• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

避免精神病学中强制手段的措施及其效果。

Measures to Avoid Coercion in Psychiatry and Their Efficacy.

机构信息

ZfP Südwürttemberg, Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie I der Universität Ulm, Weissenau.

出版信息

Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2019 May 10;116(19):336-343. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2019.0336.

DOI:10.3238/arztebl.2019.0336
PMID:31288909
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6630163/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Coercive measures such as seclusion and restraint encroach on the patient's human rights and can have serious adverse effects ranging from emotional trauma to physical injury and even death. At the same time, they may be the only way to avert acute danger for the patient and/or the hospital staff. In this article, we provide an overview of the efficacy of the measures that have been studied to date for the avoidance of coercion in psychiatry.

METHODS

This review is based on publications retrieved by a systematic search in the Medline and Cinahl databases, supplemented by a search in the reference lists of these publications. We provide a narrative synthesis in which we categorize the interventions by content.

RESULTS

Of the 84 studies included in this review, 16 had a control group; 6 of these 16 were randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The interventions were categorized by seven different types of content: organization, staff training, risk assessment, environment, psychotherapy, debriefings, and advance directives. Most interventions in each category were found to be effective in the respective studies. 38 studies investigated complex treatment programs that incorporated elements from more than one category; 37 of these (including one RCT) revealed effective reduction of the frequency of coercion. Two RCTs on the use of rating instruments to assess the risk of aggressive behavior revealed a relative reduction of the number of seclusion measures by 27% and a reduction of the cumulative duration of seclusion by 45%.

CONCLUSION

Complex intervention programs to avoid coercive measures, incorporating elements of more than one of the above categories, seem to be particularly effective. In future, cluster-randomized trials to investigate the individual categories of intervention would be desirable.

摘要

背景

约束和隔离等强制措施侵犯了患者的人权,并可能产生从情绪创伤到身体伤害甚至死亡等严重的不良后果。 同时,这些措施可能是避免患者和/或医护人员面临急性危险的唯一方法。 本文概述了迄今为止为避免精神科强制手段而进行的措施的疗效。

方法

本综述基于在 Medline 和 Cinahl 数据库中进行系统检索的出版物,并辅以对这些出版物的参考文献列表的搜索。 我们提供了一个叙述性综述,按内容对干预措施进行分类。

结果

在纳入本综述的 84 项研究中,有 16 项研究有对照组;其中 6 项为随机对照试验 (RCT)。 干预措施分为七种不同的内容:组织、员工培训、风险评估、环境、心理治疗、汇报和预先指示。 每个类别中的大多数干预措施在各自的研究中均被证明是有效的。 38 项研究调查了复杂的治疗方案,这些方案结合了一个以上类别的元素;其中 37 项(包括一项 RCT)显示出强制手段频率的有效降低。 两项关于使用评估工具评估攻击性行为风险的 RCT 显示,约束措施的数量相对减少了 27%,约束时间的累计持续时间减少了 45%。

结论

避免强制措施的复杂干预方案,结合了上述多个类别的元素,似乎特别有效。 未来,进行集群随机试验以研究干预措施的个别类别将是可取的。

相似文献

1
Measures to Avoid Coercion in Psychiatry and Their Efficacy.避免精神病学中强制手段的措施及其效果。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2019 May 10;116(19):336-343. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2019.0336.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Coercion in psychiatry: A cross-sectional study on staff views and emotions.精神病学中的强制:一项关于员工观点和情绪的横断面研究。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2021 Apr;28(2):149-162. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12643. Epub 2020 Jun 4.
4
[Post-seclusion/post-restraint debriefing with patients-overview and current situation].[与患者进行隔离/约束后情况汇报——概述与现状]
Nervenarzt. 2021 Jan;92(1):44-49. doi: 10.1007/s00115-020-00969-y.
5
Coercive Measures in Psychiatry: A Review of Ethical Arguments.精神病学中的强制手段:伦理观点综述
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Dec 14;12:790886. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.790886. eCollection 2021.
6
Reduction of coercive measures under routine conditions in psychiatric hospitals 2004-2019: Strong effects in old age psychiatry, much less in general psychiatry.2004-2019 年常规情况下精神病院强制性措施的减少:老年精神病学影响较大,一般精神病学影响较小。
Eur Psychiatry. 2020 Nov 20;63(1):e102. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2020.104.
7
Patients' attitudes towards and acceptance of coercion in psychiatry.患者对精神科强制治疗的态度和接受程度。
Psychiatry Res. 2018 Feb;260:478-485. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.12.029. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
8
Prevalence and risk factors for seclusion and restraint in old-age psychiatry inpatient units.老年精神病住院患者中约束和隔离的流行率及危险因素。
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Feb 8;21(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03095-4.
9
"Coercion Experience Scale" (CES)--validation of a questionnaire on coercive measures.“强制经验量表”(CES)——关于强制性措施的问卷验证。
BMC Psychiatry. 2010 Jan 14;10:5. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-10-5.
10
Effects of Seclusion and Restraint in Adult Psychiatry: A Systematic Review.成人精神病学中隔离与约束的影响:一项系统综述。
Front Psychiatry. 2019 Jul 16;10:491. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00491. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

