2016 Aug 6.
4
What should the government do regarding health policy-making to develop community health care in Shanghai?政府应该在制定健康政策方面采取哪些措施来发展上海的社区卫生保健?
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2011 Oct-Dec;26(4):379-435. doi: 10.1002/hpm.1117.
5
A health system framework for perinatal care in South African district hospitals: a Delphi technique.南非地区医院围产期保健的卫生系统框架:德尔菲技术。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jun 20;19(1):402. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4200-4.
6
Improving quality of care for pregnancy, perinatal and newborn care at district and sub-district public health facilities in three districts of Haryana, India: An Implementation study.改善印度哈里亚纳邦三个地区的区和分区公共卫生设施的妊娠、围产期和新生儿护理的护理质量:一项实施研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 23;16(7):e0254781. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254781. eCollection 2021.
7
Block-wise comprehensive health index in Gadchiroli: A tribal district in Maharashtra.马哈拉施特拉邦加奇罗利的区块综合健康指数:一个部落地区。
Indian J Public Health. 2018 Apr-Jun;62(2):75-81. doi: 10.4103/ijph.IJPH_247_16.
8
[Efficiency versus quality in the NHS, in Portugal: methodologies for evaluation].葡萄牙国民医疗服务体系中的效率与质量:评估方法
Acta Med Port. 2008 Sep-Oct;21(5):397-410. Epub 2009 Jan 16.
9
Improving quality of care for perinatal and newborn care at district and subdistrict hospitals in Haryana, India: Implementation research protocol.提高印度哈里亚纳邦区和分区医院围产期和新生儿护理质量:实施研究方案。
J Adv Nurs. 2018 Dec;74(12):2904-2911. doi: 10.1111/jan.13791. Epub 2018 Aug 29.
10

引用本文的文献

1
From Theory to Practice: Viewpoint on Economic Indicators for Trust in Digital Health.从理论到实践:关于数字健康信任度经济指标的观点
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jan 15;27:e59111. doi: 10.2196/59111.
2
Health System Governance Evaluation: A Scoping Review.卫生系统治理评估:一项范围综述
Iran J Public Health. 2023 Feb;52(2):265-277. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v52i2.11880.
3
Evaluating Healthcare Performance in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Pilot Study on Selected Settings in Ethiopia, Tanzania, and Uganda.评估中低收入国家的医疗保健绩效:在埃塞俄比亚、坦桑尼亚和乌干达的选定环境中的试点研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 20;20(1):41. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010041.
4
Framework for assessing the performance of the Ghanaian health system: study protocol.评估加纳卫生系统绩效的框架:研究方案。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2021 Dec 20;19(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12961-021-00802-1.
5
Towards universal health coverage in the WHO African Region: assessing health system functionality, incorporating lessons from COVID-19.迈向世卫组织非洲区域全民健康覆盖:评估卫生系统功能,吸取新冠疫情教训。
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Mar;6(3). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004618.

