关于电子干预措施减少大学生酒精消费有效性的荟萃分析。
A meta-analysis of effectiveness of E-interventions to reduce alcohol consumption in college and university students.
作者信息
Prosser Tom, Gee Kate Ann, Jones Fergal
机构信息
a Canterbury Christ Church University, School of Psychology , Canterbury , UK.
b Canterbury Christ Church University, Salomons Centre for Applied Psychology , Tunbridge Wells , UK.
出版信息
J Am Coll Health. 2018 May-Jun;66(4):292-301. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2018.1440579. Epub 2018 Apr 19.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the effectiveness and moderators of E-Interventions versus assessment only (AO) controls in the reduction of alcoholic drinks per week (DPW) in university students.
STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS
Cochrane library, CINAEL, ERIC, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, PubMed, and Web of Science were searched up to June 2017. Studies were included if they were: an RCT, assessed the effectiveness of E-Interventions at reducing DPW, and employed university/college students. 23 studies (N = 7,614) were included and quality was assessed using the JADAD scale.
RESULTS
Weighted mean effect sizes were calculated using random-effects models. These showed a small, significant effect of E-Interventions at reducing the number of alcoholic DPW. Moderator analysis found a significant advantage for web-based personalised feedback interventions compared to other E-Interventions.
CONCLUSIONS
E-Interventions show a small, significant effect at reducing mean alcoholic DPW. Personalised feedback E-Interventions showed the strongest effect.
目的
评估电子干预措施与仅进行评估（AO）的对照措施相比，在减少大学生每周酒精饮料摄入量（DPW）方面的有效性及调节因素。
研究设计与方法
检索截至2017年6月的Cochrane图书馆、CINAHL、教育资源信息中心（ERIC）、医学期刊数据库（MEDLINE）、心理学文摘数据库（PsycINFO）、医学期刊全文数据库（PubMed）及科学引文索引数据库（Web of Science）。纳入标准为：随机对照试验（RCT）、评估电子干预措施在减少DPW方面的有效性、纳入大学/学院学生。共纳入23项研究（N = 7614），并使用JADAD量表评估质量。
结果
采用随机效应模型计算加权平均效应量。结果显示电子干预措施在减少酒精饮料每周摄入量方面有微小但显著的效果。调节因素分析发现，与其他电子干预措施相比，基于网络的个性化反馈干预措施具有显著优势。
结论
电子干预措施在减少平均酒精饮料每周摄入量方面有微小但显著的效果。个性化反馈电子干预措施效果最为显著。
Zotero 插件