1
Team Collaboration Experiences of Nurses and Physicians Working in Inpatient Psychiatry Units Related to Physical Restraint Practices: A Qualitative Study.住院精神科病房护士与医生在身体约束措施方面的团队协作经验:一项定性研究。
Florence Nightingale J Nurs. 2025 May 29;33(1):1-9. doi: 10.5152/FNJN.2025.24197.
2
Evaluating the Safe Steps for De-escalation: A protocol for a mixed concurrent control study in acute mental health units.评估降级的安全步骤:急性精神卫生病房混合并行对照研究方案
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 3;20(6):e0325558. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325558. eCollection 2025.
3
Post-incident debriefing for people with schizophrenia after coercive measures.针对精神分裂症患者采取强制手段后的事件后汇报。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 May 27;5:CD014487. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014487.pub2.
4
Staff Attitude Towards Coercive Measures in Hospital and Community Psychiatric Settings.医院和社区精神科环境中工作人员对强制手段的态度。
J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 22;14(9):2886. doi: 10.3390/jcm14092886.
5
Can primary mental health services impact levels of involuntary admissions? A cluster-RCT of the ReCoN intervention.初级心理健康服务能否影响非自愿住院的水平?一项关于ReCoN干预的整群随机对照试验。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2025 Apr 30. doi: 10.1007/s00127-025-02914-3.
6
"A pilot study of MAP - a program for handling of aggressive behaviour in psychiatric wards. An evaluation of mediating mechanisms".一项关于MAP的试点研究——一个用于处理精神科病房攻击性行为的项目。对中介机制的评估
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Apr 29;25(1):630. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07083-0.
7
Barriers and Facilitators-Lessons Learned From a Randomised Trial to Implement Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Prevention of Coercion in Psychiatry.障碍与促进因素——从一项实施精神科预防强制治疗临床实践指南的随机试验中吸取的经验教训
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2025 Feb;34(1):e70011. doi: 10.1111/inm.70011.
8
An Exploratory Study about Factors and Outcomes Associated with the Experience of Coercive Measures in Mental Health Settings.一项关于精神卫生机构中强制手段体验的相关因素及结果的探索性研究。
Psychiatr Q. 2025 Mar;96(1):133-144. doi: 10.1007/s11126-024-10110-w. Epub 2025 Jan 16.
9
Predictive accuracy of the Violence Risk Assessment Checklist for Youth in acute institutions: A prospective naturalistic multicenter study.急性机构中青少年暴力风险评估清单的预测准确性:一项前瞻性自然主义多中心研究。
Eur Psychiatry. 2025 Jan 13;68(1):e19. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.3.
10
Shared decision-making in post-coercion debriefing interventions in psychiatry - a scoping review.精神病学中强制治疗后汇报干预措施中的共同决策——一项范围综述
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Sep 27;15:1446619. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1446619. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
[The Case Register for Coercive Measures According to the Law on Assistance for Persons with Mental Diseases of Baden-Wuerttemberg: Conception and First Evaluation].[巴登-符腾堡州《精神疾病患者救助法》强制医疗措施病例登记册:构想与首次评估]
Psychiatr Prax. 2019 Mar;46(2):82-89. doi: 10.1055/a-0665-6728. Epub 2018 Aug 27.
2
Can "Model Projects of Need-Adapted Care" Reduce Involuntary Hospital Treatment and the Use of Coercive Measures?“按需护理示范项目”能否减少非自愿住院治疗及强制措施的使用?
Front Psychiatry. 2018 May 1;9:168. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00168. eCollection 2018.
3
Long-Term Impact of a Tailored Seclusion Reduction Program: Evidence for Change?个体化隔离减少计划的长期影响:有变化的证据吗?
Psychiatr Q. 2018 Sep;89(3):733-746. doi: 10.1007/s11126-018-9571-x.
4
Patient-controlled hospital admission for patients with severe mental disorders: a nationwide prospective multicentre study.患者自控住院治疗严重精神障碍患者:一项全国性前瞻性多中心研究。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2018 Apr;137(4):355-363. doi: 10.1111/acps.12868. Epub 2018 Mar 4.
5
Effects of a Staff Training Intervention on Seclusion Rates on an Adult Inpatient Psychiatric Unit.员工培训干预对成人住院精神科病房隔离率的影响。
J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv. 2018 Jun 1;56(6):23-30. doi: 10.3928/02793695-20180212-02. Epub 2018 Feb 16.
6
Long-term reduction of seclusion and forced medication on a hospital-wide level: Implementation of an open-door policy over 6 years.长期减少全院范围的隔离和强制用药:实施开放式政策超过 6 年。
Eur Psychiatry. 2018 Feb;48:51-57. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.09.008. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
7
Suicide of isolated inmates suffering from psychiatric disorders: when a preventive measure becomes punitive.患有精神疾病的独居囚犯自杀:一项预防措施何时变成了惩罚性措施。
Int J Legal Med. 2018 Jul;132(4):1225-1230. doi: 10.1007/s00414-017-1704-5. Epub 2017 Oct 19.
8
Sensory Reduction on the General Milieu of a High-Acuity Inpatient Psychiatric Unit to Prevent Use of Physical Restraints: A Successful Open Quality Improvement Trial.在高 acuity 住院精神科病房的一般环境中进行感觉减少以防止使用身体约束:一项成功的开放式质量改进试验。 (注:这里的“acuity”可能有误,推测可能是“acute”,若为“acute”则可译为“急性的、敏锐的”等,整句可译为“在急性住院精神科病房的一般环境中进行感觉减少以防止使用身体约束:一项成功的开放式质量改进试验。” )
J Am Psychiatr Nurses Assoc. 2018 Mar/Apr;24(2):133-144. doi: 10.1177/1078390317736136. Epub 2017 Oct 17.
9
Multidimensional approach to restraint minimization: The journey of a specialized mental health organization.多维方法减少约束:一家专业心理健康机构的探索之旅。
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2017 Oct;26(5):482-490. doi: 10.1111/inm.12379.
10
Outcomes of the Victorian Safewards trial in 13 wards: Impact on seclusion rates and fidelity measurement.维多利亚安全保障试验在 13 个病房的结果:对隔离率和忠实度测量的影响。
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2017 Oct;26(5):461-471. doi: 10.1111/inm.12380.