本文引用的文献

1
Institutionalising health technology assessment: establishing the Medical Technology Assessment Board in India.将卫生技术评估制度化:在印度设立医疗技术评估委员会。
BMJ Glob Health. 2017 Jun 26;2(2):e000259. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2016-000259. eCollection 2017.
2
Measuring the health-related Sustainable Development Goals in 188 countries: a baseline analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015.衡量188个国家与健康相关的可持续发展目标:来自《2015年全球疾病负担研究》的基线分析
Lancet. 2016 Oct 8;388(10053):1813-1850. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31467-2. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
3
A composite indicator to measure universal health care coverage in India: way forward for post-2015 health system performance monitoring framework.衡量印度全民医保覆盖情况的综合指标:2015年后卫生系统绩效监测框架的前进方向
Health Policy Plan. 2017 Feb;32(1):43-56. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czw097. Epub 2016 Aug 6.
4
Coverage and Financial Risk Protection for Institutional Delivery: How Universal Is Provision of Maternal Health Care in India?机构分娩的覆盖范围与经济风险保护:印度孕产妇保健服务的普及程度如何?
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 8;10(9):e0137315. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137315. eCollection 2015.
5
Making governance work in the health care sector: evidence from a 'natural experiment' in Italy.让治理在医疗保健领域发挥作用:来自意大利一项“自然实验”的证据。
Health Econ Policy Law. 2016 Jan;11(1):17-38. doi: 10.1017/S1744133115000067. Epub 2015 Mar 30.
6
The journey toward high performance and excellent quality.通往高性能和卓越品质的征程。
Healthc Q. 2012;15 Spec No:6-9. doi: 10.12927/hcq.2012.23152.
7
Measuring the health systems impact of disease control programmes: a critical reflection on the WHO building blocks framework.衡量疾病控制规划对卫生系统的影响:对世界卫生组织基本要素框架的批判性反思
BMC Public Health. 2014 Mar 25;14:278. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-278.
8
Health systems performance assessment in low-income countries: learning from international experiences.低收入国家的卫生系统绩效评估:国际经验学习。
Global Health. 2014 Feb 13;10:5. doi: 10.1186/1744-8603-10-5.
9
Is variation management included in regional healthcare governance systems? Some proposals from Italy.区域医疗治理体系中包含变异管理吗?来自意大利的一些提议。
Health Policy. 2014 Jan;114(1):71-8. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.08.003. Epub 2013 Aug 23.
10
The equity lens in the health care performance evaluation system.医疗保健绩效评估体系中的公平视角
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2014 Jul-Sep;29(3):e233-46. doi: 10.1002/hpm.2195. Epub 2013 May 30.

地区层面卫生系统绩效评估:一项研究方案。

Measurement of health system performance at district level: A study protocol.

作者信息

Sharma Atul, Prinja Shankar, Aggarwal Arun Kumar

机构信息

School of Public Health, Post-graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.

出版信息

J Public Health Res. 2018 Jan 2;6(3):917. doi: 10.4081/jphr.2017.917. eCollection 2017 Dec 13.

DOI:10.4081/jphr.2017.917
PMID:29441330
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5806037/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Limited efforts have been observed in low and middle income countries to undertake health system performance assessment at district level. Absence of a comprehensive data collection tool and lack of a standardised single summary measure defining overall performance are some of the main problems. Present study has been undertaken to develop a summary composite health system performance index at district level.

METHODS

A broad range of indicators covering all six domains as per building block framework were finalized by an expert panel. The domains were classified into twenty sub-domains, with 70 input and process indicators to measure performance. Seven sub-domains for assessing health system outputs and outcomes were identified, with a total of 28 indicators. Districts in Haryana state from north India were selected for the study. Primary and secondary data will be collected from 378 health facilities, district and state health directorate headquarters. Indicators will be normalized, aggregated to generate composite performance index at district level. Domain specific scores will present the quality of individual building block domains in the public health system. Robustness of the results will be checked using sensitivity analysis.

EXPECTED IMPACT FOR PUBLIC HEALTH

The study presents a methodology for comprehensive assessment of all health system domains on basis of input, process, output and outcome indicators which has never been reported from India. Generation of this index will help identify policy and implementation areas of concern and point towards potential solutions. Results may also help understand relationships between individual building blocks and their sub-components.

摘要

背景

在低收入和中等收入国家,在地区层面开展卫生系统绩效评估的工作力度有限。缺乏综合数据收集工具以及缺乏定义整体绩效的标准化单一汇总指标是一些主要问题。本研究旨在制定地区层面的综合卫生系统绩效汇总指数。

方法

一个专家小组最终确定了涵盖根据构建模块框架划分的所有六个领域的广泛指标。这些领域被分为20个子领域,有70个投入和过程指标来衡量绩效。确定了7个用于评估卫生系统产出和结果的子领域,共有28个指标。选取了印度北部哈里亚纳邦的地区进行研究。将从378个卫生设施、地区和邦卫生部门总部收集初级和二级数据。指标将进行标准化处理并汇总,以生成地区层面的综合绩效指数。特定领域得分将呈现公共卫生系统中各个构建模块领域的质量。将使用敏感性分析来检验结果的稳健性。

对公共卫生的预期影响

该研究提出了一种基于投入、过程、产出和结果指标对所有卫生系统领域进行综合评估的方法,这在印度从未有过报道。生成这个指数将有助于确定需要关注的政策和实施领域,并指出潜在的解决方案。结果还可能有助于理解各个构建模块及其子组件之间的关系。