Suppr超能文献

地区层面卫生系统绩效评估:一项研究方案。

Measurement of health system performance at district level: A study protocol.

作者信息

Sharma Atul, Prinja Shankar, Aggarwal Arun Kumar

机构信息

School of Public Health, Post-graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.

出版信息

J Public Health Res. 2018 Jan 2;6(3):917. doi: 10.4081/jphr.2017.917. eCollection 2017 Dec 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Limited efforts have been observed in low and middle income countries to undertake health system performance assessment at district level. Absence of a comprehensive data collection tool and lack of a standardised single summary measure defining overall performance are some of the main problems. Present study has been undertaken to develop a summary composite health system performance index at district level.

METHODS

A broad range of indicators covering all six domains as per building block framework were finalized by an expert panel. The domains were classified into twenty sub-domains, with 70 input and process indicators to measure performance. Seven sub-domains for assessing health system outputs and outcomes were identified, with a total of 28 indicators. Districts in Haryana state from north India were selected for the study. Primary and secondary data will be collected from 378 health facilities, district and state health directorate headquarters. Indicators will be normalized, aggregated to generate composite performance index at district level. Domain specific scores will present the quality of individual building block domains in the public health system. Robustness of the results will be checked using sensitivity analysis.

EXPECTED IMPACT FOR PUBLIC HEALTH

The study presents a methodology for comprehensive assessment of all health system domains on basis of input, process, output and outcome indicators which has never been reported from India. Generation of this index will help identify policy and implementation areas of concern and point towards potential solutions. Results may also help understand relationships between individual building blocks and their sub-components.

摘要

背景

在低收入和中等收入国家,在地区层面开展卫生系统绩效评估的工作力度有限。缺乏综合数据收集工具以及缺乏定义整体绩效的标准化单一汇总指标是一些主要问题。本研究旨在制定地区层面的综合卫生系统绩效汇总指数。

方法

一个专家小组最终确定了涵盖根据构建模块框架划分的所有六个领域的广泛指标。这些领域被分为20个子领域,有70个投入和过程指标来衡量绩效。确定了7个用于评估卫生系统产出和结果的子领域,共有28个指标。选取了印度北部哈里亚纳邦的地区进行研究。将从378个卫生设施、地区和邦卫生部门总部收集初级和二级数据。指标将进行标准化处理并汇总,以生成地区层面的综合绩效指数。特定领域得分将呈现公共卫生系统中各个构建模块领域的质量。将使用敏感性分析来检验结果的稳健性。

对公共卫生的预期影响

该研究提出了一种基于投入、过程、产出和结果指标对所有卫生系统领域进行综合评估的方法,这在印度从未有过报道。生成这个指数将有助于确定需要关注的政策和实施领域,并指出潜在的解决方案。结果还可能有助于理解各个构建模块及其子组件之间的关系。

相似文献

1
Measurement of health system performance at district level: A study protocol.
J Public Health Res. 2018 Jan 2;6(3):917. doi: 10.4081/jphr.2017.917. eCollection 2017 Dec 13.
2
Comprehensive measurement of health system performance at district level in India: Generation of a composite index.
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2019 Oct;34(4):e1783-e1799. doi: 10.1002/hpm.2895. Epub 2019 Aug 19.
4
What should the government do regarding health policy-making to develop community health care in Shanghai?
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2011 Oct-Dec;26(4):379-435. doi: 10.1002/hpm.1117.
5
A health system framework for perinatal care in South African district hospitals: a Delphi technique.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jun 20;19(1):402. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4200-4.
7
Block-wise comprehensive health index in Gadchiroli: A tribal district in Maharashtra.
Indian J Public Health. 2018 Apr-Jun;62(2):75-81. doi: 10.4103/ijph.IJPH_247_16.
8
[Efficiency versus quality in the NHS, in Portugal: methodologies for evaluation].
Acta Med Port. 2008 Sep-Oct;21(5):397-410. Epub 2009 Jan 16.
10

引用本文的文献

1
From Theory to Practice: Viewpoint on Economic Indicators for Trust in Digital Health.
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jan 15;27:e59111. doi: 10.2196/59111.
2
Health System Governance Evaluation: A Scoping Review.
Iran J Public Health. 2023 Feb;52(2):265-277. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v52i2.11880.
4
Framework for assessing the performance of the Ghanaian health system: study protocol.
Health Res Policy Syst. 2021 Dec 20;19(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12961-021-00802-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Institutionalising health technology assessment: establishing the Medical Technology Assessment Board in India.
BMJ Glob Health. 2017 Jun 26;2(2):e000259. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2016-000259. eCollection 2017.
2
4
Coverage and Financial Risk Protection for Institutional Delivery: How Universal Is Provision of Maternal Health Care in India?
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 8;10(9):e0137315. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137315. eCollection 2015.
5
Making governance work in the health care sector: evidence from a 'natural experiment' in Italy.
Health Econ Policy Law. 2016 Jan;11(1):17-38. doi: 10.1017/S1744133115000067. Epub 2015 Mar 30.
6
The journey toward high performance and excellent quality.
Healthc Q. 2012;15 Spec No:6-9. doi: 10.12927/hcq.2012.23152.
9
Is variation management included in regional healthcare governance systems? Some proposals from Italy.
Health Policy. 2014 Jan;114(1):71-8. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.08.003. Epub 2013 Aug 23.
10
The equity lens in the health care performance evaluation system.
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2014 Jul-Sep;29(3):e233-46. doi: 10.1002/hpm.2195. Epub 2013 May 30.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验