Carter Mary, Fletcher Emily, Sansom Anna, Warren Fiona C, Campbell John L
Primary Care Research Group, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK.
BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 15;8(2):e018688. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018688.
To evaluate the feasibility, acceptability and effectiveness of webGP as piloted by six general practices.
Mixed-methods evaluation, including data extraction from practice databases, general practitioner (GP) completion of case reports, patient questionnaires and staff interviews.
General practices in NHS Northern, Eastern and Western Devon Clinical Commissioning Group's area approximately 6 months after implementing webGP (February-July 2016).
Six practices provided consultations data; 20 GPs completed case reports (regarding 61 e-consults); 81 patients completed questionnaires; 5 GPs and 5 administrators were interviewed.
Attitudes and experiences of practice staff and patients regarding webGP.
WebGP uptake during the evaluation was small, showing no discernible impact on practice workload. The completeness of cross-sectional data on consultation workload varied between practices.GPs judged 41/61 (72%) of webGP requests to require a face-to-face or telephone consultation. Introducing webGP appeared to be associated with shifts in responsibility and workload between practice staff and between practices and patients.81/231 patients completed a postal survey (35.1% response rate). E-Consulters were somewhat younger and more likely to be employed than face-to-face respondents. WebGP appeared broadly acceptable to patients regarding timeliness and quality/experience of care provided. Similar problems were presented by all respondents. Both groups appeared equally familiar with other practice online services; e-consulters were somewhat more likely to have used them.From semistructured staff interviews, it appeared that, while largely acceptable within practice, introducing e-consults had potential for adverse interactions with pre-existing practice systems.
There is potential to assess the impact of new systems on consultation patterns by extracting routine data from practice databases. Staff and patients noticed subtle changes to responsibilities associated with online options. Greater uptake requires good communication between practice and patients, and organisation of systems to avoid conflicts and misuse. Further research is required to evaluate the full potential of webGP in managing practice workload.
评估由六个全科医疗诊所试点推行的网络全科医疗服务(webGP)的可行性、可接受性和有效性。
采用混合方法进行评估,包括从诊所数据库提取数据、全科医生(GP)填写病例报告、患者问卷调查以及工作人员访谈。
在英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)北德文郡、东德文郡和西德文郡临床委托小组区域内的全科医疗诊所,在推行webGP约6个月后(2016年2月至7月)。
六个诊所提供了会诊数据;20名全科医生填写了病例报告(涉及61次电子会诊);81名患者完成了问卷调查;5名全科医生和5名管理人员接受了访谈。
诊所工作人员和患者对webGP的态度和体验。
评估期间webGP的使用率较低,对诊所工作量没有明显影响。各诊所之间会诊工作量横断面数据的完整性存在差异。全科医生判断61次webGP请求中有41次(72%)需要面对面或电话会诊。引入webGP似乎与诊所工作人员之间以及诊所与患者之间的责任和工作量转移有关。81/231名患者完成了邮寄调查(回复率为35.1%)。与面对面受访者相比,电子会诊患者年龄稍小,就业可能性更大。患者对webGP提供的护理及时性和质量/体验普遍表示认可。所有受访者都提出了类似问题。两组对诊所其他在线服务的熟悉程度相当;电子会诊患者使用这些服务的可能性稍高一些。从半结构化工作人员访谈中可以看出,虽然在诊所内部基本可以接受,但引入电子会诊可能会与现有的诊所系统产生不良互动。
通过从诊所数据库提取常规数据,有可能评估新系统对会诊模式的影响。工作人员和患者注意到与在线选项相关的责任发生了细微变化。要提高使用率,需要诊所与患者之间进行良好沟通,并对系统进行组织以避免冲突和滥用。需要进一步研究以评估webGP在管理诊所工作量方面的全部潜力。