Horn Daniel, Kiss Hubert Janos
Institute of Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, Hungary.
Department of Economics, Faculty of Social Sciences, Eotvos Lorand University, Budapest, Hungary.
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 16;13(2):e0190163. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190163. eCollection 2018.
Success in life is determined to a large extent by school performance so it is important to understand the effect of the factors that influence it. In this exploratory study, in addition to cognitive abilities, we attempt to link measures of preferences with outcomes of school performance. We measured in an incentivized way risk, time, social and competitive preferences and cognitive abilities of university students to look for associations between these measures and two important academic outcome measures: exam results and GPA. We find consistently that cognitive abilities (proxied by the Cognitive Reflection Test) are very well correlated with school performance. Regarding non-cognitive skills, we report suggestive evidence for many of our measured preferences. We used two alternative measures of time preference: patience and present bias. Present bias explains exam grades better, while patience explains GPA relatively better. Both measures of time preferences have a non-linear relation to school performance. Competitiveness matters, as students, who opt for a more competitive payment scheme in our experimental task have a higher average GPA. We observe also that risk-averse students perform a little better than more risk-tolerant students. That makes sense in case of multiple choice exams, because more risk-tolerant students may want to try to pass the exam less prepared, as the possibility of passing an exam just by chance is not zero. Finally, we have also detected that cooperative preferences-the amount of money offered in a public good game-associates strongly with GPA in a non-linear way. Students who offered around half of their possible amounts had significantly higher GPAs than those, who offered none or all their money.
人生的成功在很大程度上取决于学业成绩,因此了解影响学业成绩的因素的作用很重要。在这项探索性研究中,除了认知能力外,我们还试图将偏好测量与学业成绩结果联系起来。我们以激励的方式测量了大学生的风险、时间、社会和竞争偏好以及认知能力,以寻找这些测量与两个重要的学业成绩指标之间的关联:考试成绩和平均绩点(GPA)。我们始终发现,认知能力(以认知反思测试为代理)与学业成绩密切相关。关于非认知技能,我们为许多测量的偏好提供了启发性证据。我们使用了两种时间偏好的替代测量方法:耐心和当前偏差。当前偏差对考试成绩的解释更好,而耐心对平均绩点的解释相对更好。两种时间偏好测量与学业成绩都呈非线性关系。竞争力很重要,因为在我们的实验任务中选择更具竞争性支付方案的学生平均绩点更高。我们还观察到,风险规避型学生的表现比更具风险承受力的学生略好。在多项选择题考试的情况下这是有道理的,因为更具风险承受力的学生可能想在准备不充分的情况下尝试通过考试,因为仅仅靠运气通过考试的可能性不为零。最后,我们还发现合作偏好——在公共物品博弈中提供的金钱数量——与平均绩点以非线性方式密切相关。提供大约一半可能金额的学生的平均绩点明显高于那些不提供或全部提供金钱的学生。