Cooper Caitlin A, Doran Timothy J, Challagulla Arjun, Tizard Mark L V, Jenkins Kristie A
CSIRO Health and Biosecurity, Australian Animal Health Laboratory, Private Bag 24, Geelong, VIC 3220 Australia.
J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2018 Feb 9;9:15. doi: 10.1186/s40104-018-0231-7. eCollection 2018.
The tools available for genome engineering have significantly improved over the last 5 years, allowing scientist to make precise edits to the genome. Along with the development of these new genome editing tools has come advancements in technologies used to deliver them. In mammals genome engineering tools are typically delivered into in vitro fertilized single cell embryos which are subsequently cultured and then implanted into a recipient animal. In avian species this is not possible, so other methods have been developed for genome engineering in birds. The most common involves in vitro culturing of primordial germ cells (PGCs), which are cells that migrate through the embryonic circulatory system to the developing gonad and colonize the gonad, eventually differentiating into the gonadocytes which produce either sperm or ova. While in culture the PGCs can be modified to carry novel transgenes or gene edits, the population can be screened and enriched, and then transferred into a recipient embryo. The largest drawback of PGC culture is that culture methods do not transfer well across avian species, thus there are reliable culture methods for only a few species including the chicken. Two newer technologies that appear to be more easily adapted in a wider range of avian species are direct injection and sperm transfection assisted gene editing (STAGE). The direct injection method involves injecting genome engineering tools into the circulatory system of the developing embryo just prior to the developmental time point when the PGCs are migrating to the gonads. The genome engineering tools are complexed with transfection reagents, allowing for in vivo transfection of the PGCs. STAGE utilizes sperm transfection to deliver genome engineering tools directly to the newly fertilized embryo. Preliminary evidence indicates that both methodologies have the potential to be adapted for use in birds species other than the chicken, however further work is needed in this area.
在过去5年里,可用于基因组工程的工具已显著改进,使科学家能够对基因组进行精确编辑。随着这些新的基因组编辑工具的发展,用于递送它们的技术也取得了进步。在哺乳动物中,基因组工程工具通常被递送到体外受精的单细胞胚胎中,随后进行培养,然后植入受体动物体内。在鸟类中,这是不可能的,因此已经开发了其他用于鸟类基因组工程的方法。最常见的方法涉及原始生殖细胞(PGC)的体外培养,原始生殖细胞是通过胚胎循环系统迁移到发育中的性腺并在性腺中定植的细胞,最终分化为产生精子或卵子的性腺细胞。在培养过程中,PGC可以被修饰以携带新的转基因或基因编辑,可以对细胞群体进行筛选和富集,然后转移到受体胚胎中。PGC培养的最大缺点是培养方法在不同鸟类物种之间的转移性不佳,因此只有少数物种(包括鸡)有可靠的培养方法。另外两种似乎更容易在更广泛的鸟类物种中应用的新技术是直接注射和精子转染辅助基因编辑(STAGE)。直接注射方法是在PGC迁移到性腺的发育时间点之前,将基因组工程工具注射到发育中胚胎的循环系统中。基因组工程工具与转染试剂复合,从而实现PGC的体内转染。STAGE利用精子转染将基因组工程工具直接递送到新受精的胚胎中。初步证据表明,这两种方法都有潜力适用于鸡以外的鸟类物种,然而在这一领域还需要进一步的研究。