• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

简要酒精筛查干预对大学生的效果(BASICS):随机对照试验的荟萃分析。

Efficacy of brief alcohol screening intervention for college students (BASICS): a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

机构信息

Department of Neurosciences and Behavior, University of Sao Paulo, Av, dos Bandeirantes, 3900-3° andar, Monte Alegre, Ribeirão Preto, SP 14048-900, Brazil.

出版信息

Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2012 Sep 12;7:40. doi: 10.1186/1747-597X-7-40.

DOI:10.1186/1747-597X-7-40
PMID:22967716
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3499225/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Many studies reported that brief interventions are effective in reducing excessive drinking. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of a protocol of brief intervention for college students (BASICS), delivered face-to-face, to reduce risky alcohol consumption and negative consequences.

METHODS

A systematic review with meta-analysis was performed by searching for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in Medline, PsycInfo, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases. A quality assessment of RCTs was made by using a validated scale. Combined mean effect sizes, using meta-analysis random-effects models, were calculated.

RESULTS

18 studies were included in the review. The sample sizes ranged from 54 to 1275 (median=212). All studies presented a good evaluation of methodological quality and four were found to have excellent quality. After approximately 12 months of follow-up, students receiving BASICS showed a significant reduction in alcohol consumption (difference between means=-1.50 drinks per week, 95% CI: -3.24 to -0.29) and alcohol-related problems (difference between means=-0.87, 95% CI: -1.58 to -0.20) compared to controls.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, BASICS lowered both alcohol consumption and negative consequences in college students. Gender and peer factors seem to play an important role as moderators of behavior change in college drinking. Characteristics of BASICS procedure have been evaluated as more favorable and acceptable by students in comparison with others interventions or control conditions. Considerations for future researches were discussed.

摘要

背景

许多研究表明,简短干预在减少过量饮酒方面是有效的。本研究旨在评估面对面进行的大学生简短干预方案(BASICS)在减少危险饮酒和不良后果方面的疗效。

方法

通过在 Medline、PsycInfo、Web of Science 和 Cochrane Library 数据库中搜索随机对照试验(RCT),进行系统评价和荟萃分析。使用经过验证的量表对 RCT 进行质量评估。使用荟萃分析随机效应模型计算综合平均效应大小。

结果

共纳入 18 项研究。样本量从 54 到 1275 不等(中位数=212)。所有研究的方法学质量评估均较好,其中 4 项研究质量优秀。在大约 12 个月的随访后,接受 BASICS 的学生与对照组相比,饮酒量显著减少(平均差异=-1.50 杯/周,95%CI:-3.24 至-0.29),与酒精相关的问题也减少(平均差异=-0.87,95%CI:-1.58 至-0.20)。

结论

总体而言,BASICS 降低了大学生的饮酒量和不良后果。性别和同伴因素似乎是大学生饮酒行为改变的重要调节因素。与其他干预措施或对照条件相比,BASICS 程序的特点被学生评估为更有利和可接受。讨论了未来研究的注意事项。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56e8/3499225/de73eb366127/1747-597X-7-40-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56e8/3499225/f62a081ef92a/1747-597X-7-40-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56e8/3499225/bc870c02573f/1747-597X-7-40-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56e8/3499225/de73eb366127/1747-597X-7-40-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56e8/3499225/f62a081ef92a/1747-597X-7-40-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56e8/3499225/bc870c02573f/1747-597X-7-40-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56e8/3499225/de73eb366127/1747-597X-7-40-3.jpg

相似文献

1
Efficacy of brief alcohol screening intervention for college students (BASICS): a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.简要酒精筛查干预对大学生的效果(BASICS):随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2012 Sep 12;7:40. doi: 10.1186/1747-597X-7-40.
2
Social norms information for alcohol misuse in university and college students.针对大学生酒精滥用问题的社会规范信息。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 26;1:CD006748. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006748.pub3.
3
Psychosocial interventions to reduce alcohol consumption in concurrent problem alcohol and illicit drug users.减少同时存在酒精问题和非法药物使用问题者饮酒量的心理社会干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Dec 3(12):CD009269. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009269.pub3.
4
Testing a brief motivational-interviewing educational commitment module for at-risk college drinkers: A randomized trial.测试一个简短的动机访谈教育承诺模块对有风险的大学生饮酒者的影响:一项随机试验。
Addict Behav. 2019 Mar;90:151-157. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.10.028. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
5
Substance use patterns among first-year college students: secondary effects of a combined alcohol intervention.大一学生的物质使用模式:酒精综合干预的次要影响。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2010 Dec;39(4):384-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2010.07.001.
6
Efficacy of alcohol interventions for first-year college students: a meta-analytic review of randomized controlled trials.针对大学一年级学生的酒精干预措施的效果:随机对照试验的荟萃分析综述
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2014 Apr;82(2):177-88. doi: 10.1037/a0035192. Epub 2014 Jan 20.
7
Brief alcohol intervention with college student drinkers: face-to-face versus computerized feedback.针对大学生饮酒者的简短酒精干预:面对面干预与计算机化反馈
Psychol Addict Behav. 2009 Mar;23(1):163-7. doi: 10.1037/a0014892.
8
A randomized controlled trial of event-specific prevention strategies for reducing problematic drinking associated with 21st birthday celebrations.一项针对特定事件的预防策略的随机对照试验,以减少与 21 岁生日庆祝活动相关的问题性饮酒。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2012 Oct;80(5):850-62. doi: 10.1037/a0029480. Epub 2012 Jul 23.
9
Motivational interviewing for alcohol misuse in young adults.针对青年成年人酒精滥用问题的动机性访谈
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Aug 21(8):CD007025. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007025.pub2.
10
The effectiveness of brief alcohol interventions in primary care settings: a systematic review.初级保健环境中简短酒精干预的效果:系统评价。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2009 May;28(3):301-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1465-3362.2009.00071.x.

