• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

日本质子治疗前列腺癌的长期结果:日本放射肿瘤学研究组的一项多机构调查。

Long-term outcomes of proton therapy for prostate cancer in Japan: a multi-institutional survey of the Japanese Radiation Oncology Study Group.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Nagoya Proton Therapy Center, Nagoya City West Medical Center, Nagoya, Japan.

Department of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.

出版信息

Cancer Med. 2018 Mar;7(3):677-689. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1350. Epub 2018 Feb 14.

DOI:10.1002/cam4.1350
PMID:29441697
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5852348/
Abstract

This is the first multi-institutional retrospective survey of the long-term outcomes of proton therapy (PT) for prostate cancer in Japan. This retrospective analysis comprised prostate cancer patients treated with PT at seven centers between January 2008 and December 2011 and was approved by each Institutional Review Board. The NCCN classification was used. Biochemical relapse was based on the Phoenix definition (nadir + 2.0 ng/mL). Toxicities were evaluated with the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. There were 215, 520, and 556 patients in the low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk groups, respectively. The median follow-up period of surviving patients was 69 months (range: 7-107). Among all patients, 98.8% were treated using a conventional fractionation schedule and 1.2% with a hypofractionation schedule; 58.5% and 21.5% received neoadjuvant and adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy, respectively. The 5-year biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS) and overall survival rates in the low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk groups were 97.0%, 91.1%, and 83.1%, and 98.4%, 96.8%, and 95.2%, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, the NCCN classification was a significant prognostic factor for bRFS, but not overall survival. The incidence rates of grade 2 or more severe late gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicities were 4.1% and 4.0%, retrospectively. This retrospective analysis of a multi-institutional survey suggested that PT is effective and well-tolerated for prostate cancer. Based on this result, a multi-institutional prospective clinical trial (UMIN000025453) on PT for prostate cancer has just been initiated in order to define its role in Japan.

