• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

意大利慢板:每部法律都有漏洞。

Italian Adagio: Every Law has Its Loophole.

机构信息

Dipartimento di Medicina Clinica e Sperimentale, Clinica Medica, University of Sassari, Viale San Pietro, n 8, 07100, Sassari, Italy.

Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.

出版信息

Sci Eng Ethics. 2019 Apr;25(2):651-653. doi: 10.1007/s11948-018-0031-7. Epub 2018 Feb 15.

DOI:10.1007/s11948-018-0031-7
PMID:29450682
Abstract

The Italian law of December 2010 establishes new criteria and parameters for the evaluation of faculty members. The parameters are represented by the number of articles published in journals listed in the main international data banks, the total number of citations and the h index. Candidates with qualifications at least in two out of three parameters may access the national competitions for associate or full professor and apply for an academic appointment. This system developed with the aim to fight nepotism and promote meritocracy, progressively led to the deterioration of the Italian university system. Since promotion in academia is strictly dependent on publications the faculty members found the solution to get over this system by organizing themselves into large consortia or small groups with the purpose of sharing authorship in scientific publications. In this way parameter thresholds may be easily reached and even surpassed. An Italian adagio says: "Fatta la Legge, Trovato l'Inganno"; "Every law has its Loophole". However, there is no science without ethics and researchers must stay away from any kind of compromise.

摘要

意大利 2010 年 12 月的法律为教师评估确立了新的标准和参数。这些参数由在主要国际数据库中列出的期刊上发表的文章数量、总引用次数和 h 指数来表示。至少在三个参数中的两个参数合格的候选人可以参加副教授或教授的国家竞赛,并申请学术任命。这个旨在打击任人唯亲、提倡任人唯贤的制度,逐渐导致意大利大学系统的恶化。由于在学术界的晋升严格依赖于出版物,教师们找到了通过将自己组织成大型联盟或小团体来克服这一制度的方法,目的是在科学出版物中共享作者身份。这样,参数门槛就可以很容易达到,甚至超过。意大利有句谚语:“Fatta la Legge, Trovato l'Inganno”;“Every law has its Loophole”。然而,没有伦理道德就没有科学,研究人员必须远离任何形式的妥协。

相似文献

1
Italian Adagio: Every Law has Its Loophole.意大利慢板:每部法律都有漏洞。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2019 Apr;25(2):651-653. doi: 10.1007/s11948-018-0031-7. Epub 2018 Feb 15.
2
National criteria for academic appointment in vascular surgery.国家血管外科学术任职资格标准。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 May;69(5):1559-1565. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.08.178.
3
Commentary on 'Honorary authorship epidemic in scholarly publications? How the current use of citation-based evaluative metrics make (pseudo)honorary authors from honest contributors of every multiauthor article.'.对《学术出版物中的荣誉作者泛滥?当前基于引用的评价指标如何将每篇多作者文章中的诚实贡献者变成(伪)荣誉作者》的评论
J Med Ethics. 2013 Aug;39(8):513. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100940. Epub 2012 Sep 19.
4
Writers Blocked: On the Wrongs of Research Co-authorship and Some Possible Strategies for Improvement.写作受阻:论研究共同署名的问题及一些可能的改进策略。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2015 Oct;21(5):1315-29. doi: 10.1007/s11948-014-9606-0. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
5
Honorary authorship epidemic in scholarly publications? How the current use of citation-based evaluative metrics make (pseudo)honorary authors from honest contributors of every multi-author article.学术出版物中的名誉作者泛滥?当前基于引文的评价指标的使用如何使每篇多作者文章中诚实的贡献者变成(伪)名誉作者。
J Med Ethics. 2013 Aug;39(8):509-12. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100568. Epub 2012 Aug 3.
6
Misused honorary authorship is no excuse for quantifying the unquantifiable.滥用荣誉作者并不构成对不可量化的事物进行量化的借口。
J Med Ethics. 2013 Aug;39(8):514. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100939. Epub 2012 Sep 6.
7
Academic criteria for promotion and tenure in biomedical sciences faculties: cross sectional analysis of international sample of universities.生物医学科学教师晋升和终身教职的学术标准:对国际大学样本的横断面分析。
BMJ. 2020 Jun 25;369:m2081. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m2081.
8
Journals Can Persuade Authors to Learn Publishing's Ethics.期刊可以说服作者了解出版伦理。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2019 Apr;25(2):631-633. doi: 10.1007/s11948-018-0021-9. Epub 2018 Feb 5.
9
The Pagerank-Index: Going beyond Citation Counts in Quantifying Scientific Impact of Researchers.PageRank指数:超越引用次数来量化研究人员的科学影响力
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 19;10(8):e0134794. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134794. eCollection 2015.
10
Academic Productivity in Psychiatry: Benchmarks for the H-Index.精神病学领域的学术生产力:H指数基准
Acad Psychiatry. 2017 Aug;41(4):452-454. doi: 10.1007/s40596-016-0656-2. Epub 2017 Apr 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Measuring nepotism through shared last names: the case of Italian Academia.通过姓氏相同来衡量裙带关系:意大利学术界的案例。
PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e21160. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021160. Epub 2011 Aug 3.