引用本文的文献

1
A Novel Just-in-Time Intervention for Promoting Safer Drinking Among College Students: App Testing Across 2 Independent Pre-Post Trials.一种促进大学生安全饮酒的新型即时干预措施:在两项独立的前后对照试验中进行应用测试
JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 Apr 10;12:e69873. doi: 10.2196/69873.
2
The association between pain and negative alcohol-related consequences among college students engaged in binge drinking: The moderating role of reward and relief drinking motives.参与暴饮的大学生中疼痛与酒精相关负面后果之间的关联:奖励性和缓解性饮酒动机的调节作用。
Addict Behav. 2025 May;164:108287. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2025.108287. Epub 2025 Feb 8.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Individual-focused approaches to the prevention of college student drinking.以个体为中心的大学生饮酒预防方法。
Alcohol Res Health. 2011;34(2):210-21.
2
Randomized trial comparing computer-delivered and face-to-face personalized feedback interventions for high-risk drinking among college students.随机试验比较了针对大学生高危饮酒问题的计算机传递和面对面个性化反馈干预措施。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2012 Sep;43(2):260-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2011.11.001. Epub 2011 Dec 23.
3
Randomized trials of alcohol-use interventions with college students and their parents: lessons from the Transitions Project.
Addressing India's alcohol misuse crisis: The urgent need for screening and brief intervention to bridge the healthcare gap.
应对印度酒精滥用危机:通过筛查和简短干预弥合医疗差距的迫切需求。
Indian J Psychiatry. 2024 Oct;66(10):887-894. doi: 10.4103/indianjpsychiatry.indianjpsychiatry_785_24. Epub 2024 Oct 17.
4
Peer-led BASICS intervention to reduce alcohol consumption and alcohol-related consequences among university students: a randomized controlled trial.同伴主导的 BASICS 干预减少大学生饮酒和与饮酒相关后果:一项随机对照试验。
Front Public Health. 2023 Oct 31;11:1280840. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1280840. eCollection 2023.
5
A mobile-based pregaming drinking prevention intervention for college students: A pilot randomized controlled trial.基于移动设备的大学生赛前饮酒预防干预:一项试点随机对照试验。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2023 Nov;37(7):841-852. doi: 10.1037/adb0000925. Epub 2023 Apr 13.
6
Perceptions of Using Instant Messaging Apps for Alcohol Reduction Intervention Among University Student Drinkers: Semistructured Interview Study With Chinese University Students in Hong Kong.大学生饮酒者对使用即时通讯应用程序进行减少酒精摄入干预的看法:对香港中国大学生的半结构化访谈研究
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Feb 27;7:e40207. doi: 10.2196/40207.
7
Which interventions for alcohol use should be included in a universal healthcare benefit package? An umbrella review of targeted interventions to address harmful drinking and dependence.哪些干预酒精使用的措施应纳入全民医疗保健福利套餐?针对有害饮酒和依赖问题的目标干预措施的伞式综述。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Feb 23;23(1):382. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15152-6.
8
The socio-ecological context of U.S. college student drinking: A latent class analysis.美国大学生饮酒的社会生态背景:潜在类别分析。
Addict Behav. 2023 Jun;141:107666. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2023.107666. Epub 2023 Feb 15.
9
Implementing Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral Intervention for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention in Hospital Settings in Alberta: A Pilot Study.在艾伯塔省的医院环境中实施健康促进和疾病预防的筛查、简短干预和转介干预:一项试点研究。
Int J Public Health. 2023 Feb 2;68:1605038. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2023.1605038. eCollection 2023.
10
A mobile-based pregaming drinking prevention intervention for college students: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.基于移动设备的大学生赛前饮酒预防干预研究:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2022 Jun 18;17(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s13722-022-00314-5.
大学生及其父母的酒精使用干预措施的随机试验:来自“过渡项目”的经验教训。
Clin Trials. 2011 Apr;8(2):205-13. doi: 10.1177/1740774510396387. Epub 2011 Jan 26.
4
Computerized versus motivational interviewing alcohol interventions: impact on discrepancy, motivation, and drinking.计算机化与动机性访谈酒精干预:对差距、动机和饮酒的影响。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2010 Dec;24(4):628-39. doi: 10.1037/a0021347.
5
Screening and brief interventions for alcohol use in college health centers: a review.高校卫生中心的酒精使用筛查和简短干预:综述。
J Am Coll Health. 2010;59(3):151-8. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2010.502199.
6
The college and noncollege experience: a review of the factors that influence drinking behavior in young adulthood.大学和非大学经历:影响年轻人饮酒行为的因素综述。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2010 Sep;71(5):742-50. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2010.71.742.
7
Examination of posttraining supervision of peer counselors in a motivational enhancement intervention to reduce drinking in a sample of heavy-drinking college students.对同伴辅导员在动机增强干预中接受培训后的监督检查,以减少大量饮酒的大学生样本中的饮酒行为。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2010 Oct;39(3):289-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2010.06.005. Epub 2010 Jul 29.
8
Persistence of heavy drinking and ensuing consequences at heavy drinking colleges.高校中持续的豪饮行为及其后果。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2009 Sep;70(5):726-34. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2009.70.726.
9
Alcohol screening and brief intervention in a college student health center: a randomized controlled trial.大学生健康中心的酒精筛查与简短干预:一项随机对照试验。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs Suppl. 2009 Jul(16):131-41. doi: 10.15288/jsads.2009.s16.131.
10
A randomized clinical trial evaluating a combined alcohol intervention for high-risk college students.一项评估针对高危大学生的联合酒精干预措施的随机临床试验。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2009 Jul;70(4):555-67. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2009.70.555.