摘要

这是日本首次对质子治疗(PT)前列腺癌的长期结果进行的多机构回顾性调查。这项回顾性分析包括 2008 年 1 月至 2011 年 12 月期间在 7 个中心接受 PT 治疗的前列腺癌患者,并获得了每个机构审查委员会的批准。采用 NCCN 分类。生化复发基于凤凰定义(最低点+2.0ng/mL)。毒性采用通用术语标准 4.0 版进行评估。低危、中危和高危组分别有 215、520 和 556 例患者。存活患者的中位随访期为 69 个月(范围:7-107)。所有患者中,98.8%采用常规分割方案治疗,1.2%采用低分割方案治疗;58.5%和 21.5%分别接受新辅助和辅助雄激素剥夺治疗。低危、中危和高危组的 5 年生化无复发生存率(bRFS)和总生存率分别为 97.0%、91.1%和 83.1%,98.4%、96.8%和 95.2%。多因素分析显示,NCCN 分类是 bRFS 的重要预后因素,但不是总生存率。回顾性分析显示,2 级或更严重晚期胃肠道和泌尿生殖系统毒性的发生率分别为 4.1%和 4.0%。这项多机构调查的回顾性分析表明,PT 治疗前列腺癌是有效且耐受良好的。基于这一结果,一项针对前列腺癌 PT 的多机构前瞻性临床试验(UMIN000025453)刚刚启动,以确定其在日本的作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db41/5852348/b0d31a900a3f/CAM4-7-677-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db41/5852348/72ad8c8ef9c4/CAM4-7-677-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db41/5852348/0cea91953cf2/CAM4-7-677-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db41/5852348/b0d31a900a3f/CAM4-7-677-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db41/5852348/72ad8c8ef9c4/CAM4-7-677-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db41/5852348/0cea91953cf2/CAM4-7-677-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db41/5852348/b0d31a900a3f/CAM4-7-677-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Long-term outcomes of proton therapy for prostate cancer in Japan: a multi-institutional survey of the Japanese Radiation Oncology Study Group.日本质子治疗前列腺癌的长期结果:日本放射肿瘤学研究组的一项多机构调查。
Cancer Med. 2018 Mar;7(3):677-689. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1350. Epub 2018 Feb 14.
2
Nationwide multi-institutional retrospective analysis of high-dose-rate brachytherapy combined with external beam radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: An Asian Prostate HDR-BT Consortium.高剂量率近距离放射治疗联合外照射放疗治疗局限性前列腺癌的全国多机构回顾性分析:亚洲前列腺高剂量率近距离放射治疗联盟
Brachytherapy. 2017 May-Jun;16(3):503-510. doi: 10.1016/j.brachy.2017.01.006. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
3
Hypofractionated versus conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for patients with prostate cancer (HYPRO): late toxicity results from a randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial.对于前列腺癌患者,采用低分割与常规分割放射治疗(HYPRO):一项随机、非劣效性、3 期试验的晚期毒性结果。
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Apr;17(4):464-474. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00567-7. Epub 2016 Mar 9.
4
Long-term outcomes in patients treated with proton therapy for localized prostate cancer.局部前列腺癌患者接受质子治疗的长期疗效。
Cancer Med. 2017 Oct;6(10):2234-2243. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1159. Epub 2017 Sep 6.
5
Outcome and toxicity for patients treated with intensity modulated radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer.接受调强放射治疗的局限性前列腺癌患者的疗效和毒性。
J Urol. 2013 Aug;190(2):521-6. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.02.012. Epub 2013 Feb 13.
6
Favorable 10-year outcomes of image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy combined with long-term androgen deprivation for Japanese patients with nonmetastatic prostate cancer.影像引导调强放疗联合长期雄激素剥夺治疗对日本非转移性前列腺癌患者的10年良好预后
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2019 Feb;15(1):18-25. doi: 10.1111/ajco.13097. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
7
Proton Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer: Long-Term Results From a Single-Center Experience.局部前列腺癌的质子治疗:来自单中心经验的长期结果。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2021 Mar 15;109(4):964-974. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.11.007. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
8
Five-year outcomes from 3 prospective trials of image-guided proton therapy for prostate cancer.前列腺癌影像引导质子治疗的 3 项前瞻性试验 5 年结果。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Mar 1;88(3):596-602. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.11.007.
9
Prospective Phase II Trial of Once-weekly Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy for Low-risk Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate: Late Toxicities and Outcomes.前列腺低危腺癌每周一次大分割放射治疗的前瞻性II期试验:晚期毒性和结果
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2016 Jun;28(6):386-92. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2015.12.024. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
10
Hypofractionated versus conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for patients with prostate cancer (HYPRO): acute toxicity results from a randomised non-inferiority phase 3 trial.对于前列腺癌患者的低分割与常规分割放疗(HYPRO):一项随机非劣效性 3 期试验的急性毒性结果。
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Mar;16(3):274-83. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70482-6. Epub 2015 Feb 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Real-world comparative outcomes and toxicities after definitive radiotherapy using proton beam therapy versus intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer: a retrospective, single-institutional analysis.质子束治疗与调强放射治疗用于前列腺癌根治性放疗后的真实世界比较结局和毒性:一项回顾性单机构分析
J Radiat Res. 2025 Jan 22;66(1):39-51. doi: 10.1093/jrr/rrae065.
2
Moderately hypofractionated proton beam therapy for localized prostate cancer: 5-year outcomes of a phase II trial.局部前列腺癌的适度低分割质子束治疗:一项 II 期试验的 5 年结果。
J Radiat Res. 2024 May 23;65(3):402-407. doi: 10.1093/jrr/rrae026.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Five-year outcomes from a prospective trial of image-guided accelerated hypofractionated proton therapy for prostate cancer.一项关于影像引导下加速分割质子治疗前列腺癌的前瞻性试验的五年结果。
Acta Oncol. 2017 Jul;56(7):963-970. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2017.1287946. Epub 2017 Feb 22.
2
Treatment planning comparison of IMPT, VMAT and 4π radiotherapy for prostate cases.前列腺病例的调强质子治疗(IMPT)、容积旋转调强放疗(VMAT)和4π放疗的治疗计划比较
Radiat Oncol. 2017 Jan 11;12(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s13014-016-0761-0.
3
Conventional versus hypofractionated high-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: 5-year outcomes of the randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 CHHiP trial.
Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Bragg Peak Conformal FLASH in Prostate Cancer Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy.
笔形束扫描质子布拉格峰适形FLASH在前列腺癌立体定向体部放射治疗中的应用
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Feb 15;16(4):798. doi: 10.3390/cancers16040798.
4
Dosimetric Comparison Study of Proton Therapy Using Line Scanning versus Passive Scattering and Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer.使用线扫描质子治疗与被动散射质子治疗及容积调强弧形放疗对局限性前列腺癌的剂量学比较研究
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Jan 17;16(2):403. doi: 10.3390/cancers16020403.
5
Carbon-ion radiotherapy for urological cancers.碳离子放射疗法治疗泌尿系统癌症。
Int J Urol. 2022 Oct;29(10):1109-1119. doi: 10.1111/iju.14950. Epub 2022 Jun 12.
6
Patient-Reported Quality of Life Outcomes after Moderately Hypofractionated and Normofractionated Proton Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer.局限性前列腺癌患者接受中等程度低分割和常规分割质子治疗后的患者报告生活质量结果
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Jan 20;14(3):517. doi: 10.3390/cancers14030517.
7
DNA damage response in prostate cancer cells by proton microbeam irradiation.质子微束照射对前列腺癌细胞DNA损伤的反应
Transl Cancer Res. 2020 Aug;9(8):4811-4819. doi: 10.21037/tcr-19-2915.
8
Consensus Statement on Proton Therapy for Prostate Cancer.前列腺癌质子治疗共识声明
Int J Part Ther. 2021 Apr 12;8(2):1-16. doi: 10.14338/IJPT-20-00031.1. eCollection 2021 Fall.
9
Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Proton and Carbon Ion Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.质子和碳离子放疗治疗前列腺癌的临床疗效与安全性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Oncol. 2021 Oct 12;11:709530. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.709530. eCollection 2021.
10
Proton therapy for prostate cancer: current state and future perspectives.前列腺癌的质子治疗:现状与未来展望。
Br J Radiol. 2022 Mar 1;95(1131):20210670. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20210670. Epub 2021 Sep 24.
常规分割与大分割高剂量调强放疗治疗前列腺癌:随机、非劣效性3期CHHiP试验的5年结果
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Aug;17(8):1047-1060. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30102-4. Epub 2016 Jun 20.
4
Five-Year Biochemical Results, Toxicity, and Patient-Reported Quality of Life After Delivery of Dose-Escalated Image Guided Proton Therapy for Prostate Cancer.前列腺癌剂量递增图像引导质子治疗后 5 年的生化结果、毒性和患者报告的生活质量。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 May 1;95(1):422-434. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.02.038. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
5
Spot Scanning and Passive Scattering Proton Therapy: Relative Biological Effectiveness and Oxygen Enhancement Ratio in Cultured Cells.点扫描和被动散射质子治疗:培养细胞中的相对生物效应和氧增比。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 May 1;95(1):95-102. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.01.017. Epub 2016 Jan 19.
6
A systematic review of the cost and cost-effectiveness studies of proton radiotherapy.质子放疗的成本及成本效益研究的系统评价
Cancer. 2016 May 15;122(10):1483-501. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29882. Epub 2016 Feb 1.
7
Passive proton therapy vs. IMRT planning study with focal boost for prostate cancer.被动质子治疗与调强放射治疗针对前列腺癌局部加量的计划研究
Radiat Oncol. 2015 Oct 24;10:213. doi: 10.1186/s13014-015-0522-5.
8
Proton beam therapy for the treatment of prostate cancer.质子束疗法治疗前列腺癌。
Cancer J. 2014 Nov-Dec;20(6):415-20. doi: 10.1097/PPO.0000000000000083.
9
Five-year outcomes from 3 prospective trials of image-guided proton therapy for prostate cancer.前列腺癌影像引导质子治疗的 3 项前瞻性试验 5 年结果。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Mar 1;88(3):596-602. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.11.007.
10
Comparative effectiveness study of patient-reported outcomes after proton therapy or intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer.质子治疗与调强放疗前列腺癌患者报告结局的比较效果研究。
Cancer. 2014 Apr 1;120(7):1076-82. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28536. Epub 2013 Dec 30.